Is the thinking of the earthlings progressive, or is it wrong?

The concept of good and evil is related to the position and is likewise dialectical.

It is built on the basis of human sociality.

For example, actions that bring benefits to the majority of a group can be called good for the group, and vice versa.

Another example: if we put aside the social nature of human beings and treat individuals, it is that those who are good are good, and those who are evil are evil.

So apart from the position, it is impossible to judge good and evil, and it is impossible to judge progress or error.

In the same way, agreeing with a certain view of good and evil determines the position of a "person" to a certain extent.

Of course, with the development of human social communication and the popularization of information, the cognitive ability and cognitive level of human groups have been strengthened, and it is a kind of progress in ability to put aside the consistent and unchanged position of the past and understand a thing, a behavior, and a kind of ideological and moral system from other perspectives. If it is for an individual, it depends on the position of both the commenter and the person being commented.

As for the "earthling" perspective and ultimate care you mentioned, well, we can evaluate that the results of such thinking are usually more applicable and longer. But there's no need to take it too seriously, that kind of moral popularization needs to be built on the basis of the unity of human beings as a whole, hehe, it's a few hundred years before you say it.

The sages said, "When you start your heart, you are wrong, and when you move, you are obedient." ”

However, people cannot be without thoughts, and from this point of view, ideas that are beneficial to the masses are good, and ideas that are not beneficial to the masses are not good.

However, there are two sides to the story. For example, the positive effect of science and technology is to bring convenience to human beings, and the negative effect is to waste resources, destroy the earth's environment, and expand human desires.

Whimsical ideas and theories, but not necessarily 100% wrong, may be the way people eventually find out as technology advances, albeit with little chance of it.

At that time, the ecological environment of Mars was poor, the Martians invaded the earth, and the earth civilization was destroyed at a high speed.

That's why almost all earthlings are Martians, and almost all the planets are Martians.

Yes, humans immigrated from Mars. The sun is a burning planet, and the energy released is a process from large to small until it is depleted.

N billion years ago, the temperature of the Earth was very high and unsuitable for human habitation, and humans lived on Mars. Mars was at a moderate temperature at that time, around the average temperature, and humans were born in that environment.

In the year n billion years ago, the solar energy is decreasing, the temperature of Mars and the earth is decreasing, with a Mercury comet hitting the earth, the impact area is the formation of the current Pacific Ocean, the original whole region is a continent, was hit and divided, and the earth's orbit is hit away from a certain orbit of the sun, the earth's temperature is further reduced, the water system elements fill the earth, and the earth becomes suitable.

The Martians were highly technologically advanced and brought life to the earth, and later they emigrated some people themselves.

But now Mars is much better, and the stock of high-quality water resources alone has surpassed that of the current Earth.

However, if you want to immigrate to Mars, you need to prepare at least the best defense, because the earthlings who envy, envy and hate each other with higher priority will stop fighting each other and unite to prepare to occupy the Mars that has been developed, and if it fails, it will continue to level or destroy Mars. As always, human beings are materialistic "civilization"!

In the same way, the "paradise" expansion of the earth's underwater development will have a similar experience.

In the same way, the isolation development of space giant movable stations "369 and so on" is the same.

Many of these problems can be solved once and for all when people find that their DNA problems cause their minds to be affected and their minds are self-destructive, and they strive to repair their DNA to balance.

I believe that the progress of human society is not determined by anyone, but is an inevitable trend.

It is an instinct that people are always constantly improving the environment in which they live and constantly pursuing a better life. It is precisely this instinct of countless people that brings together that makes human society continue to move forward, so the forward development of human society is inevitable.

It is true that apes live without stress, but that is only because they are too ignorant, and if a person's life is only to solve their own survival problems, this kind of life is nothing to envy.

It is true that there are many problems in modern society, and there are many unsatisfactory aspects of people's lives, but we can't just see the bad aspects, right?

I think the biggest difference between modern society and primitive society is that people's spiritual world has been greatly enriched, and human beings no longer exist in this world just to maintain the most basic survival. This is where modern society is far superior to primitive society, and this is where the meaning of human social progress lies.

Progress has no purpose, although perhaps human beings will live better if they do not progress, but this is a game, in multiple human groups, some are progressing, and some are not, the part of progress is bound to live well, but the part that is not is bound to be miserable, although all progress will be very nervous, but as long as you stop first, then you are finished.

Human progress is to confirm the dreams that keep coming to our hearts, so sometimes don't feel like your whimsical ideas are ridiculous, maybe one day they can come true

To live better!

The reason you say this is nothing more than that there is too much pressure to survive right now. There are two sides to everything, and we cannot deny that we live more comfortably than ape-men, without worrying about fighting with jackals, tigers and leopards tomorrow, and without worrying that tomorrow's plague will lead to the extinction of the race.

There is only one purpose, to improve the standard of living.

It's just to survive, to survive better.

I'm not sure this is progress, maybe it's going to perish.

But the human category has no choice but to follow this path.

Human progress is for the sake of human beings' own interests, desires.

However, the ultimate goal is to bring humanity to extinction.

When I finally met someone who thought the same as me, I thought it was meaningless, but all of my people said that I wouldn't say that unless I was crazy Yes, now I have to run for life, and I have to keep studying, and I am still much behind other countries, which is really a human sorrow It's good to have no pressure, but if that's the case, can we still do this leisurely Internet access? And worry about whether I'm going to die or not. Actually, looking back, there are a lot of things that make sense, at least we need to be happier, and that's what I found after my friend's persuasion. Actually.

The world is still very beautiful, Sissy Do you say yes? >

In order to leave proof of their existence

Some people strive to promote human progress in pursuit of the ideal of human progress, and some people passively promote progress for the sake of survival and profit. All life wants to have a more suitable living environment for itself, and this is especially true of human beings, the highest intelligent beings on the earth. Changing the future, making our lives better and surviving is a sustainable development goal.

The resources will be depleted, the earth will be destroyed, the universe ... Human beings can only survive forever by constantly creating and discovering, and the fundamental basis for this is that society must progress.

Everyone has pressure, but if you can think more about it, it will dissolve the pressure or become the driving force, as for the ape, it can only be said that in such a harsh primitive state, the ape life exists in an unintentional and dying environment.

I also used to think how nice it would be to go back to an agrarian society, where there were no large-scale wars and no air pollution.

But if you think about it, the further back you go, the easier it is for humans to survive and the harder it is to fight the environment.

Do you think apes are stress-free? Hunting and gathering for a living, and starving to death if you can't find anything to eat for a few days! You have to fight hard to save your life when you encounter a beast, have you ever tried to feel like you are being chased and run to the point where you are about to die?

Not to mention what volcano **, there is no forecast, you are unlucky.

In the final analysis, the continuous progress of human society is to create a better life for ourselves, and as for the negative impact brought about in the process, we will try to eliminate it.

1. Human progress is an objective law, not something that can be easily changed by individuals. It is impossible to try to deny the law!

2. Human progress is the subjective ideal of human beings and themselves, and human beings can only survive by continuous progress, otherwise they will be eliminated and extinct by nature! Human progress also makes human beings live better.

Note: The average life expectancy of people in primitive societies is only a few teenagers, and the landlord is probably dead at this age. Hearing this news, the landlord will no longer think that modern times are inferior to primitive times, right? ）

3. Human progress has made human cognition stronger. Human progress has enabled people to have higher ideals, that is to say, human progress has made human beings more aware of the importance of progress. (Ref. Dialectics).

As the highest life form on the earth (and even the universe), human beings represent the direction of progress of the earth (and even the universe). The progress of humanity is both necessary and necessary.

Six words: innovation! Develop!! Survive!!!

In order to be alive, in spite of this, in fact, who would want to be an ape-man.

You can live the life of an ape-man and try it to see if it's good or not.

Progressive. The reason why the development process of science and technology is the process of human beings themselves realizing one idea after another, if human beings are creatures who pursue progress, then the science and technology realized is the science and technology that promotes human progress. Throughout the development of science and technology, the development of human science and technology has continuously led human beings to comprehend the laws of the universe and use these laws to serve themselves.

The laws of the universe have existed since the birth of the universe, and after the emergence of human beings, they began to discover and use these laws, and it can be said that human beings have made progress in understanding the universe every step they have taken.

Since they are all progress, how can there be a discussion topic of "progress" and "regression"? I think there is a situation that we ignore when we talk about progress, most of us talk about progress from a macro perspective, and when we talk about regression, we mostly give examples of specific phenomena, and in turn use specific regression to counter macro progress, which will lead to the wrong conclusion that it covers the whole with partiality.

Some people say that the development of communication technology has facilitated communication and realized the benefits of efficient remote information exchange, which is a great progress for mankind. Many people begin to ignore family affection because they have mobile phones, and they have become a group of people who bow their heads, not to mention their estranged feelings, and are prone to car accidents, which is a regression. But is it a regression?

In the old days, even if the relatives who rode the cow skewers had a means of transportation, even if they were distributed from Beijing to Cangzhou, the girl who married far away may not be able to return to her parents' home several times in her life, so this is close. Most of the arguments about "regression" are the misuse of "progressive" technology, rather than the inevitability caused by technology itself.

There is also a form of "regression", such as the development of science and technology that made mankind understand atomic energy and created the atomic bomb. This atomic bomb, in the case of preventing a meteorite from hitting the earth, is the only method that mankind can use at present. In this way, it is easier for everyone to agree that technology allows us to "progress".

However, the atomic bomb falling on the earth, scorched earth everywhere, can make a highly developed country immediately return to the age of cold weapons, I think some people will say that this is a complete "regression".

The philosophical view of dialectical materialism proves that man should conquer nature!

Things are constantly changing and evolving, and human beings are the most advanced creatures, representing and leading the direction of nature's development!

There are universal contradictions in things, and there must be unfavorable factors in nature. Because human beings are the most advanced things, representing the development of the earth (and even the universe); Therefore, all the factors in nature that are unfavorable to human beings are secondary and negative aspects of contradictions, and human beings should conquer and destroy them!

Human beings should make use of the factors in nature that are favorable to mankind and eliminate the factors that are unfavorable to human beings. So man should conquer nature! This is an inevitable trend in the development of human beings and nature!

All the ideas that human beings should make concessions and compromises with nature are negative, backward and wrong!

Humans should not only conquer nature, but also conquer it!

Humans are the only beings with true "intelligence". Human beings can take advantage of the law and exert their subjective initiative to overcome the unfavorable factors in nature! Only the unthinkable, there is nothing that cannot be done, it is a true portrayal of human ability!

In ancient times, human beings worshipped nature, for example, at that time, people believed that thunder was the wrath of the gods, and at that time, human beings did not represent the most advanced development direction of things; When human civilization developed and became the most advanced thing, human beings began to use nature and conquer nature. Now we can basically control nature, for example, now people can artificially rain!

Whether it is the plundering of resources and the destruction of the environment in modern times, or the protection of resource regeneration and environmental protection now, it is just a means for human beings to conquer nature. The idea that human beings should give way to nature is as backward as ancient humans! The idea that man should conquer nature is progressive and correct!

In fact, there is no absolute answer to this question.

As long as you name a good reason.

However, I feel that it should be appropriately reserved.

Because of the idea that man wants to conquer nature.

It is certainly an upward spirit.

A spirit of pursuit.

Nor should it be completely abandoned.

However, it is only so said that it is properly reserved.

That said, it's not entirely possible.

Man and nature have an inseparable relationship.

Life comes from nature.

In terms of reason and ability.

Humans cannot conquer nature.