Are there people in the city who are willing to go to uninhabited villages in mountainous areas to o

The idea is beautiful, the reality is skinny, and it is difficult to make the trip. It's like a rural bachelor and a leftover woman in the city can't be combined! Even if the people in the city want to farm, who will give them the right to use the collective land? Who is going to protect their interests in planting on someone else's land?

The land in the village is idle, once someone goes to plant successfully and makes money, the locals will be red-eyed, so that people can't do it, this thing is difficult to coordinate, after all, urban people go to the countryside to farm, in principle, urban people do not belong to the village collective, and there are no rights that the local people should have. There are so many examples of this that it's really hard to get started.

A friend of mine heard that there is a mountain township nearby, with a lot of wasteland and cheap land, so he had the impulse to start a business and contracted more than 100 acres of mountainous land to grow medicinal materials. At the beginning of the contract, the people in the village wanted their friends to sign a long-term contract, but the friends had no idea about planting medicinal herbs, so they signed a three-year contract and saw what they did. As a result, after three years of planting, some water conservancy facilities were repaired, and the locals saw that it was profitable to grow medicinal herbs.

Sign the contract again for a long rent that is doubled, and I can't wait to "die" someone! This pink eye.

It's very powerful, and my friends can't do it, so it's more comfortable to go to other places to contract land planting, than to continue planting here.

In the case of my friend's contract for abandoned land in other towns, it can be seen that once an outsider makes a result, the locals will immediately react differently, feeling that others are cheap, and the locals should be allowed to get rid of it. If surplus urban labor is allowed to go to the countryside to cultivate idle land, who will ensure that their rights and interests are not affected by the locals? This is not possible unless there are provisions to protect such operations.

Otherwise, the grain you cultivate on the land of other people's "homes" will be reaped by the "landlord" at that time, and in addition to investment, if you have money to earn, wouldn't you make a wedding dress for others?

Furthermore, if urban people are given the right to plant on rural land, then who will guarantee the interests of the rural people? This is a dilemma. If there is a legal provision that says, in "Borderlands"After five years of farming, no one is in charge, and the land itself has the right to use it continuously.

Then, it is still relatively deterrent to crack down on the malicious abandonment of land in rural areas. Otherwise, there would be no urban idlers to go to the "owner's wasteland" to engage in planting.

Yes. Because it is a good choice to go to uninhabited villages in mountainous areas to cultivate wasteland, and the state now attaches more importance to the development of rural areas, there are still a small number of urban people who are willing to go.

I don't want to, because the surrounding area is no man's land, and it's all wasteland, which is not looked down on by people nowadays, and I don't want to do those thankless jobs.

I don't think so. Because people nowadays live a glamorous life. No one wants to go to the wilderness to do hard and tiring work.

Summary. Dear, I'm honored to have your question The information that the teacher found for you here is: Can barren mountains be cultivated casually:

Barren mountains can't be cultivated casually, no. The so-called barren mountains also have owners. Reclamation means destroying the original vegetation, and first, it is necessary to clarify the ownership of the wasteland before reclamation

If it is a state-owned barren mountain, wasteland, or barren beach, it can be cleared and used for agriculture, but not for building houses; If it is wasteland belonging to the village collective, it can only be reclaimed and used after consultation with the village collective. For the "four wastelands" (referring to barren mountains, barren ditches, barren hills, and barren beaches), the state encourages the reclamation of wasteland, and if there is no one in the village collective to develop it, it can also be contracted to people outside the collective. 2. Legal basis:

Article 40 of the Land Management Law stipulates that the reclamation of unused land must be scientifically demonstrated and evaluated, and shall be carried out after approval in accordance with the law in the areas that can be reclaimed as demarcated in the overall land use plan. It is forbidden to destroy forests and grasslands to reclaim cultivated land, to enclose lakes to create farmland, and to encroach on river floodplains. Article 41 Where the development of state-owned barren mountains, wastelands, or barren beaches for which the right of use has not been determined, for planting, forestry, animal husbandry, or fishery production, it may be determined that the development units or individuals may use them for a long time with the approval of the people at or above the county level in accordance with law.

Dear, I'm honored to have your question The information that the teacher found for you here is: Can barren mountains be cultivated casually: Barren mountains can't be cultivated casually, no.

The so-called barren mountains also have owners. Reclamation means destroying the original vegetation, first, the wilderness needs to be clarified before the rock sparrow is cleared: if it is a state-owned barren mountain, wasteland, or barren beach, it can be cleared and used for agriculture, but not for building houses; If it is wasteland belonging to the village collective, it can only be reclaimed and used after consultation with the village collective.

For the "four wastelands" (referring to barren mountains, barren ditches, barren hills, and barren beaches), the state encourages the reclamation of wasteland, and if there is no one in the village collective to develop it, it can also be contracted to people outside the collective. 2. Legal basis: Article 40 of the "Land Management Law" The reclamation of unused land must be scientifically demonstrated and evaluated, and shall be carried out after approval in accordance with the law in the areas that can be reclaimed as demarcated in the overall land use plan.

It is forbidden to destroy forests and grasslands to reclaim cultivated land, to enclose lakes to create farmland, and to encroach on river floodplains. Article 41 Where the development of state-owned barren hills, wastelands, or barren beaches for which the right of use has not been determined, and for planting, forestry, animal husbandry, or fishery residue production, may be determined for long-term use by development units or individuals upon approval by the people at or above the county level in accordance with law.

Suggestion: Dear [Xian Hall File Flower] Now that the epidemic is repeated, you must pay attention to the <> of the slag when you go out and pretend to be chaotic

Wear a mask when you go out, wash your hands frequently! Have a great day, <>

Summary. Hello, first go to the village and ask if it is an ecological protection forest. As for the barren hills and slopes that are collectively idle, as long as they are not ecological protection forests, in principle, they can be cultivated for farming, and the state also has such regulations, that is, the principle of "whoever clears the land benefits from it".

Hello, first go to the village and ask if it is an ecological protection forest. As for the barren hills and slopes that are collectively idle, as long as they are not ecological protection forests, in principle, they can be cultivated for farming, and the state also has such regulations, that is, the principle of "whoever clears the land benefits from it".

According to the provisions of the state, farmers who open up wasteland for cultivation can enjoy the income from the cultivation of the land in accordance with the law. This point is also not disputed in the countryside, the land you reclaim is naturally cultivated by you, and the income from cultivation is naturally your own. This is commonly referred to as "whoever opens up the land benefits".

As for the usage rights, it's not endless. The usual practice in rural areas is to do so during a round of land contracts. When it comes to the new round of land contracting, since the barren mountains you have reclaimed have long been turned into cultivated land, the village collective should issue the contract, and you no longer have the right to benefit from the land.

Farmers do not have the ownership of the land, and the ownership belongs to the village collective.

Therefore, peasants should be cautious in clearing wasteland. First, don't destroy forests to clear the land, that would violate the law; the second is to try to open up the wasteland at the beginning of the contract period to obtain more income years; The second is to foresee in advance and open up wasteland for farming in places that are not likely to be expropriated in the near future, so as not to cause unnecessary trouble and pay for labor in vain.

Summary. Hello dear, I'm glad to answer for you, can barren mountains be cultivated at will The answer is: barren mountains can't be cultivated casually, it needs to go through the approval process of reclamation of wasteland, and the state-owned barren mountains and wastelands that have not determined the right to use the land, less than 600 hectares, in accordance with the authority stipulated by the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government, shall be approved by the local people at or above the county level; If the development is more than 600 hectares, it shall be reported for approval".

It is not allowed to mine wasteland to plant vegetation at will, which is illegal.

Hello dear, I'm glad to answer for you, can barren mountains be cultivated casually The answer is: barren mountains can't be cultivated casually in Hengqing, and they need to go through the approval process of reclamation of wasteland, and the state-owned barren mountains and wastelands that have not determined the right to use the land are less than 600 hectares, and the authority stipulated by the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government shall be approved by the local people at or above the county level; If the development is more than 600 hectares, it shall be reported for approval". It is not allowed to mine wasteland to plant vegetation at will, which is illegal.

Extension trembling limb grip is related: barren mountain, refers to a mountain that has not been cultivated or developed, or refers to a remote and inaccessible mountain. famine, overgrown or arid and barren because no one has managed it; Mountain, generally refers to the high altitude with a large degree of hunger and a steep slope.

Deserted, due to no one to govern and the grass and trees are overgrown or arid and barren; Mountain, generally refers to the height of the highland, steep slope of the highland.

Summary. No, barren mountains belong to the category of the four wastelands in rural areas, and it is to support individuals to contract in other ways than household contracting. According to Article 40 of the Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China, the development of state-owned barren mountains, wastelands, and barren beaches that have not determined the right of use for planting, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery production may be determined for long-term use by development units or individuals with the approval of the people at or above the county level in accordance with the law.

No, barren mountains belong to the category of four wastelands or acres in rural areas, and it is to support individuals to contract in other ways other than household contracting. According to Article 40 of the Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China, the development of state-owned barren mountains, wastelands, and barren beaches that have not determined the right to use them for planting, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery production may be determined to be used by development units or individuals for long-term use upon approval by the people at the county level and above in accordance with the law.

Hello, I have a forest right certificate, someone is cultivating land on the side of my Xinji Mountain, but I don't know whether it is the land that was returned to Tan before the forest right certificate or the land that was reclaimed and planted after the forest right certificate, should I return the missing car?

And then there's this guy on the edge of the reclaimed land, and I bury a dead man on the side of my mountain, can I win a lawsuit with him? Thank you.

Check it out for you.

There is a forest hidden cave warrant, but it is also covered by the right to use the forest land and the ownership and use rights of the related forest or forest trees. In our country, no individual has the ownership of land (including forest land), and there are only two subjects of ownership: the state or the collective!

Individual citizens can only have the right to use forest land, the ownership of forest trees, and the right to use forest trees, and do not have the right to dry up forest land.

You can sue, but it is not recommended, the best way is to find the owner of the grave and negotiate, the land opened is within the scope of my forest right certificate Can others reclaim it and use it at will?

If it is an ownerless grave, the village committee will also make an announcement and go through the relevant legal procedures for moving the grave. It can be handled in accordance with the "village rules and conventions".

If the owner of the grave is unscrupulous, he will not return it, and he will say that he is buried in the open ground.

No, he is an infringement. You have the right to sue him.

Hello, what is the current land use in your forest tenure certificate?