The opening of the book is necessarily useful evidence for the debate, and the opening of the book i

Although it is an idiom that opening the book is beneficial, I insist that if the book is opened blindly, it may not be beneficial.

People who can read all kinds of books are afraid that they can't do anything. This famous saying is that a person who reads everything can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may behave badly.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he understands that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine."

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

Opening the book is not necessarily beneficial, because we think that some people have read a lot of books, but they have not learned the good ones, and they have learned a lot of the bad ones. We think that open books are not necessarily beneficial, because we feel that there are many books on the market today with unhealthy content, and they cannot play any role in human development at all, but have a negative impact. We believe that people now read, and only selective reading can gain something, and those indiscriminate reading are useless to increase people's talents.

This point of view supports that knowledge is only useful when you learn the brain, and you can't always have a book in your daily life and talking to others.

The dependence is too strong, when you are working, the boss asks you to make results in a certain period of time, and he will not ask you to report the books to look for it, show a little, don't starve yourself.

Do you want to explain whether it is a positive or negative side!!

More points of positive arguments! Much more powerful.

Annan, ah, ah, ah