-
Couldn't agree more. From the perspective of competition, if everyone wants to be a general, then the overall level will inevitably be improved, and there will be no disadvantages.
I think the upstairs is off topic, this topic is not about the contradiction between personal development and social needs, but the role of personal mentality on self-understanding and improvement, do you think that people should pursue excellence? Or do you think that people only need to do the most basic things?
I think doing my job well is the first step, but if there is no higher requirements, the ancients said: if you don't advance, you will retreat, and the result of not seeking progress will inevitably lead to the improvement of the overall level, and you will fall outside the standard. So that he will not be a "good soldier".
I think that a person who does not even have a lofty ideal, let him do his own job, this requirement may not be realistic, how can a person who does not even have a direction of struggle do his job well! What is it about doing a good job in the incumbent?
An army in which the general is well commanded and the soldiers obey the transfer will win the battle; If a soldier is not satisfied with being a soldier, and everyone wants to be a general and make decisions, and A says that he needs to fight north, and B says that he should attack north, what will be the result of such an army?
People have their own place in society, we should correctly understand our own position, fully recognize the importance of our position, be down-to-earth, and do our work well.
Be self-motivated, don't be unrealistic, be ambitious, float in mid-air, and can't find the ground, so you have to fall on your heels.
Not wanting to be a general is not a good soldier, and it is terrible for everyone to want to be a general. To be a soldier is to be a good soldier, to be a good farmer is to be a good peasant, and to do one's own work well is the best expression of one's own ability. Believe in the saying: gold always shines!
Don't forget, Monsieur Napoleon also progressed from corporal to general!
From the perspective of competition, if everyone wants to be a general, then the overall level will inevitably be improved, and there will be no disadvantages.
I think doing my job well is the first step, but if there is no higher requirements, the ancients said: if you don't advance, you will retreat, and the result of not seeking progress will inevitably lead to the improvement of the overall level, and you will fall outside the standard. So that he will not be a "good soldier".
Only a confident person would want to be a good general.
-
A soldier who wants to be a general is not necessarily a good soldier! First of all, in his idea of becoming a general, he must clarify several goals, why he wants to be a general, and if he is a general, how to manage his army well! And think about how to be a good general!
If all soldiers can think like this, then a soldier who wants to be a general is a good soldier! If the soldiers think about themselves every day, if they become generals, they can manage others every day, they don't need to train, they don't have to get up on time, they don't have to listen to other people's commands! Just want the scenery and enjoy.
Then such a soldier is not a good general even if he becomes a general, let alone a good soldier! So a soldier who wants to be a general is not necessarily a good soldier!
-
yes. What soldier doesn't want to be a general, it's one thing to be indeserved, but he definitely wants to be.
It's like when I was in school, I wanted to get three good students, no matter whether I took it or not, at least I wanted to get it.
-
A soldier who does not want to be a general is not a good soldier. If a person voluntarily does a good job of the work at hand, to:"It's none of your business, hang high"The attitude of the company he serves, he will never be able to create benefits for the enterprise. People who can lead and motivate others will have good working relationships with their colleagues and will work to help deploy them to their potential.
-
This sentence is certainly true, because a soldier who has been a soldier for a lifetime can only show that he is very incompetent and cannot complete various tasks. There is no enterprising spirit.
-
Soldiers are encouraged to have ambitions and ideals, but at the same time, they must also base themselves on doing their own work well, and cannot be empty of ambitions and do things in a down-to-earth manner.
This quote comes from the French Emperor Napoleon. Bonaparte. Napoleon Bonaparte, ruler of the First French Republic and Emperor of the First French Empire, was born in Corsica, France, and was a military genius par excellence.
He repeatedly defeated the Royalist counterattacks and the invasion of the anti-French alliance, and defended the gains of the French Revolution. The Civil Code promulgated by him became the legislative blueprint for later capitalist countries. During his reign, he expanded many times, forming a huge imperial system and creating a series of military miracles.
-
"A soldier who does not want to be a general is not a good soldier" did not have a next sentence.
This sentence is a famous sentence said by General Napoleon, which was sought after by later generations and became a wise saying used by many leaders to motivate their subordinates during meetings.
People have their own position in society, and they should correctly understand their own position, fully recognize the importance of their position, be down-to-earth, and do their work well.
1 Do soldiers do the same job as generals? Yes -> then what do you want a general for? >>>More
This is from Napoleon, saying that a soldier who does not want to be a general is not a good soldier. Personally, I think that a marshal is obviously different from a soldier, and it does not mean that a good soldier can be a good officer. The marshal commanded the troops, and the soldiers charged. >>>More
In fact, he usually loves his subordinates well, but if he makes a mistake, he will be dealt with by military law, but it is not as cruel as in the book. The book also has a purpose in writing that.
In ancient times, soldiers who did not obey orders usually had two different ends, one was good, for example, the soldier did something that made them win the war, and the soldier was promoted and rich, and the other was that the soldier was punished for not obeying the command or became the fastest person to die on the battlefield. Let's talk about the consequences of these two types of disobedience. >>>More
The corpses that died in the war were generally disposed of by the victorious side, some would be eaten by some primitive tribesmen, and some would be made into various frightening specimens to frighten the enemy, and the most common way to deal with them was to dig a large pit in the field and bury the corpses.