When you apply for a job, do you talk about your strengths or weaknesses first?

When you apply for a job, do you talk about your strengths or weaknesses first? For it, I will definitely say my own shortcomings first, because I think that no one is perfect is that people will always have shortcomings, to be able to know their own shortcomings, to know their own shortcomings is a great advantage, as the saying goes, people must have self-knowledge, we must know our own shortcomings and advantages, this is our basic quality of life. <>

We should be clear about our own shortcomings and let others know that we know our own shortcomings, so that they can know more clearly that they are self-aware and know what their shortcomings are? Let others know that you are a self-aware person, and others will look up to you even more <>

Humility attitude as soon as you come up to say your own shortcomings, it will reflect that you have a humble attitude to put yourself in a relatively low position, and then say your own advantages, so that others can look up to you, will make others feel that you are an honest person, so that you can also win the favor of others, so that others will be more willing to admit you, every company is willing to admit this kind of self-aware, know their own shortcomings, and will not show off their abilities of employees, so it's best to talk about your shortcomings at the beginning. <>

In general, when applying for a job, let others feel that you are a humble person, instead of showing off your own advantages, let others feel that you are a proud person, a noble attitude, so that others will not admit you, if you want to win the favor of others, you must first put yourself in a relatively low position, not domineering, show off your own advantages, when applying for a job, come up is to say your own shortcomings, say your own shortcomings, Then mention your own advantages a little, only in this way, when we apply for a job, we will have a greater chance of being accepted by others.

I'll talk about the pros first, and then the disadvantages. Because at the beginning of the job interview, the interviewer listens to what value your strengths can bring to them and what value you can bring to them, so talking about your strengths will make them remember you more.

Of course, I will start by talking about my strengths, because I want to make a good impression on the interviewer and hope that I can find a suitable job. If the interviewer didn't ask about the shortcomings, I don't think I would have offered it.

I will definitely start with my strengths and end with a little bit of disadvantages. Because I'm applying for a job, I need to make a good first impression first.

Pay attention to avoid the important and light, when talking about your own advantages, you can slightly exaggerate your own points, and when you talk about your own shortcomings, you should pay attention, don't really say your own shortcomings. You can talk about a little fault that is easy to correct. The purpose of the examiner interview is to select good employees for the company, which is their purpose.

Before answering, it is important for the candidate to clarify his or her response and make sure that he or she is speaking in a natural way, or at least not as unresponsive and slurred. The best answer is: What are the shortcomings?

Why the disadvantages? How can I improve?

2. Find out what the interviewer intended.

Before answering the interviewer's question, it is important to find out what the interviewer's intention is. In general, we can start with the time of the question, and the candidate can confirm that the interviewer is looking for their tolerance and honesty. Even so, candidates should not be able to take out all their shortcomings, but should selectively mention some irrelevant shortcomings, which is often conducive to the competition in the interview.

However, if the interviewer asks questions that are too abrupt or out of line with the interview etiquette, the candidate will need to use the interviewer's facial expressions to determine whether he or she has said something wrong.

3. Appropriate and clever expression.

Properly articulating one's shortcomings is often at the heart of solving this problem, and job seekers need to present their shortcomings as if they were the same thing and have another meaning. It is often not easy to achieve such an effect, which requires the candidate to prepare in advance, find his or her own shortcomings, and express them in a modified way, so that the shortcomings can be turned into strengths.

Fourth, don't avoid the important and trivialize.

Interviews provide an opportunity for a two-way communication between the company and the candidate, allowing the company and the candidate to get to know each other, so that both parties can make more accurate decisions about whether to hire or not.

Notes:

1. You can't say that the shortcomings that seriously affect the job you are applying for, for example, if you apply for a business position, you can't say that you don't like to travel.

2. During the interview, remember not to say that you don't want to go to work too far, and your health is not good. Then you hit a minefield.

With the increase in the number of interviews, the summary of the interviewer's shortcomings is becoming more and more homogeneous

1. I am too perfect to pursue.

This deficiency was mentioned at about the highest rate, with the participants saying that they were so particular about perfection that their colleagues and subordinates could not tolerate it, putting pressure on others, and that they should correct it in their future work. Now every time I hear this answer, I already feel nauseated, not to mention that I will have too much affection for the subject. The subject's answer in this way is nothing more than a disguised praise for himself, which is a question that "everyone knows".

2. I am impatient.

This deficiency sounds like a real personality shortcoming at first glance, but after listening to its explanation, I have to cry and laugh a little again. "I was in a hurry, and the leader assigned me a job, which could have been completed in three days, and I wanted to finish it in one day. In the future, we should correct the "boasting of ourselves."

3. Not enough to learn by yourself.

4. I don't pay much attention to family life.

Job seekers say they are workaholics, working overtime all day, delaying time with their families, affecting their physical and family lives. Finally, I don't forget to pay attention to it in my future work, but I can't do anything about it for the sake of work.

According to the author's experience, those who give such similar answers are often those who have little idea, or those who have weak analytical thinking skills, or those who have some analytical thinking ability, but are self-defeating. As a person who often acts as an interview examiner, I have long been familiar with these questions, and the effect can be imagined. Talking about your shortcomings in front of an interviewer is indeed a challenging question.

But to give such an answer shows that it is not the candidate's own idea at all, but has learned it from elsewhere. So it doesn't seem real. In fact, if it is a well-designed interview, the candidate will not be rated as a high score if he or she gives an untrue answer.

Therefore, if the interviewer asks the subject to talk about his or her shortcomings, he should still answer truthfully and not try to cover up anything. Objectively speaking, everyone has shortcomings, a confident person will also show his self-confidence when answering his own shortcomings, and a person who lacks courage will also expose his cowardice when talking about his own advantages. How can this question be answered well?

In addition to being realistic, it is very important to know how you treat your own shortcomings and what do you do about them? Lin Zexu knew that he was prone to anger, but he wrote a big "anger control" in the hall to encourage himself.

1. I am prone to disagree with people or things that I think are wrong, which leads to often offending people. This is missing though.

point, but illustrate you.

Rong is more assertive and principled;

2. I am in a hurry, and the accuracy is sometimes insufficient. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you can get the job done faster;

3. I'm not very good at communicating too much, especially when it is difficult to communicate with strangers. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you are cautious in making friends;

4. I am more rigid in my work, and sometimes it is easy to be more honest with people. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you are more compliant with the established work norms of the unit and have a certain principle;

5. I think more about the difficulties in my work, and less about asking colleagues or leaders for advice. Although this is a disadvantage, it shows that you have a strong ability to complete work tasks independently;

Sometimes if you can't shy away from saying that you don't have any shortcomings, you can't be too realistic and say all the shortcomings. First of all, never say fatal flaws, such as irresponsibility, carelessness, etc. Of course, you shouldn't say this yourself; Secondly, that is to say, some shortcomings that are not necessarily shortcomings, such as working hard, but not paying attention to the combination of work and rest, or the pursuit of quality in work, efficiency needs to be improved, or the scope of learning knowledge is not wide enough, and learning should be further strengthened, etc.; Finally, you have to express your position, analyze yourself carefully, treat your shortcomings correctly, and strive to improve and perfect.

Say something unimportant about the "shortcomings". "Disadvantages" are not the point of rolling silver. Everyone definitely has shortcomings, but they can't be the core competency requirements for this position.

For example, the executive ability of the senior management is not good, and the strategic management ability of the strategic level is insufficient. These are serious injuries. So what are some of your shortcomings?

For example, when interviewing a graphic designer, you can say that my previous work has always focused on the design of static floor plans. I sometimes feel uncertain when faced with a scene that requires dynamic effects, and I'm learning this technique myself. This doesn't mean that you're completely incompetent for the job, but it also shows that you're aware of your shortcomings and have improved through your studies.

Deficiencies at work refer to areas that need to be improved at work. For example, at work, business ability needs to be improved, then it can be understood that business ability is insufficient. Let's take a look at an example.

In my work, I realized that I still have many deficiencies: 1. For the tasks assigned by the leader, I am anxious, not capable enough, not comprehensive enough, not profound enough, although I can basically complete the tasks assigned by my superiors, but I feel powerless and lack of motivation in the face of difficulties and pressure in my work. 2. Sometimes the idea of dealing with problems is not clear enough, which makes the work more passive; There is also a lack of active exploration and innovation in the work carried out, and the coordination ability needs to be strengthened; 3. Lack of work experience, too impatient in the face of problems, bent on doing something and making some achievements, but lack of overall planning, not careful and thorough work, and the ways and means of work also need to be further guided and improved by leading colleagues.

It is also necessary to find the shortcomings in the work, learn to position yourself, and achieve the places where you need to improve in your work. For example, they are not proactive enough to treat their work, they are only satisfied with completing the tasks assigned by the leader, they encounter problems in their work, they are not good at thinking, they use their brains, and they often wait for the instructions of the leaders and say that they will take one step at a time. Lack of a sense of professionalism, thinking that some of the business knowledge I have can adapt to the current work, although I feel potential pressure and urgency, but lack of self-confidence, lack of courage to climb up and perseverance in studying hard and perseverance in the spirit and attitude of learning.

There is a lack of ability to implement the work done, and the exception is to encounter tedious and complex things in the work, with the mentality that it can be delayed, not today, just wait for tomorrow, and take the method of avoiding the problem, not to seek a solution, but to wait for the way to appear.

Here are some examples of how it is possible to lie during an interview, but I would like to emphasize again that such behavior is not recommended.

Misrepresentation of academic qualifications: You may exaggerate your academic qualifications in your resume or interview, such as misrepresenting your degree or school name, in order to boost your qualifications.

Exaggeration of work experience: You may exaggerate your work experience in your resume or interview, including the position, job description, project involvement, etc., to make yourself look more experienced.

False skills: You may exaggerate or fabricate your skills, such as saying that you have mastered a programming language or tool when you don't.

False reasons for leaving: Reasons for leaving may be fabricated during interviews, such as to cover up the real reason for being fired or fired.

False salary claims: You may misrepresent your salary expectations during interviews in order to get a higher salary.

Fictitious hobbies: You may fabricate your enthusiasm for certain hobbies in an interview to make yourself more attractive to the interviewer.

However, lying is not an advisable act. Once uncovered, it can lead to the loss of job opportunities and negatively impact an individual's professional reputation. Therefore, it is most recommended to ask honest and truthful questions in the interview and show your real abilities and experiences.

Of course, here are some more detailed information about lying in interviews:

False claims of peer competition: In a highly competitive industry, some job seekers may exaggerate their performance and accomplishments in order to gain an edge in interviews. For example, inflating sales performance, exaggerating customer relationships, inflating the size and impact of projects, etc.

False self-evaluations: Some job seekers may exaggerate their leadership skills, teamwork skills, problem-solving skills, etc., in interviews to make themselves appear better and suitable for the role.

Fictitious references: Some job seekers may make up fake references in order to increase their endorsement and credibility. For example, listing a friend or relative as a former employer or mentor, providing a fake reference letter or ** number.

Concealing negative information: Some job seekers may conceal negative information during the interview, such as previous job mistakes, the real reason for being fired or quitting, career gaps, etc., to avoid the interviewer having a negative impression of themselves.

False interests and motivations: Some job seekers may fabricate their interests and motivations for a company, position, or industry to cater to the interviewer's expectations rather than genuinely expressing their interests and motivations.

While lying may achieve some superficial advantages in the short term, the risks and negative effects may far outweigh its short-term benefits. Once discovered by employers, it may lead to the loss of job opportunities and even affect future career development. Therefore, in the interview, being honest and truthful about the questions and showing your actual abilities and experience is an important foundation for building professional integrity and professional reputation.