If inflation, will the rich lose the most or the poor lose the most? What is the reason?

Generally speaking, if there is inflation, the losses of the rich must not be as severe as the losses of the poor.

The so-called inflation refers to the economic phenomenon of currency depreciation and price level caused by the amount of money in circulation exceeding the actual needs of the economy under the credit monetary system.

To put it simply, inflation means that money is worthless, prices are serious, and there are fewer and fewer things that can be bought with the same money.

Although the currency will depreciate after inflation, it is very likely to increase in value. Once there is inflation, the gap between the rich and the poor will become more pronounced, and the rich will only get richer and the poor will get poorer.

Wealthy people have a lot of money in their hands, and they usually don't just keep it in the bank, but try to invest in various items after learning about financial literacy. Some rich people will invest their money in real estate, so that the house will be called their fixed assets, and the current ** house price is continuous**, as long as the house is sold, it can resist a certain amount of inflation. Some rich people will use the money to sell **, ** and other items, the value of this kind of goods is generally good and bad, as long as you sell it when it is good, you can get a lot of profits, and it is also able to have a certain amount of inflation.

Some rich people like to take risks, will use the money to invest **, **, creditor's rights, etc., although there is a certain risk, but once the profit is also very objective, as the saying goes, take a bike into a motorcycle.

Rich people are not worried about losing money because they have capital in their hands, so they will try various investments to make money and make money, which is fully lower than the losses caused by inflation in the market, so they are generally not affected by inflation.

Compared with the rich people's spending, the poor seem to be a bit stretched.

Poor people are generally able to work diligently with their hands, receive a fixed monthly salary, and have no other income**, so every penny spent will be carefully considered. Because of the fear of losing all their money, the poor generally rarely invest, and even if they do have surplus money, they will only choose to deposit the excess money in the bank for interest. However, with the development of society, the interest earned by bank deposits is becoming less and less, and it is completely unable to resist inflation in the market.

So in general, inflation affects the interests of the poor more. But not all people are born rich, and they all make themselves richer through their own hard work, so the way of thinking is very important. Learn more about money and know how to reasonably allocate the assets in your hands, so that you can resist and outperform market inflation to the greatest extent.

In the case of inflation, the losses of the rich are more severe. Because the lives of the rich are relatively rich, some of the materials they usually buy are in short supply, which will reduce their living standards, and the poor generally have a lower standard of living and buy cheaper things, so inflation does not have much impact on the poor, and the losses are not particularly serious.

It is because after inflation, the money in the hands of the rich will depreciate in the currency, the money will be worthless, the original money will not be able to buy the same goods at all, and the lives of the poor have not changed very much.

It's the rich who lose a lot, because the rich have a very high level of economy, and they spend a lot of money, and they don't care about the food, so I think it's the rich who lose a lot.

Introduction: When economic development is unstable, inflation will only make the gap between the rich and the poor in society worse, so it will lead to more serious losses for the poor. People know that the reason why the rich are called rich is because they have a lot of money, so when people have money, it is not only in the sense of banknotes, but also in the overall assets, such as rich people like to buy a house or buy **, etc., in this case, it will not affect the life of the rich.

1. If there is inflation, what is the basis for whether the rich suffer serious losses or the poor suffer serious losses?

Under normal circumstances, in the event of inflation, the losses of the rich must be less than that of the poor. Because the rich have a lot of money and invest in other assets, there are many rich people who like to have fixed assets, so they buy a house, and at the same time believe in it, so they start hoarding, investing, etc. For the wealthy, if there is inflation, due to the diversity of assets, there will be an increase in value, and when inflation is serious, real estate and ** may increase.

2. Why the poor suffer more serious losses

In this society, lovers are originally in a vulnerable group, they are just to make ends meet, so they are constantly working and have less income, in this case, it is impossible to invest the money earned in other assets, and there is no time and energy to accumulate original capital, only through labor can be earned, and this situation also limits the vision of the poor and the information to make money, so it leads to falling into a cycle. Once the situation of inflation occurs, it leads to very serious losses for the poor. <>

3. Summary

In real life, the assets owned by the rich and the poor are not equal, so in this case, the poor have no ability to resist risks, so it can only lead to more serious losses for the poor, if the economy continues to grow, then the wealth of the rich will grow much faster than the poor, if it is inflation, then the degree of loss is much lower than that of the poor.

If inflation, I don't think the rich lose as much as the poor lose, and there are these reasons:1The rich have achieved financial freedom, so even if inflation is severe, it will not affect their quality of life, and for the poor, inflation is to use more money to buy daily necessities. 2.

Inflation has little impact on the rich, because the rich have money for investment, so even if they lose money, it is still investment money, and it does not affect their quality of life, while the poor are different, the money is concentrated on daily life consumption, so the loss will be more serious.

If inflation,The wealth of the rich is much less than that of the poor. Because it is not calculated in absolute terms, but in terms of the rate of growth or decline. Therefore, if there is economic instability, then it will lead to a greater gap between the rich and the poor in society.

This is closely related to the unequal balance of assets and liabilities owned by the rich and the poor. In this case, there is a complete disparity in the ability to resist risks, which ultimately leads to greater losses for the poor.

If there is a contraction, I think that the loss of the poor is not as great as the loss of the poor, and there is such a basis. The poor have already achieved financial freedom, so even if the shortening of the currency is significant, it will not affect the quality of life, and for the poor, the shortening of the currency will take more life.

I think it may be that the poor lose more heavily, because by inflation, the poor can't buy anything at all, and all of that stuff is taken by the rich.

Personally, I think that the rich will lose more heavily, because the more assets they have, the more volatile they will be affected by the risk of inflation.

Some experts say that inflation is good for the poor, because inflation makes money worthless, so the rich shrink their money, and the poor themselves don't have much money, so inflation is good for them, so is this the reality?

Inflation is bad for both. The poor can't afford it, the rich are afraid of depreciation, the ** period is longer, and the instability increases. Deflation is bad for the poor, but neither is the rich to sit back and relax. Neither has an impact on those in power. It's just a political ploy on their part.

There is no such argument that excessively high inflation is painful for anyone.

Of course, inflation is good for debtors and bad for creditors.

There is no such thing as this, it depends on the composition of the assets, and inflation simply means that the value of cash is not as good as before, and the money is hairy.

If a rich person's assets are all expressed in cash, then inflation will increase, and he must have lost a lot.

But if most of his assets are made up of hard currency, there is nothing to lose. It is good for the debtor and bad for the creditor is true. There is also an increase in inflation, which is good for the people, and bad for the people.

It is said that depending on the composition of asset inflation, there is no cash value at all before the money is issued.

Represented by the abundant asset composition is cash, so inflation increases his losses.

But if it is by his assets as hard currency, there will be nothing to lose. It is advantageous to speak to creditors for the debtor and to the disadvantage. There is an increase in inflation in favor of **, the people.

If inflation, will the people who suffer the most be rich or poor? This question is actually very simple, I personally think that if the worst loss of inflation must be the poor, even if the rich are in inflation, at most his assets have shrunk, but he still has a lot of assets, and there is definitely no problem with worrying about food and clothing. But what about the poor?

If inflation reaches a certain level, if he has a car loan and a house loan, he may not be able to pay the loan, and the house will be auctioned. You may even lose your job.

Historically, every time inflation has been victimized, it is ordinary people who have suffered. Inflation means that prices**, the purchasing power of money decreases. Then for the poor, it will inevitably have a great impact on their clothing, food, housing and transportation, and the quality of life will definitely decline.

And for the rich, every inflation does not make them bankrupt, but because they have a lot of funds in their hands, they allocate assets in the case of price inflation, buy houses, buy them, but let them **, that is, buy at a low level. Once the economy improves, prices**, inflation will ease. At this time he put his property in inflation, bought at a low price and ****.

Then he can make a lot of money again.

For the rich, they can resist the effects of inflation, while for the poor, they are far less resilient than the rich. The poor basically have no savings, most of them have mortgages, many people rely on work to support their families, it can be said that the pressure is very high, once there is an economic crisis, inflation, resulting in unemployment, then their end may be bankruptcy. If you can't pay the mortgage, the house will be repossessed.

This is very influential. That's why the state is trying to control prices and prevent inflation. This is because if such a situation occurs, it will bring a great crisis to the country.

It's the poor, they still have a lot of debts, they can't afford to eat or drink, they are kicked out, they live in the streets.

It doesn't matter if the rich lose the most, and the money they have will depreciate a lot, while the poor don't have much money themselves.

It could be the poor, they can't eat or drink, a lot of people don't have jobs, they don't have money everywhere, and they're ready to starve to death on the streets.