Is lax management good or bad for college students?

I think the management of the university should be a gradual process from strict to lenient for freshman students, because from strict high school management to the university, relaxing all of a sudden will make students more problems under the extreme relaxation, and slowly relax in the sophomore year, because after a year of adaptation, college students should know what they want to do, what they should do, how they should deal with their study and life, in fact, the management of the university should be relaxed, However, because of the strict management received by middle schools and elementary schools, many students do not have the ability to manage themselves, so the management of universities will be.

The advantages outweigh the disadvantagesExample: The successful experience of foreign universities is only applicable to the maintenance of basic order, it is management. The implementation is very easy to be a formality, so that the management violates the original intention, freedom is a necessity for the development of personality, is a service, and truly for the sake of the educated, provided that respect, and recognize the diversity of development, I think it is beneficial to the university Compared with middle school students, college students will have a great improvement in ideological awareness and initiative, and generally will know what they want and how to get it, and if the school management is too strict, it will make students lack individuality and lack of innovative spirit The main thing about college is to cultivate personality Focus on what you are good at, and its disadvantage may be that some students who are not self-conscious will not be able to grasp the direction well, lose themselves in college, and live a chaotic life without being able to extricate themselves.

I think the pros outweigh the cons.

1. Relaxed management of college students can effectively improve their ability to handle affairs independently.

2. Relaxed management of college students can better cultivate the attitude of conscious learning.

3. The relaxed management of college students can cultivate the ability of self-study in combination with the actual situation.

4. Loose management of college students can better cultivate students' teamwork spirit.

5. Loose management of college students can establish students' sense of responsibility.

For example, the positive view is that "the benefits of loose management outweigh the disadvantages of college students." In the first part of the opening argument, Yang Wensheng directly pointed out that under the mode of loose management, the scientific and technological innovation ability of college students can be improved, and the implementation of loose management can enable college students to better adapt to the society after entering the society, and then demonstrate that loose management is more beneficial than disadvantageous to college students.

The opponent's argument is clear and sharp, dividing the entire college student group into three categories: strong self-control, average self-control and poor self-control. And taking the "Three Classifications of College Students" directly shows that college students with strong self-control account for a minority, and college students with average self-control and poor self-control account for the majority.

Then clinging to the lax management is a lack of guidance, which is detrimental to the latter two, that is, most college students. This shows the view that lax management does more harm than good to college students.

The free debate session was even more exciting. Debaters on both sides scrambled to speak, sat down together, and the fight was very lively. Although both sides argued over the title, the arguments between the two sides were still based on politeness, smiling at each other and shaking hands after the debate.

After a competition, after the judges' comments, everyone's experience in playing the competition has improved.

In the end, after the judges' determination, the positive side is better, and the typhoon side also has a slight advantage. Wei Linghui, the captain of the debate team, said: "Although both sides are playing for the first time, their performances are remarkable. ”

1. Relaxed management can better provide teachers and students with a relaxed and free academic atmosphere and academic environment, which is more conducive to cultivating college students' independent thinking and innovative spirit;

2. Relaxed management reduces the restrictions on the development of college students' personality in terms of ideology and environment, creates an academic and living environment for college students to maximize their potential, and brings greater benefits to the success of college students;

3. Loose management is not only conducive to college students to learn self-restraint, self-management, adapt to today's society in advance, adapt to independent social life, but also help college students to give full play to their potential and give full play to their own strengths.

Here's why lax university management can do more harm than good

First, lax management will lead to the loss of college students' awareness of rules. It is undeniable that liberal education can promote the personality development of college students, but college students have just come out of exam-oriented education, and the direct implementation of liberal education will cause college students to be unable to adapt to university life and lead to low efficiency in learning.

The management of society will only be stricter than that of universities, and college students under relaxed management will pay less attention to the rules, although the loose management satisfies their personality development, but when they enter the society, it will be more difficult to adapt to the society. Therefore, we believe that loose management is not conducive to the school providing more talents for the country and society.

Second, loose management has high requirements for the consciousness of the managed, which is not conducive to the development of most students. According to the law of 28 invented by the Italian economist Baledo, we are told that 20% of the world's outstanding people are good, and 80% are mediocre people.

The same is true for college students, 20% of college students have a strong sense of self-discipline, and can freely allocate time in this relaxed environment, improve themselves, and become better, while the remaining 80% of college students cannot make good use of their time to improve themselves due to insufficient self-discipline, and may even waste themselves.

It is undeniable that loose management can make good people better, but it makes mediocre people a stepping stone. The original intention of education is to enable all students to improve in an all-round way, so loose management is contrary to the original purpose of education. Therefore, we believe that lax management is not conducive to the school providing more talents to the country and society.

Third, the practice of loose management is uncertain. It is undeniable that lax management has allowed college students to have more time, but not necessarily more time to be used.

For example, it is true that you have a lot more free time on weekends than you would on a regular school day, but the time you use on weekends may not necessarily be as much as your regular school day, which is uncertain.