How to deal with the teacher who temporarily matches good students and poor students in the final ex

Why do teachers who are role models create conditions for students to cheat in the final exam? Who is the most nervous person about the final exams of the primary semester? Not parents, not students, but teachers.

Before the exam, the teachers will take great pains to arrange the students' seats, one with a good score behind the other with a bad one, and the teacher will say something from time to time to "focus on the overall situation", "focus on the honor of the class", or explicitly imply that students "help each other" during the exam. <

Many students and parents can't understand that this is still the strict teacher we usually see, the teacher who is a model teacher? Why do teachers make students cheat, and make careful arrangements for this, and carefully create the conditions.

At present, the final exam results are not announced to students, and parents can only guess their children's usual performance from the teacher's vague encouraging comments, and roughly know their children's grades from the "good and bad" grade evaluations.

However, the evaluation of teachers is based on the students' final exam results, and the average class score and pass rate are calculated. The average score and passing rate are accurate to two decimal places. The overall ranking of the class subjects is determined based on the comprehensive ranking of the average score and pass rate, which is used as the standard for the teacher's work performance.

The ranking directly determines the teacher's evaluation and performance salary.

situation. Why don't teachers pay attention? So the final exam is not so much about the students as it is about the teachers. <>

Bad money drives out good money.

The atmosphere of the final semester exams slowly became a bit bad, first one or two teachers used some unconventional means in the exams, installing sockets, implying that students were "improvised" during the exams, usually not teaching hard, and always thinking about critical moments.

Opportunistic, the results are not bad.

So many teachers are not very balanced, just like someone in a race suddenly ran away but was not punished, some people began to follow suit, and the atmosphere slowly deteriorated, and now, adjusting seats before exams, and telling students to "act cheap" seems to have become an unspoken rule, and it seems a bit strange for teachers who do not make any arrangements, and students sometimes remind teachers that it is time to change seats. <>

Conclusion: As a role model for students, such behavior will undoubtedly cause great confusion among students, is the principle important or the result? Why is the teacher's usual morality and practical actions contrary?

To change this situation, we can only change this evaluation mechanism for teachers' teaching performance, so that teachers can face the exam calmly and without too much pressure!

I think the school should criticize the teacher, this kind of behavior is irresponsible, it is a manifestation of deceiving students and parents, and in serious cases, it will be expelled directly.

I think that if you encounter such a situation, you should report it to the local education department in time.

If he really doesn't believe you, you go to his office, and you say, teacher, I really didn't cheat, you said that I cheated to have evidence, did you see that I wrote the formula in the sketchbook before the exam, I said I wrote it during the exam, you have to talk about evidence when you speak as a teacher, you have no evidence, I hope you don't jump to conclusions, you have my reputation in the class and the impact of my psychology as a student, can you be responsible, if you can't take this responsibility, Then I hope you will report this matter to your superiors, or someone in this school who can take this responsibility for me!

I think this shows that this student is usually not particularly good in the teacher's impression. What this student should do now is to study hard and use his constantly improving grades to let the teacher know that he has really worked hard.

The teacher's evaluation has a big subjective problem, and the objective facts of the student cannot be determined because of their own subjective problems.

Violation of the relevant provisions of the Compulsory Education Law:

Article 22 of the Compulsory Education Law: The people** at or above the county level and their administrative departments for education shall promote the balanced development of schools, narrow the gap between schools in terms of operating conditions, and must not divide schools into key and non-key schools. Schools must not divide key classes into non-key classes.

Article 29: Teachers shall treat students equally in education and teaching, pay attention to students' individual differences, teach students in accordance with their aptitude, and promote the full development of students.

If the student did not plagiarize, it proves that the teacher usually does not pay attention to his efforts, if he wants to prove his innocence, take out the usual homework, do the exercises, everything will be clear at a glance.

Tell him: Teacher, you can't make our class grades better. One good and one bad can help each other and help each other.

Let the results be greatly improved. 1. The introduction is close to the teacher, ask questions if you have nothing to do, so that the teacher thinks that you are a good child who loves to learn 2. Tell the teacher that you can't see the blackboard, and hope to move forward two rows, and the students around you always speak in class 3. It's best to let your father tell the teacher.

Is it reasonable for elementary school teachers to let good students and poor students be at the same table? Tiannacai Primary School** has a particularly absolute eugenic and poor student? Elementary school students are the ones who listen to their teachers the most, and if you give out a prize and say, "You have to learn to share," there will be two small pieces (very small, the size of a fingernail) at the same table.

Arrange the same table of good students and poor students, as long as you ask the poor students to learn the learning attitude of good students (you should be as serious as your table!). Please help you discipline the poor students, there are a few really disobedient ...... in the classIn this way, the atmosphere of learning will be much better. After all, a lot of sensible children are watching for you.

Students always have to help each other.

Whether it is reasonable or not cannot be simply said. It takes a lot of conditions to transfer the excellent children to the side of the junior students, so that the excellent children can lead the backward children. First of all, as a teacher, you must be able to maintain the stability of class discipline, and not let the backward children be too loose and affect the excellent children.

Secondly, excellent children must be caring and helpful children. Thirdly, the teacher must pay constant attention to the pair of tablemates, and the backward children must be praised in time for their progress. Excellent children should also listen and help fully if they have any problems, and if the development method is not good, they must make adjustments immediately.

It is absolutely not okay to just leave two children together, and it is impossible to have the desired effect.

When I was in elementary school, there was a student in the class who often fought and was the worst at learning. One day, Xiao A made another mistake, and the teacher first beat and scolded him in the class, and then asked, "Does anyone think that Xiao A still has hope for the future?" , I thought that no one should reply and continue to bombard, but naively, I raised my hand high and said: "I think there is hope for Little A". The teacher said:

Then you can sit at a table with Xiao A", its original intention was good, I was the first in the class at that time, and I could take him with me at a table with Xiao A, but ......

Let the good students and the poor students share the table, there are good places and bad places. If eugenics can drive poor students, it is a good thing to help poor students improve. On the contrary, it is not good for eugenics to be brought bad by poor students.

Reasonable, let them learn from each other, urge each other to improve learning.

I don't think this is very reasonable, because poor students do not necessarily get better with eugenics, but poor students may affect the learning of eugenics. After all, not every eugenic has a strong sense of control.

It makes sense for elementary school teachers to let good and poor students share the same table. The teacher's starting point is also good, and he wants the winner to guide the poor students to learn. Poor students will be less playful and study hard under the influence of eugenics, and their academic performance will naturally improve.

I think it's reasonable, when we were children in school, teachers did the same, in fact, I think that although learning is very important in school, we also need to understand that classmates help each other, and those with good grades and those with poor grades sit together, so you can help this student in learning.

This is absolutely unreasonable. There are reasons why poor students become poor, and their own reasons should account for the main aspect, and it is definitely not that putting an excellent student next to it can make a poor student become excellent. On the contrary, there may be the phenomenon of poor students bullying top students.

It is still more reasonable, because most teachers will want excellent students to drive the learning enthusiasm of poor students, which will also make students feel that everyone is equal, and the teacher does not divide the students into grades.

This makes sense. You can let the top students lead the poor students to study together. So that poor students can learn the attitude of excellent students. Progress with each other.

I think it's very reasonable, because in this way, eugenics can help poor students improve their grades. You can help each other grow together.

This is reasonable, but if the top students are led by the poor students' grades decline, then at this time, they should adjust their seats in time to avoid other impacts, and many people will be affected.

I think it's very reasonable, so that poor students can feel the learning atmosphere.

Primary school students generally have a relatively shallow cognition, and generally have the idea that good students and poor students are instilled by teachers, such as obedient students are good students, and disobedient students are poor students. If the teacher does not have a correct three views, but does not teach naughty students or students with bad grades, but instead lets them go or criticizes him in front of other students, it will definitely cause damage to his young mind!

This is still not a generalization. Some foreign educational institutions do this, but one of the benefits of doing so is that they can better grasp the situation of the students.

For example, if a difficult test paper is examined, and both middle and poor students are given the same score, then it is impossible to distinguish the level of students.

But if the teacher is not thinking about the students with poor grades, but only for the sake of the students with good grades, then it will definitely not, and the teacher can complain about discriminating against the students with poor grades.

It can cause psychological problems for students. This is not right. It needs to be harshly criticized.

No, this is done to prevent plagiarism and to motivate students.

Don't want to be assigned to the Bad Class Exam? Okay, get good grades.