On the battlefield, if the commander defects to the enemy, can the soldier resist the military order

If the commander defects to the enemy, then the soldiers can disobey the military order and kill the commander who surrendered to the enemy on the spot.

If the commander defects to the enemy, the soldier can resist the military order, and if the soldier does not resist the military order, then he will also surrender to the enemy. When the commander defects to the enemy, the commander is no longer a commander, but a traitor.

No, you cannot. Ancient soldiers had a low level of education and only knew their own generals and non-commissioned officers. Orders from superiors must be obeyed unconditionally.

Of course, a soldier can disobey a military order, because the commander on the battlefield defects to the enemy, which is a violation of military discipline, and according to the regulations, a soldier can refuse to carry out the military order to surrender.

On November 27, 1950, Truman, the United States and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, personally approved the court-martialed verdict against Lieutenant Gilbert, and the first person to sign the conviction document of a lieutenant company commander against Hu was unique in the history of the US military. Gilbert's crime was that he and his 12 company soldiers refused to carry out the battlefield orders of the field gendarmerie, and in the words of Li Yunlong, the commander of the Eighth Route Army, he was "battlefield disobedience."

The 25th Division of the U.S. Army was the first unit to be sent to the Korean battlefield, and the 24th Regiment under the division is also a relatively old team: the 24th Infantry Regiment was formed by a 1887 act of the United States Congress and was also very "brave" in the war against the Indians. However, the regiment was also a unit that had long been discriminated against and ridiculed because the entire regiment was composed of Puerto Rican soldiers, the legendary "black regiment".

In July 1950, the 24th Regiment was ordered to hold the city of Na Liquan, but the soldiers found that the city was on fire and immediately retreated after firing a burst of gunfire, and reported to the higher authorities that "the enemy encountered superiority in strength", and it was later verified that the fire in the city was caused by the American army's own artillery fire, and there was no enemy. And later in the battle west of Sangju, the performance of the 24th Regiment became a disgrace for the 25th Division.

The division's combat history recorded: "The 24th Infantry Regiment was in a state of panic, the soldiers deserted their positions and slipped to the rear, and abandoned their positions without permission, and when the third battalion withdrew from a certain high ground, a total of 15 machine guns, 11 mortars, four rocket launchers and 101 rifles were discarded." Division Commander William.

Jean was furious about this, and the other troops nicknamed the 24th Regiment "Escape".

The disaster was still to come, in the Battle of Qingchuan River, under the sudden attack of the 115th Division of the 39th Army of the Volunteer Army, the first battalion of the 24th Regiment of the US Army abandoned its position without authorization and fled, leaving all the artillery behind. In order to prevent soldiers from escaping, the U.S. military police set up checkpoints on the highways, and Gendarmerie Major Woolrich was authorized to detain all soldiers who retreated without permission, with the result that he intercepted an average of 75 deserters per day.

On the largest day, the gendarmes arrested 150 deserters, including Lieutenant Gilbert, the commander of the 24th Regiment, and 12 of his soldiers. <>

The military police major ordered them to return to their positions to fight immediately, and 13 men refused to carry out the order at the same time, believing that the front line had been completely defeated and there was no need to return to battle. The court sentenced the soldiers to prison on the spot, and the company commander, Lieutenant Gilbert, sentenced them to death, and the 13 officers and men appealed, and then the Army judge commuted Lieutenant Gilbert's sentence to 20 years in prison.

You can't refuse to carry out orders, because the soldier's duty is to obey the order, so even if the commander's wisdom is wrong, the soldier still needs to obey unconditionally.

It is not permissible to refuse to carry it out, because it is the duty of a soldier to obey orders and he cannot disobey his superiors.

No, the warrior should have absolute obedience to orders as the primary purpose, because the warrior's cognitive abilities are not necessarily as correct as those of the commander.

No. Because the duty of a soldier is to obey orders. For an excellent army, Yu Duan must be seriously organized and disciplined, and obedience to orders is the first of them.

Yes, if the commander defects, it can be omitted.

If you refuse to obey, you may be executed by your commander, because on the battlefield, you must obey your commander's orders, and if you disobey orders, you will definitely be executed by your superiors.

It will be the end of being killed, because the commander who defects to the enemy will not let his defection pose any risk.

He may be brutally murdered or placed under house arrest for a long time, and will never be released without obedience.

No, because the soldier needs to obey the commander's arrangement, so the commander defects to the enemy, and the soldier generally does not refuse to obey.

Of course, you can, but ordinary soldiers don't dare to do this, because once the commander surrenders to the enemy, then the soldiers under him will basically obey, and if there is disobedience, then they will be disposed of.

Soldiers can refuse to obey, but they will generally comply, after all, soldiers always have"Obedience is a duty"The tradition, the idea of obeying the orders of the commander is firmly engraved in their minds.

On the battlefield, when the commander surrenders to the enemy, his soldiers can refuse to obey, but in fact, most of the soldiers follow the commander and rarely disobey the commander.

I think it's okay in general, but there's a good chance you'll be captured by the enemy.

You can refuse, the commander defects to the enemy, this is unforgivable, on the battlefield, the prisoners can survive, treat them well, singular traitors must be killed, this is the rule of the army, don't say that it is to surrender to the enemy As long as you cooperate with the enemy, you will be rejected by your subordinates, and even treated by force, although in the army are like a mountain of military orders, but in this case, these can be changed. <>

1. Refusal will be killed, but in the troubled times of ancient times, many people mean that it is a good errand in the army, and to have an army is to have many others, at this time, in order to get more benefits, many generals at this time will cooperate with others, in order to get more help, the commander at this time will give benefits to the subordinates, and can even directly control the army beyond their superiors, coinciding with the troubled times, taking advantage of the chaos to get more money, at this time many underground people will not refuse, Even if a small number of people refuse, there will be others who will kill these rebels. <>

For example, in the Red Army's Long March, an army was led by many generals, and there would be operational disagreements between the two, and who would be listened to at this time, this is also a problem, with the passage of time, many evidence can not be verified, but we will still know, for example, in World War II, Germany entered Paris, and began to rage madly, At this time, the generals of the army in Paris began their own surrender, but one of them disagreed, believing that the attack on Paris was their own mistake and should not surrender, even if it was breached, they should return to their hometown, directly apologize for their crimes with death, and demand that all the one-time suicides be committed at one time, and they cannot live secretly. But at this time, the two will be different, but the soldiers underground will have different opinions. What about the people below?

Orders are dead and change each time depending on the event.

Yes, but if the soldier refuses, he will basically die, so basically the commander on the battlefield will join the enemy.

Soldiers under his command must not refuse to obey unless they do not want to live.

Because the mission of a soldier is to be responsible for obeying the command of his superiors, relatively speaking, if the superiors surrender, the soldiers must obey the commands of their superiors.

Of course, on the battlefield, the commander instigated to surrender to the enemy, but there are also backbone soldiers who will refuse to surrender and fight to the death.

It is not possible to refuse. Because if they refuse, they will be killed.