Li Jiaqi was fined for falsely advertising anti hair loss shampoo, and the result of a fine of 10,00

Nowadays, the Internet is developing rapidly, and our daily life is closely related to the Internet. I believe everyone has heard of live streaming, which is a new way to sell goods, bloggers use their influence to drive fans to buy goods, so that the sales of products are very large. Speaking of bringing goods, I believe many people know Li Jiaqi, he is a beauty blogger who is really capable of bringing goods.

When selling lipstick, he often tries it on himself. Li Jiaqi was fined 10,000 yuan for falsely advertising anti-hair loss shampoo. As soon as this news came out, many netizens felt that such a punishment was too small.

But some netizens said, "The function of preventing hair loss does not mean that it can be effective as soon as it is used, but this fine still has to be paid, after all, it has involved false publicity." "Let me tell you what I think! <>

In fact, there are many bloggers in the live broadcast room who bring goods that involve false publicity, but many consumers will not report it because of this, unless the goods purchased are very high. Li Jiaqi is selling a shampoo this time, in the live broadcast room, he said that this shampoo has an anti-hair loss effect, but the user does not have this effect after washing, and the consumer also reported to the relevant departments through **, feeling that this is a false advertisement. Therefore, a fine of 10,000 yuan is reasonable.

This can also serve as a warning. 10,000 yuan may be a small amount for big bloggers, but their reputation will definitely be affected. <>

Simba's bird's nest incident has also caused heated discussions on the Internet, but this fine is very heavy, you can search for the specific situation on the Internet, but these two natures are not the same. Live streaming is a new trend, and many merchants are also profiting in this way. However, bloggers must not be false when promoting, which will have a great impact on their reputation.

Now the relevant departments are also very strong in the supervision of live broadcast arrivals, so merchants and bloggers should not have a fluke mentality. <>

The above is the opinion, of course, some people think this is unreasonable, of course, there are their reasons. Do you think so?

I think it's unreasonable, these false propaganda anchors should cancel their live broadcast qualifications, otherwise they will only be fined a little money, they don't care at all, maybe which product they will falsely promote, consumers can't prevent it at all.

I think it's reasonable. Because the relevant departments punished Li Jiaqi according to his behavior and the damage caused, he was punished in accordance with the law.

Li Jiaqi was fined 10,000 yuan for falsely advertising anti-hair loss shampoo, which I think is quite reasonable. After all, he made more than 10,000 yuan from this. So it's fine.

I think it's reasonable. Because it is illegal to advertise false goods, they should be punished accordingly so that they can know their mistakes.

Reasonable, no matter how much the fine is, it is reasonable, the existence of these anchors with goods has stirred up the market a little chaotic, as a big V selling fakes, it is appropriate to be fined.

Li Jiaqi's store was fined 10,000 yuan for falsely advertising an anti-hair loss shampoo, and Li Jiaqi sold a shampoo named Fischko in the live broadcast room. But in fact, Fischkopf shampoo does not have relevant certification to show that it does have the function of preventing hair loss, so Li Jiaqi is false publicity, so he was fined 10,000 yuan. <>

After being professionally certified, Fischkop's shampoo found that it does not contain ingredients that can prevent hair loss in humans, so it is a complete rumor that it can prevent hair loss. Many shampoos are advertised, regardless of whether they have an anti-hair loss function, they like to write this function on the product flyer, and then many people may be tempted to see the anti-hair loss function, and then they will rush to buy it. But in fact, there are many so-called anti-hair loss shampoos, which have no anti-hair loss ingredients at all, and there is no way to have a little effect on our human hair loss.

Many times, when we buy those anti-hair loss shampoos, even if we find that those shampoos are not effective, we may think that it is our own problem and not the problem of the shampoo. When we buy those so-called anti-hair loss shampoos, we must determine whether the shampoo really has anti-hair loss ingredients, and whether it is falsely advertised by the merchant. If it is a false advertisement, we can report the merchant through formal channels and obtain our own compensation.

And the Fischko shampoo sold in Li Jiaqi's store was also removed from the shelves because it was reported by others, and then Li Jiaqi was fined 10,000 yuan. <>

The shampoo promoted by Li Jiaqi has no way to prevent hair loss, and if it really can, it will not be reported and fined. Now Li Jiaqi has taken this shampoo off the shelves, but other Fischkom is still selling it under the guise of preventing hair loss, so we must keep our eyes open when buying products and not be deceived.

This product cannot prevent hair loss, it can only be said to protect hair, so it is false advertising.

This shampoo can't prevent hair loss, and Li Jiaqi's false propaganda behavior is very shameful, and he will do whatever it takes for his own interests.

I don't think this shampoo can prevent hair loss. To be precise, there is no shampoo that can prevent hair loss, at most it can reduce hair loss. But he said that it was anti-hair loss, which was obviously false propaganda.

This shampoo is not shedding-proof. Because it has been proven to be false propaganda, indicating that there is no such effect, he was fined.

Shampoo is not a medicine, so it does not have the effect of hair loss. Therefore, all shampoos on the market have no effect on preventing hair loss, but only play a psychological role. The right way is to go to the hospital.

Shampoos are not able to prevent hair loss, everyone will have hair loss every day, this is a normal phenomenon, if the loss is serious, it is recommended to seek medical attention.

I think that this shampoo has no effect on preventing hair loss, it is just a marketing gimmick.

It is not possible to prevent detachment at all. According to the test of the relevant institutions, this product does not prevent hair loss at all, so it will be fined and punished.