Did the landlords of the old society have more land or more money?

There were many landlords in the old society. Because land was a money-making tool for landlords in the old society, and when they had money, they would use it to buy land.

Of course, there is a lot of land, and the reason why he is called a landlord is because he has a lot of land. These lands will also bring him income, and he will naturally have more money.

For ordinary people, landlords not only have more land, but also more money. In feudal society, land is the dependence of survival, with land there will be money, and with money there will be more exploitation, and the fate of the landlords and the poor will be repeated and unchanged.

There is a lot of land. In ancient times, people believed that land was the foundation, and when they had money, they would continue to buy houses and land to pass on to future generations.

In the old society, the landlords and old wealth were not all hateful, there were good and evil, and some of them started from scratch from the peasants, so they knew the suffering of the peasants very well, and they were very kind. There is also a part of the land that was obtained by forcible seizure, so they only know how to oppress others.

In many film and television dramas, we will see the landlords and old wealth of the old society, and they are all very hateful images. In fact, there are good and evil landlords and old wealth in society, and not all of them are very hateful, so I will talk to you about it today.

I think that the landlord and the old wealth are just a class, and the people of this class are the same as ordinary people, they are like two sides of a coin, there are good and bad. The landlord class in the old society was not all a single image, some landlords were very good, and of course there were some very hateful landlords. We can't generalize.

In the old society, there were some good landlords, and the reason why they were able to become landlords was also because of the diligence and thrift of their ancestors. Because they were not landlords at first, but gradually became rich, they also understood the peasants and did not embarrass them. From a historical point of view, many landlords were not as evil as they are portrayed in literature, but treated peasants and workers well.

Think about it from another angle, because these people are working for the landlord, and the landlord is also the boss in a sense, and the boss is not good to the employees, and these people will not work with all their strength, and the boss himself will suffer in the end. In addition, these people are just ordinary small rich peasants, and they don't have much power, so they live on this one-third of an acre, and their basic income is very much due to the farmers' contributions. It can be seen from this that there is really no need for some landlords to oppress the peasants.

As for those landlords who do a lot of evil, many of them are forcibly plundering, oppressing the people, and doing all kinds of evil. The reason why such people can become landlords is not because of the hard work of generation after generation, but because of the land obtained by forcible grabbing. Such people do not understand what the suffering of the people is, and they cannot sympathize with the peasants.

Because they have not experienced it, they can be said to be the wicked people in the concept of contemporary society. Such hateful landlords would squeeze ordinary peasants and put all their money in their own pockets.

The above is the reason why the landlords and old money in the old society are not really hateful, and there are some evidences.

The landlords and old wealth of the old society had good and hateful.

However, one thing is absolutely certain, whether it is a bully landlord with a landless peasant mentality or a landlord who is sympathetic to the landless peasants, they all exploit the landless peasants in different forms and attitudes by occupying the land resources for their livelihood and survival. Moreover, it is impossible for them to willingly give up their vested social interests and distribute their land to landless peasants to cultivate.

The old society must be very hateful, the first point is that they deduct the wages of the workers, the second point is that the workers work for him day and night, and the third point is that they own a lot of land, but the rent collection is particularly ruthless.

In our concept, it seems that the landlords are bullies like Huang Shiren, Zhou Papi, and Hu Hansan, who eat and drink spicy food, often exploit the toiling masses, and bully men and women to do bad things. Although they rented the land to the peasants for sowing, they collected a lot of rent and made the common people work hard in the fields, and as a result, all the grain was paid all the rent throughout the year, and sometimes it was not even enough to pay the rent, and it was because of this that the common people hated the landlords very much.

China has long belonged to an agrarian civilization.

For agrarian civilization, the most important factor of production.

It was the land, in feudal society.

A large amount of land was held in the hands of the squires, landlords and other magnates, who rented the land to ordinary people, who earned just enough food for a year, and the landlords made a lot of money because they owned the land. Generally speaking, if you have tenants at home, that is, you can't grow your own land, so you can call it a small landlord if you contract it to someone else's family and then rent it to you.

Generally speaking, this kind of landlord class meets the landlord standard.

Life is still quite nourishing, but there must be a lot of money, and those who are very rich are called rich people.

Mr. Lu Xun's family used to be a landlord, he once wrote an article about the real life of his family when he was a child, there are still 20 acres of land left in the backward family, which can be enough for the expenses of more than 10 people in the family, but it is also very tight when encountering major events.

<>However, after the liberation, there was a period of time when the landlords were divided into land, and a large part of the landlords were actually ordinary people, who were classified as landlords for a long time because they were more diligent and saved more land than other villagers.

Many of the grandfathers and grandmothers of the little friends may have been classified as landlords, but the strength of this landlord has been greatly reduced, at best, it is enough to eat and drink, and there is no money.

There is more land, and when the farm is busy, it is all self-labor, and no one will be hired.

In the old society, the landlords had a lot of land, because the peasants could not get the land at that time, so the landlords had a lot of land, so many peasants worked for the landlords in order to live, so the landlords' money gradually increased.

There should be a lot of land and a lot of money. Landlords make money by renting their land to peasants to farm, and those who have a lot of money in their pockets are naturally very rich.

The landlords of the old society, of course, had a little more land. Because at that time, having land was equivalent to having money. So it's also very rich.

They owned a lot of land and money, and the landlords at that time generally controlled a large piece of land, and then the peasants gave them money to rent the land, and when they had a harvest, they had to provide some money, so they were not short of land or money.

Industrious people save food and use a little bit to buy the land of lazy people, and there are landlords and poor people every day.

Generations of peasants have been forcibly seized from generation to generation, and there has been collusion with the powerful.