Is academic qualifications a measure of talent? Let s debate 25

That's right, academic qualifications aren't the only measure of talent. There is a person with a high degree of education and a person with a low degree of education to an enterprise and an institution together.

Go and apply. When they walked into the door of the unit, a plastic bag flew out of nowhere and the plastic bag happened to fall in front of them, and then the highly educated person walked in as if he didn't see it, and the person with a lower education slowly bent down to pick up the plastic bag, and then threw it into the garbage bin next to it. In the end, the application was over, and the person with a higher education was not hired, and the person with a lower education was hired by the unit.

The reason is that the person with a low academic background, although his education is low, he has a high quality and knows how to maintain the image and appearance of the unit.

Of course not, if there is a degree is a talent, then there are not many talents in today's society, why undergraduates, master's students, etc. can't find a job, and even some undergraduate students go to vocational schools after graduation?

Academic qualifications can only represent a person's past, or how hard he studied in the past, not the present, and it is impossible to measure whether he can become a talent in the future. If you want to talk about academic qualifications, for today's people, many college students can easily get them, does this mean that he is a talent? And for those who only graduated from elementary school and junior high school, but still haven't forgotten their dreams, worked hard for them, started their own businesses with perseverance, and haven't forgotten to realize their social value, are they considered talents?

So rhetorically, how is talent defined?

Academic qualifications are only a representative of a person's learning ability, a person has many kinds of abilities, learning ability is only one of them, whether a person becomes a talent is first of all the moral level and personal quality as the standard, if the wrong only academic degree and knowledge level as a measure of talent, it will only add countless Hideo Murai (the maker of sarin in the Tokyo sarin incident).

Just a reference, not a standard. Talent should not only look at knowledge, but also look at people and things, and look at comprehensive ability.

There are still a lot of people with academic qualifications and inability. Just like most college students nowadays have academic qualifications, right? But there is too little social experience! Therefore, academic qualifications are only one of the many criteria for measuring people.

For a company, it is very important to be able to recruit capable people. But how to judge whether a person has talent and the size of talent is a more complex problem. In real life, although companies attach importance to the actual ability of candidates, they still do not ignore the level of their academic qualifications in recruitment.

On the surface, this is contradictory, but in essence it is plausible. The reason why enterprises regard high education as an important basis for selecting talents is not that enterprises do not pay attention to the ability of candidates, on the contrary, this choice itself is a manifestation of attaching importance to their ability. Because for enterprises, it is difficult to understand each candidate in a limited recruitment time; Although a person's educational background does not indicate his or her ability, it can show that the person has a good and formal educational background.

Here, the signal sent by academic qualifications to enterprises is that those with academic qualifications are more likely to be a talent than those without academic qualifications.

Of course, it is entirely possible for a worker who has not received any formal education and training to have very good potential, even higher than that of someone with academic qualifications; But before a company accepts him, there is a lack of a reasonable, authoritative proof of this ability. In particular, when the worker and the highly educated person are interviewed together, it is difficult for the worker to have a clear position and signal to the company to show that he is a talent; Those with a high degree of education at least indicate that he is a successful person in the education stage, and to a certain extent, it represents a higher level of comprehensive quality and knowledge, which can be recognized by the enterprise before his personal ability is better verified.

Xuefeng calendar inversion refers to the fact that employees in certain positions have higher education than their superiors or managers, which is very common in modern society. Some people think that academic qualifications are inverted and a waste of talents, because these highly educated employees may feel dissatisfied and unable to give full play to their talents and abilities, resulting in losses for themselves and Liangchang enterprises.

However, not all academic qualifications are a waste of talent. Some of the highly educated employees in the positions are able to make full use of their professional knowledge and skills to contribute to the development of the company. At the same time, these employees also have the opportunity to improve their comprehensive quality and management ability through learning and further education, and lay a solid foundation for future career development.

Therefore, the inversion of academic qualifications itself is not a waste of talents, the key lies in how to give full play to the potential and advantages of employees, and create a good environment and opportunities for the common development of enterprises and employees.