The criterion by which to judge whether something is new or not

Updated on parenting 2024-05-14
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The criterion for judging whether a thing is new or not: whether it is something that conforms to objective laws, has strong vitality and has great prospects.

    New things refer to things that conform to the objective laws and forward trends of the development of things, and have strong vitality and great prospects. New things are invincible, which is determined by the nature of the development of things and the nature of new things. New things and old things in the philosophical sense are not defined by the time when things appear, but are distinguished by whether they conform to the objective law of the development of things, whether they have strong vitality and great prospects.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Criterion: whether it is consistent with the inevitable trend of historical development.

    Explanation: The basic trend of natural, social and human development is that new things are constantly being produced and old things are constantly perishing, and metabolism is a universal law of movement in the universe that is not subject to human will. The so-called new things refer to things that conform to the direction of historical progress and have great prospects, while on the contrary, old things are things that gradually lose their inevitability of existence in the course of historical development and are dying out day by day.

    To identify whether a thing is new or old, the most fundamental thing is to see whether it conforms to the inevitable trend of historical development, and not only to look at the order of its appearance, nor to see whether it is novel in form, and what is recognized by the majority of people is not necessarily new.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The new is superior to the old. The new thing negates the decay and obsolescence of the old thing, absorbs and develops the positive elements of the old thing, and adds new content that cannot be accommodated in the old thing. So to see if things are superior to old things, if they are, they are new, and if they are not, they are not new.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Answer] A Answer Analysis] Test Question Analysis: New things are things that are in line with the development trend of things and have great prospects for development, and old things are things that deviate from the development trend of things and are declining day by day, so the criterion for distinguishing old and new things is whether they are in line with the inevitable trend of the development of things, so option A is correct;Option BCD is incorrect and is excluded;The answer is A.

    Test Points: This question tests the knowledge of the criteria for distinguishing between the new and the old.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The criteria for judging something new can be considered from different angles, including the following:

    Feasibility: whether the new thing can be realized and implemented, and whether it meets the actual situation and social needs.

    Innovation: Whether the new thing is unique and innovative, whether it can bring new thinking and development opportunities.

    Sustainability: whether the new thing can survive and play a role for a long time, and whether it can adapt to different environments and times.

    Social benefits: whether the new thing has a positive impact and contribution to society, economy, environment, etc.

    Ethics: Whether the new thing meets ethical and moral standards, and whether it will cause ethical and moral problems for human beings.

    Different new things may be judged by different standards, and the judging criteria need to comprehensively consider various factors and make judgments and decisions based on the actual situation.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I haven't seen it, I don't know it, I haven't touched it.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The erroneous view of judging whether a thing is new or not is that something that comes later is something new.

    New things are things that conform to objective laws, have strong vitality and great prospects, and this is the fundamental criterion for judging old and new things, and judging old and new things is not based on the chronological order of appearance, novel form, and strength as the criterion. So this view is wrong.

    The basic meaning of the new: deviating from established dogma or what is practical; Something different from the existing form. Encyclopedia Interpretation: Connotation From a philosophical point of view, new things refer to things that conform to the objective laws and trends of the development of things, and have strong vitality and great prospects.

    In the philosophical sense, the new things and the old things are not defined by the time when things appear, but are distinguished by whether they conform to the objective law of the development of things, whether they have strong vitality and great prospects.

    The new is relative to the old. Anything that conforms to the inevitable trend of the development of things, has strong vitality and a bright future is a new thing. Otherwise, it's the old thing.

    The fundamental criterion for distinguishing between the old and the new is not the order of their appearance, the strength of their strength, or the novelty of their forms, but whether they conform to the inevitable trend of historical development.

    At the beginning of the creation of the new, it is always imperfect and weak, but in the struggle against the temporarily strong old, it will eventually win. Because the new thing conforms to the inevitable trend of historical development, it sprouts and arises from the old thing, and it is the "promotion and abandonment" of the old thing, that is, it abandons the negative, outdated, and decadent factors in the old thing, absorbs the positive and rational factors in the old thing, and forms its own characteristics.

    Compared with the old things, the new things are more perfect, more advanced, more superior, and have stronger adaptability, so it is inevitable that the new things will inevitably replace the old things.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The wrong view to judge whether something is new or not is ().

    a.According to the order in which it appears in time.

    b.Root mill sail according to whether its form is novel.

    c.Depending on whether its power is strong or not.

    d.Whether it conforms to the inevitable trend of the development of things.

    e.Whether it has a strong vitality and a broad development prospect.

    Correct answer: ABC

Related questions
2 answers2024-05-14

The center is to do so by a creative person.

8 answers2024-05-14

It's called analogy! Analogy is an ancient method of cognitive thinking and speculation, which is to classify unknown or uncertain objects with known objects, and then make guesses and analyses about unknown and uncertain objects.

27 answers2024-05-14

Thoughts cannot be eliminated. It's better to let it go with the flow and let it fade slowly over time.

21 answers2024-05-14

The hot springs in our hometown and Ailian, who said that they can represent our hometown, are only national hot spring tourist attractions, one is Zhou Dunyi's Ailian.

4 answers2024-05-14

Imagine good words. 1. Meditation, thinking, hypothetical, weird. >>>More