Debate Tournament Whether climate warming is an inevitable product of industrial civilization the o

It's not that the other side will lose, but as your side, it's a little difficult.

First of all, after three revolutions in industry, the first two were dominated by burning fossil fuels, so it is said that it will definitely exacerbate climate warming, which is the leading reason.

But, in the same way, we do not develop industry, we have a growing population, we need land and housing, therefore, the destruction of ecology and the felling of trees, the pollution of water bodies will also increase, therefore, it will increase the intensity of climate warming.

Or according to what you have learned, find some other reasons to prove that industry is the leading factor, not necessarily, in the debate, first of all, we must admit the negative impact of industry, but we must pay attention to the rational use of industry, reasonable damage to the ecology, in this way, in order to reduce the speed of climate warming, it can also be said that we can use industry, to promote some measures to protect the environment, to show that industry not only destroys the climate, but also protects the environment, and this is the only way.

Is this still worth arguing? The opposing side will lose.

The emergence of human beings is a mistake, and what is the result? It will eventually perish! It's just a matter of time! If the resources are used up quickly, they will perish quickly, and they will perish slowly! The result is still perdition.

I think the only way out is to point out what is the product of global warming, and that this "what" is not necessarily related to industrial civilization, so that is the only way to say, otherwise, I don't think there is a solution to this problem.

I don't see any use for Western festivals in terms of foreign garbage and cultural invasion in China. Do foreign devils understand Chinese culture, and don't understand what is the use of importing.

If you were the right one, what would you base your argument on? What are the loopholes in this argument? Think the opposite! If you want to talk to me, I can try to talk to you! Ha ha!

Positive, yes, civilized are the manifestations of good qualities A person with good qualities is welcome no matter what circle of life they are in.

On the contrary, if you are not civilized, it will affect you, and on the contrary, there will be troubles in life.

Opposite, no, there is no civilization Or do you still live What do you live for? Of course, it's not civilization, it's enjoying life in the best of environments, and incivility has no effect on that.

The general public will definitely talk about the greenhouse effect, carbon dioxide, methane and other so-called greenhouse gases. However, some scientists currently believe that it doesn't matter... I support the opposing view, and there is no need to worry about the transition between glacial and interglacial periods on the earth.

First of all, define what it is, just look it up yourself, there are two things to pay attention to, one is "key", and the other is "language".

Key means the most important, the most important; Language, if it is beneficial to you, is defined in a broad sense, including not only what is said by the mouth, but also body language. Then, the definition of civilized etiquette, try to be as harmonious as possible, it is best to be able to find things such as "civilized etiquette, refers to the quality of a person through speech, action, etc., self-cultivation, etc.", there is no suspense about the outcome of the game if there is such a definition to support it.

It is argued at two levels, from the individual level: a person's civilized etiquette is embodied through language (in a broad sense), and from the social level: civilized etiquette is manifested in society, which must be realized through interpersonal communication, that is, language.

It is true that other factors also affect civilized etiquette, but this debate topic discusses the "key" The general framework is like this, and filling in n words is a debate draft

People are lazy, and they are not happy to check the information or something, so ask me if you have any questions.

Civility and politeness are an act.

First, there is civilized etiquette in the student code of conduct.

Etiquette comes from a literal interpretation and the meaning of ancient rites.

Only words without action, civilized etiquette is empty, for example, sorry but the behavior does not express this sorry, it is very pale, and language needs to be matched with body and eyes to achieve the meaning of its expression.

Civilized etiquette is an action. I think civilized etiquette lies in action.

Shanzhai is the killer weapon of the violent industry, and Shanzhai is deeply loved by the people; Cottages are new things, and all new things will always be strangled by the dilapidated evil forces; The old forces, fearing their own demise, will do their best to stifle the new; But new things are usually strong in vitality, so the world in the future is destined to be a world of "copycats".

Pop Culture:

The value of popular culture is to meet the cultural needs of the people, and its role is to enrich the cultural life of the people.

Today, our view is that the value of popular culture works is greater than the value of classic cultural works. As we all know, culture is a thing that is constantly developing and changing, and it is the external manifestation of a nation or a group's own values and attitudes towards the world. A cultural work is an expression that embodies a certain culture.

Popular culture, on the other hand, refers to the pursuit of culture by contemporary people, which is a culture in the present tense and a culture in which people are creating changes. Classical culture, on the other hand, refers to a culture that has been handed down from a part of the essence of past culture, but it is not a culture created by contemporary people. Value refers to an inner vitality and influence.

Therefore, I believe that the value of popular culture works is greater than the value of classic cultural works. The greater than this is not a simple long-term comparison of time or the longevity of vitality, but should be viewed from the perspective of which culture can better reflect and express the ideological needs of contemporary people.