Plagiarism of songs is frequent, and plagiarism is easier to see from the lyrics or tunes?

In fact, through some celebrities and some of the dynamics they posted, we can also see that there are many people in this aspect of singing. They have such a phenomenon of plagiarism, and this phenomenon is also endless, after all, such a situation has always occurred around us. There are some people who always like to steal other people's work and take some of their work for themselves, which is also very disrespectful to others.

It will make him lose a lot of fans, and the fans will listen to them sing with such an attitude that they have a lot of them. But if they don't insist on their own originality to plagiarize other people's works in their own creations, it will also make others question the overall character of her person, thinking that he is a morally corrupt person, so they will make such a move. <>

If he plagiarizes, then it will put him in a very embarrassing situation, and it will also make him lose a lot of heat and heat. Some people ask such a question, for a plagiarized singer, can it be seen from the lyrics or tunes in this song that he plagiarized? We all know that people who have learned ** usually have a certain sensitivity to the tune of the song, because its melody is always different.

If the lyrics are similar, then there is a certain language and literature and his cultural literacy in terms of lyrics. Many people will plagiarize tunes when they plagiarize, and there are really few people who plagiarize lyrics, because the lyrics are something that we can see at a glance when we pay attention to them. <>

And when the listener listens to the song, or even when he doesn't listen to the song, he will find that the lyrics are plagiarism just by letting him look at it. Therefore, the melody of the song is the most important factor. There are some singers who do it for their own convenience or to learn the tunes of some popular songs.

Their purpose is to create more heat for themselves and reach a higher level of traffic. After all, the popularity of a song is a very high concept, so they hope that they can also achieve such an achievement, so they will copy the tunes of other songs. <>

But everyone knows that if the tune is similar by more than four notes, then it is plagiarism, and if there is a chord similarity, it is understandable. Because there is already one in terms of ** this thing. A different feeling, so if you plagiarize in a certain place, it can also be heard by others at once, and they are faced with plagiarism of such a tune, and there are many people who will change the tune when they plagiarize, but all changes are still the same, so we can still judge his plagiarism, and we are also very reluctant to this phenomenon.

Plagiarism is definitely easier to see from the tune, because you can tell it by listening to the melody, and there is no point in plagiarizing the lyrics, as long as the words are different, you can't say that people are plagiarizing.

Plagiarism is easier to see from the lyrics because the tune is difficult to change, whereas changing the lyrics is easy, and from the lyrics it is easy to find out that it is an adaptation, and changing the tune will make it a completely new song, which is also difficult to find.

It can be seen from the tune, because the tune of one song and another song must be different, and if there is similarity, then it must be plagiarism.

How it works:

In the provisions of Chinese law, to define whether a work is plagiarism, "contact + substantial similarity" is generally used to define it.

"Contact" is also divided into two situations, one is that if the first work has been widely disseminated, if there is another song that is similar, then it can be identified as plagiarism; Another situation is that the ** work itself has not been publicly published, but if the ** work has participated in the competition, then the judges and the audience will be deemed to have been in contact with the ** work.

Substantial similarity is relatively easy to understand, that is, a large number of similarities in the melody between ** works, if the similar melodic fragments are determined to be original, then it can be identified as plagiarism.

In addition, substantial similarity should also be judged according to the entire ** work, which can be judged as plagiarism by 8 bar similarities, or that the main chord and genus chord in the ** accompaniment are too similar in proportion, and it can also be judged as plagiarism.

According to industry practice, 8 bars in each song can be considered plagiarism. If the defendant goes to court to file a lawsuit, it is necessary to prepare the master tape or related work evidence created at that time. Typical examples include Stephen Chow's "Domestic Lingling Paint" high-imitation 007 theme song, and the high-imitation "Huanzhu Gege" in "People Are Embarrassed in Thailand".

In fact, neither the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China, the International Copyright Law, the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, nor the laws of any country have any provision that "the same subsections below the subsection is not plagiarism".

Whether a work is plagiarized or not is subject to a judge's determination of whether there is "substantial similarity". There have also been examples of 4 bars similar (not identical) that are convicted of plagiarism. For example, the case of the Korean composer Jin-Young Park.

The standard for judging the plagiarism of ** works is "eight consecutive similarities". But this is just a word of the family, and it is not universally applicable. For example, if you write a song, you have eight bars, and you have copied 4 bars from one song and 4 bars from another song, according to the judgment standard of "eight bars are the same continuously", this does not constitute plagiarism.

What's more, the two songs that everyone usually says "sound the same" and "feel similar" are not necessarily plagiarism. Because there are many reasons why it sounds like or feels like it, it may be the same chord, it may be the same rhythm, and it is difficult for people who have not studied it professionally to distinguish and make wrong judgments.

8 bars is just a tune, unlikely! Many nursery rhymes are only eight bars or less, such as Birthday Song, Happy New Year, Two Tigers, Mary Has a Little Lamb, and so on. In the piano initiation book, you can see that many elementary pieces are only four or eight bars!

It is nonsense to say that eight or ten sections are the same as plagiarism, and the brick family must be asked to identify after the case is filed.

If there is a paragraph that is the same or very inconsistent, it is plagiarism. There are regulations.

The main theme is mostly consistent with the original work and is considered plagiarism.