Is it cost effective for farmers to farm their own land, or is it cost effective to contract out the

It is not certain whether it is cost-effective for farmers to farm their own land or whether it is cost-effective to contract out their land to go out to work, and it has a certain relationship with the peasants' own ideas and actual conditions. <>

The actual situation of each farmer is different, some farmers may be alone, so farming is actually more cost-effective, after all, they can keep themselves fed and clothed, and they can also have a little money left. But if the farmer has a wife to support or has children and grandchildren to raise, in this case, it is not very cost-effective to farm, because farming can only ensure that he can eat enough, but it cannot guarantee his next life. Moreover, some children are very sick and need money, so it is better to contract out the land and then go out to work, so that they can earn more money.

It should be noted that if you are a farmer, but the conditions at home are not particularly good, and you feel that there is not much future in farming, it is recommended that you go out to work, so that you can learn a trade, at least to ensure your own life. Don't just guard a piece of land, after all, life is the most important thing. <>

However, everyone's idea is different, there may be farmers who want to live a life in peace and stability, and they also want to live on this field, at this time if they want to farm their own land, it must be the most cost-effective, and they can also get a lot of protection. But if you don't want to be safe, but want to go out and break through, and you don't have much interest in farming, and you feel that farming can't guarantee your life, this time must be the best time to go out to work, and you can see the outside world more.

I also hope that you can decide whether to farm or go out to work according to your own ideas, as long as you don't regret it in the future. <>

Finally, I hope you can be cautious when thinking about it, and don't blindly follow other people's ideas, thinking that if others go out to work, then you have to go out to work, or you feel that others are farming, then you have to farm at home.

Of course, it is cost-effective to farm your own land, because the current price level is very high, and the demand for prices in the market is very large, and if you farm your own land, you can make a lot of money from it. But if you contract out the land, you can only get a few hundred or a few thousand yuan a year. Coupled with the fact that it is very competitive now, if your ability is not very strong, you will not be able to find a good job at all.

You can farm at the age of 60, but you don't want to work because you don't want to do it every day, three hours a day. Keep the foundation and pass it on from generation to generation.

The income of farmers from farming is relatively low, and they have to pay a lot of time and energy, and they can earn money by contracting out the land, and they can earn money by going out to work, so that they can earn double money, which is a relatively good choice for ordinary farmers.

It is cost-effective to go out, but now the income from farming in the countryside is too small to meet the needs of a family. Contracting out not only solves the pressure of farming, but also frees up time for other things.

Now that many farmers have gone out to work, what will happen to their land? For the rural workforce, more and more farmers are choosing to go out to work. In this case, will there be more and more wasteland in the countryside?

How can arable land be guaranteed in rural areas? We can't deny that the labor force in the countryside is indeed getting smaller and smaller, because a lot of people choose to go out to work, so there are very, very few people left. Let the peasants work in the city.

Does this mean that land in the countryside will be abandoned? So, with more and more people going out to work, does this mean that more and more rural land is being abandoned? In fact, the development of our country is quite good, because to solve this problem, rural peasants cannot farm in the countryside, but this has not caused the abandonment of rural land to become more and more serious.

According to our local situation. In the countryside, the wasteland is now almost invisible.

<> this situation, whether our land in the countryside is now, or is it planted by the peasants themselves, or has it been used up for a long time, so in this case, even if more and more people in the countryside go out to work, so they flow out of the land for others to go to the farm, and the phenomenon of land abandonment in that case has not become more and more serious. About 60 to 70 per cent of the land in rural areas is largely leased. In the countryside, as a self-employed farmer, he neither earns money nor much profit.

Therefore, he prefers to rent his land to others to plant and then work for us.

This way, you can get a better economic income without having to live in the countryside every day and earn nothing. So in this case, as long as the migrant workers are basically going to transfer their family's land. In fact, this is also a normal phenomenon.

It is actually possible to obtain good security for cultivated land within the countryside. Because now we encourage people to start businesses in the countryside, or develop the countryside.

The above is a detailed interpretation of the problem, I hope it will help you, if you have any questions, you can leave me a message in the comment area, you can comment with me, if there is something wrong, you can also interact with me more, if you like the author, you can also follow me, your like is the biggest help to me, thank you.

Land can be leased to other people for use in the form of contracts, and the two parties can sign a corresponding contract to charge the annual rent, or they can build some houses on the land.

Their land may be rented to other people for planting, or they may let their children farm. There are some elderly people who have nothing to do and can also go farming.

Their land is generally rented out to other farmers to make the land valuable.

This practice is very cost-effective, farmers can earn money to go out to work and make money, two-way harvest, can make farmers' lives richer, life will be better and better.

Of course, the more than 200 million peasants who have land and have not farmed for a long time are zoned here, but the problem is that there are still more than 300 million peasants who will farm for a living, so the consequences of land circulation are serious

I don't think it's worth it, the current epidemic is relatively serious, it's difficult to get out, and the salary outside is not high.

I think of course it is worth it, because this is equivalent to not farming, and there is at least one or two hundred thousand additional income per year.

Young and middle-aged people in the rural areas are reluctant to farm even if they go home to be idle, and they all say that farming is not cost-effective, and the number of young and middle-aged people who have returned to the rural areas to develop agriculture has indeed gradually increased in recent years. Because now the development of the countryside is gradually rising, there are preferential policies for the support and help of the three rural areas. Many young people, especially young people now, are reluctant to return to the countryside to earn money outside, in fact, there are various reasons.

Because many people want to make steady progress in their familiar industries. If you can't see a stable industry and a stable market, then it will be very difficult for you to invest in it at this time.

Because everyone knows that it is risky to go back to the countryside to start a business, and the risk is very high. So many people don't want to take risks, but they don't want to invest their hard work and their savings over the years in an industry that they are not very sure about. Land is the foundation of rural people, our older generation will farm and manage their own land, many years ago in the countryside went to the city to work because they did not want to continue the hard work of their parents.

But in fact, the outside is not suitable for everyone's development, and when you go back to the countryside, you can not do much in the countryside, or you don't know what you can do at all. After so many years of mixing in the city, and then going back to farming, I can't get by with a lot of face, and I don't know how to farm anymore.

Operating other high-value crops, this aspect of the technology is obviously not mastered by themselves, starting from scratch, this process is estimated that many people have already adapted. Recreational agriculture can only be done if it has enough money and time for the residents. If everyone is still having a headache to repay the mortgage, then there is still time to relax, make a little more money in the limited time, and pay off the mortgage early.

Young people don't make much money working outside the home, and people who are financially savvy may save a little money. If you are a big spender and don't owe debt, that's good. So it's really hard to get young people to go into an industry that has no prospects.

It shows that many young adults in rural areas feel that farming is not particularly good news, and they also feel that such behavior will affect their income and affect their lives, so they are unwilling.

I think it's very cost-effective to go home and farm, I can accompany my parents at home, I don't have to worry about my daily livelihood, I plant the land every day, raise pigs, grow vegetables, and fish when I am free.

Such an idea is actually incorrect, and farming is also a good way out, after all, the state is now subsidized.