How to be a three debater? Whether the open book is beneficial or not, the debate will be opposed .

Live reading, live reading! Just don't read bad books! If only people who read books know what is good and what is bad, and can think, study and innovate in the case of opening the book and reading a wide range of books, and use it as an ideal and strive for the nation, it will be beneficial, and on the contrary, it will be useless and harmful!

Open books are not necessarily beneficial is a general term that refers to a variety of books and articles. There are all sorts of useful good books and harmful, useless books. Reading good books is naturally beneficial, but reading the wrong book is not only not beneficial, but will poison your physical and mental health.

Therefore, opening the book is not necessarily beneficial.

If you open the book blindly, it may not be beneficial.

People who can read all kinds of books are afraid that they can't do anything. This famous saying is that a person who reads everything can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may behave badly.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine."

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

Although it is an idiom that opening the book is beneficial, I insist that if the book is opened blindly, it may not be beneficial.

People who can read all kinds of books are afraid that they can't do anything. This famous saying is that a person who reads everything can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may behave badly.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine."

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

The opening statement of the first debate, the time is three minutes, to clearly put forward your point of view, the theory can be less examples, and the other debate should be a one-and-a-half-minute summary of the attack and defense after the end of the defense, mainly to pick out the opponent's mistakes, summarize part of the field, and prepare part of the field.

The second and third arguments are mainly used for offensive defense, the second argument of the positive side first selects the second argument of the opposing side or the third argument to attack and argue, the questioner can only ask but not answer, the answerer is the same, the question time is a total of 30 seconds, and the answer time is a total of one minute and 30 seconds. Then the second argument of the opposing side chooses the second and third arguments of the positive side, the third argument of the positive side chooses the second and third arguments of the opposing side, and the third argument of the opposing side chooses the second and third arguments of the positive side. Then there is the summary of the attack and defense mentioned earlier, followed by the free debate session, where all 4 debaters can answer, starting with the positive side first, and each side has 5 minutes each. At this time, 4 should speak more.

The first debate needs to have a clear concept, be able to clearly express the basic views of the party, and be very sober. Eloquence doesn't have to be outstanding, but it's used to grasp the basics. Especially in free debate, it is necessary to stick to the bottom line of our own side.

The second argument needs to be able to clearly identify the opponent's fundamental mistakes, and the firepower should be strong and the rhetoric should be sharp. Especially in free debate, try your best to break through the opponent's bottom line.

The three debates are the most demanding, requiring outstanding eloquence and knowledge, especially quick response, and being able to grasp the opponent's loopholes and change their own strategies in an instant. The three debates are the protagonists of free debate, and they should assume greater responsibility. The quality of the three debates almost determines the success or failure of the game.

The fourth debate needs to be calm and calm, have a big picture, and almost play the role of a coach on the field, controlling the game of his team. The ability to summarize, summarize, and incite the four debates should be strong enough. A good four debates can have a few sentences in a free debate, but they all poke at the opponent's death hole.

Especially when summarizing the statement, it is necessary to have a very strong insight and incitement, directly hit the key points of the other party, and arouse the approval of the judges.

The most important thing is to prepare before the game, as well as the reaction on the spot (find out the opponent's weaknesses in time and give a counterattack) The four arguments should also pay attention to combining the opponent's weaknesses with their own theories, and finally, the most important thing is the strength and demeanor of the speech. It is desirable that the scope of the argument should be broad.

Summarize the attack and defense, point out the loopholes of the other party in a certain meaning link, briefly state our point of view, and emphasize it.

The second debate and the third debate are closely related to the argument prepared in the offensive and defensive links. Make the meaning of the argument vivid and the understanding further.

The four arguments are to further consolidate one's own viewpoint and point out the loopholes of the other side. The language of the summary argument should be beautiful.

In fact, a debate competition is a building, and a debate is the cornerstone. The second and third arguments are the main part of the house. The conclusion of the first argument is to further consolidate this architectural framework. The fourth argument is to decorate the building. Return.

Regarding the "first debate", "second debate", and "third debate" in the debate competition, there are two perspectives: one is from the perspective of "primary and secondary": the first debate is the "main debate", which is often the "main force" of one side of the debate, the second debate is the "reserve", and the third debate is the "supplementary hand".

Second, in terms of "the content of the debate": the first debate is to "explain the position", that is, something like "disagree with the other party's point of view" or "disagree", etc., which is often explained in one sentence. The second argument is "basis", that is, the method of enumerating data and examples is used to support the "first argument", and the third argument is the explanation of "supplement" or "amendment and improvement".