Is it reasonable to leak rain on the top floor and re do the waterproofing to let all residents shar

<> this makes sense and must be shared among all users, as the rooftop balcony is a common area.

Many people subconsciously think that the roof leakage of the house is the responsibility of the top floor, because the roof leakage can not affect themselves, so it is not their own high-hanging, so they refuse to share the money, theoretically it seems to be right, but we must realize that the current roof of the commercial house is generally shared by everyone, such as drying quilts, sunning moldy things, etc.

In reality, as long as the residents on the top floor do not lock the road to the roof, and each resident can go up to the roof, then everyone should share it equally, of course, because the people on the top floor may be more commonly used to the roof (for example, you can put some foam boxes on the top floor to raise some flowers or vegetables, or drink and eat barbecue on the roof in summer, etc.), but this is not necessarily, and there is no need to say that the top floor must be shared, not to mention that the top floor residents are still direct victims.

Of course, the household's own share is the worst choice, in reality there is a better solution, that is, maintenance, now when the commercial housing is delivered, everyone will pay a fund, called public maintenance, and the amount is not small, basically one or two thousand, a 1,000 households is one or two million, every year alone in the bank can generate hundreds of thousands of yuan of interest, so you can apply for public maintenance maintenance.

In addition, there is also a part of the income can also be used for maintenance, that is, the public income of the community, such as the billboards in the elevator room, etc., this part of the income belongs to all the owners, but in reality, most of this part of the income has been embezzled by the property, especially the community that has not established the property committee, if there is an industry committee, this part of the funds may be part of the property committee, you can find the property committee to repair.

In short, the tenant pool is the last option (for example, if the water leaks within a certain number of years, you can also find the developer to repair it, and according to the provisions of the Building Law, the developer must also be responsible for repairing). Of course, if you come to this point, I hope that everyone understands each other, after all, the waterproof public stall on the top of a building is only a few hundred yuan, and there is no need to make trouble for this in the future, after all, they are all neighbors.

I think this kind of discussion should be discussed on a case-by-case basis, if there is property management, the property should pay for it, and if it is an old community, the residents should be allowed to share the money, but the top floor residents should be considered the majority.

I don't think it's reasonable, because each owner checks all kinds of problems when they receive the house, and they will only accept the house if there are no problems. If you have any problems after taking over the house, you are repairing it yourself.

Unreasonable, this is a problem of housing quality, it should be the developer or the property is responsible, and it has nothing to do with the residents, so the residents do not have to take the money.

Irrationality. This should be done before the developer sells the house, and it is the responsibility of the developer and the property, not the resident.

Neighbors should help each other, and the top floor needs to be re-waterproofed because of rain leakage, and all residents need to share the money, which is reasonable. Because the roof is shared by everyone, it is a public area.

Some people say that when buying a house, you must not buy the top floor, because the top floor is cold in winter and hot in summer, and one of the biggest problems is rain leakage. Because of the heavy rain in summer, the top floor leaks, and the roof needs to be re-waterproofed, but this money is too much, and the top floor can't afford it, so all residents can share the money, because the roof is shared by everyone. The roof is a common area, some people put a water heater on the roof, and some people dry things on it, so the roof is a place that everyone owns, and the roof leaks, and the cost of this repair should be shared by all residents.

When we buy a house, we will pay a maintenance **, which is used for house maintenance. Although it is reasonable to let all households share the money, it is difficult to implement it in reality, in this case, you can consider using maintenance**, apply to the relevant departments for maintenance**, public maintenance**.

It needs to be approved layer by layer, and you can type the application report first. The roof leaks, it is very troublesome to encounter this kind of thing, the residents on the top floor are miserable, which will affect the lives of the residents, and the residents on the top floor should actively find the relevant departments to solve it.

There is property management in the community, there are property companies settled in the community, and you will see advertisements posted in the community, as well as advertising signs, etc., which will generate income. The property management company cannot let these companies advertise for no reason, and the advertising revenue belongs to all the residents, but the property company took the money, and the residents are now facing the problem of rain leakage, so they can apply to the property management company for public revenue to repair it. The tenant has paid the property management fee to the property management company of the community, and in the event of rain leakage on the roof, the property management company should repair the residents on the top floor.

This is unreasonable, if there are no other neighbors' things on the roof, other residents should not share the money, and let the residents on the top floor negotiate with the property.

I think this approach is unreasonable, the owners of the community are paying the property fee every year, and the property fee is used to repair and maintain the facilities of the community, so the property should take out the property fee paid by the residents to repair the roof.

I think this kind of approach depends on your personal opinion, and if you think it is reasonable, it is also reasonable, because they live on the top floor, and they block a lot of people from it.

Generally, it is reasonable to let all residents share the money, but many low-rise residents are reluctant to do this, because there is no benefit to them, and at this time they can find the property to solve it, because the property will generally have major repairs**, and the residents do not need to pay too much money themselves.

Of course, this is unreasonable, the waterproofing of the top floor is not done well, it is the developer's problem, this needs to contact the property to communicate, let all residents share, this is a completely unreasonable thing.

The roof of the top floor is leaking, and it is necessary to re-do the waterproofing, which I personally think is more reasonable, after all, this building is the whole user, not a home, and I personally think it is reasonable to let all residents share the money.

Irrationality. The roof of the top floor leaks, and it is the responsibility of the community property to re-do the waterproofing, and the community property can be found for negotiation and adjustment, so that the community property can find someone to re-do the waterproofing.

Legal analysis: The roof of the building is a public part, if the waterproof layer is redone, it is necessary for the owners' committee to apply to the Municipal Property Maintenance Management Center for the special maintenance of the property after obtaining the consent of the owner of the building. After the application is approved and the funding is granted, the maintenance of the plant source is entrusted to the negotiate.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 285: [Relationship between Property Owners and Property Management Service Enterprises or Other Managers] On the basis of the entrustment of the property owners, property management service enterprises or other managers shall manage the buildings and their ancillary facilities within the building zoning in accordance with the provisions of Part III of this Law on property management service contracts, accept the supervision of the owners, and promptly respond to the owners' inquiries about the property management services. Property service enterprises or other managers shall implement emergency response measures and other management measures implemented in accordance with the law, and actively cooperate with relevant work.

Article 287: [Protection of the Lawful Rights and Interests of Property Owners] Owners have the right to request that construction units, property management service enterprises, or other managers of pure acceptance offices, as well as other property owners bear civil liability for their infringement of their lawful rights and interests.

Legal analysis: If the roof is waterproofed, it should be paid for the waterproofing of the whole building. Seepping dregs.

Legal basis: Chi Zheng of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 281 The maintenance funds of buildings and their ancillary facilities belong to the owners in common. By the joint decision of the owners, it can be used for the maintenance, renewal and transformation of common parts such as elevators, roofs, exterior walls, barrier-free facilities, etc.

The raising and use of funds for the maintenance of buildings and their ancillary facilities shall be announced on a regular basis. If it is necessary to repair the building and its ancillary facilities in an emergency, the owners' assembly or the owners' committee may apply for the use of the maintenance funds of the building and its ancillary facilities in accordance with the law.