Don t herbivores have a lot of attack power? How did they survive?

Because herbivores do not have much attack power, they have a strong reproductive ability and are also abundant in food, so herbivores rely on racial reproduction to maintain their living space and slowly develop and grow.

Rhinos, elephants, and hippos are all herbivorous, and their attack power is high. If you look at the animal world, you can see that most herbivores are in groups, and they will resist when they encounter natural enemies, and carnivores are looking for a lonely chase.

The attack power is not very large, but they are numerous, and they survive on numbers. If it weren't for the large numbers and the speed, it might be really difficult to survive from those predators. But the rest is really nothing, no special survivability.

For a long time, I thought that herbivores were a vulnerable group, hunted and hunted by predators all day long. It wasn't until I visited the Museum of Natural History that this perception changed.

Whether it is in TV shows or various literary works, lions and tigers are majestic, chasing prey everywhere, cattle, sheep, red deer, etc., only eating grass and running for their lives. I feel that the cattle, sheep and red deer are very pitiful, docile and harmless, but they are always eaten, and I feel very sorry for them.

I have been particularly interested in the animal world since I was a child. One weekend, I suddenly had the interest to visit the Museum of Natural History.

There are many amazing dinosaur fossils and various prehistoric animal fossils, dazzling various butterflies and insects, evolutionary logic, and the rise and fall of various creatures. I feel a lot. The deepest feeling is the re-understanding of herbivores.

I saw all kinds of deer, not only do they have a variety of horns that can make deadly **, but the style of the horns is dazzling.

And the burly body type. I saw a variety of cattle, with more sturdy bodies and thicker and sharper horns. There are also many patterns of horns, but they are all very lethal.

There are also tall camels, giraffes, who have powerful legs. It's also fatal**.

Look at the carnivores, lions, tigers, leopards, the largest lions are more hungry than cattle, deer and horses, not very big, but a little small.

Suddenly it feels like these herbivores, even individually, are not a vulnerable group, not to mention that they often move in groups. If it weren't for their docile personalities, they might have easily killed a few lions and leopards.

In fact, lions, tigers, leopards, these carnivores can't eat as many cows as they want, they can only hunt two rotten Huaijian in the herd, the old, weak, sick and disabled. This is the balance of herbivores versus carnivores.

If the carnivore is too strong, the herbivore will be eaten up, extinct, and then the carnivore will become extinct because there is no food. So they will reach an even equilibrium.

Herbivores can maintain a certain size, sacrifice some of the old, weak, sick and disabled, and maintain stable survival and reproduction. Carnivores rely on hunting herbivores to keep their race slow and stable.

At this point, I don't think herbivores are weak, they are on par with carnivores.

Thinking further, the grass of herbivores is everywhere, the problem of eating is easy to solve, and the problem of defending against natural enemies may not be a big problem, because of their own group strategy, their own physical strength and body shape have the advantage of clear defeat, ** have an advantage. As long as they are not the weakest in the group, survival may be leisurely for them.

For carnivores, the problem of natural predators is carefree, but the problem of eating is a worry of every meal, and every meal is a fight, and it may be life-threatening every time, risking being cut by the horns of a buffalo and being kicked in the head by a giraffe.

So, animals evolve into herbivores and carnivores, both of which are good strategies. There is no such thing as a weak or a strong one.

It is advisable to look at the problem in depth.

Because carnivores eat a lot of meat, the fat content in the body will increase, making its nervous system more developed, and the excitability of the carnivore nervous system is lower, so the carnivore nervous system is more excited, and its endurance will be smaller, while the excitability of the herbivore nervous system is lower, making its endurance enhanced.

Because the endurance of herbivores is relatively strong, while the explosiveness of carnivores is relatively strong, and the endurance is somewhat insufficient, the endurance of carnivores is generally not comparable to that of herbivores.

Carnivores and herbivores have evolved over a long period of time, and the skeletal and muscular structures of the bodies are completely different. So herbivores have stronger endurance than carnivores.

This world is a world where man and nature live in harmony, and there are many animals growing in the mysterious savannahs of Africa. As we all know, animals are also herbivorous and carnivorous. The mysterious African savannah is home to many herbivores, such as zebras, giraffes, deer and antelopes.

By watching the documentary, we can clearly find that some small herbivores give up resistance as soon as they are obtained, why is this? Why would they be willing to give up on the fish? Don't they have some desire to survive?

Or is there something else going on here, it's dragging time to make the same kind run faster? What's going on? I will answer this question for you today.

By watching the documentary, we can clearly find that small animals give up resistance after being caught, why is this? Is it really coercion? Those carnivores have such great authority that the animals have forgotten even the instinct to survive.

In fact, this is not the case, any animal has an instinct to survive, and herbivores also want to resist, but carnivores know which parts of their prey are deadly. Large animals like lions and tigers know very well that one move is fatal, and only one move can make the prey unconscious and lose the ability to resist, which is why herbivores give up resistance as soon as they are killed.

There is another more touching reason that after the predator captures the ** eater, he knows that he is powerless to resist, and it is useless to resist more. So give up resistance, sacrifice yourself, and complete the group, as long as the predator finds food to fill an empty stomach, it will not pursue other prey.

After watching the documentary, we found that some herbivores** gave up their resistance not because they didn't want to survive. But herbivores are not as good as carnivores, and herbivores are in a state of exhaustion and are not good at running for long periods of time, so they will have no strength after running. **The eater has no strength to resist after catching up.

Larger herbivores such as hippos can also rely on their own injury resistance to kill, which is the advantage of size. But sheep and deer were not so lucky, which is why they gave up their resistance.

In nature, animals can be divided into herbivores and carnivores. But there is a saying in nature that carnivores are smarter than herbivores. In fact, this statement can only be applied to some herbivores and carnivores in nature.

1. Comparison of the IQ of carnivores and herbivoresRegarding the comparison of the IQ of carnivores and herbivores, we cannot make a one-size-fits-all statement. However, if carnivores and herbivores are in the same hierarchy of the animal kingdom, herbivores may have lower IQs than food-eating animals. Of course, this IQ comparison also involves brain capacity between carnivores and herbivores.

For example, snakes, which are carnivores, have a very low IQ and a very small brain capacity. But snakes are not as intelligent as elephants among herbivores. It can be seen that when comparing the IQ of herbivores and carnivores, we need to consider many factors, so we need to analyze and make judgments according to the specific situation.

2. Introduction to herbivores and carnivoresThe number of herbivores in nature is far greater than the number of carnivores. Yes, herbivores account for more than 90 percent of the total animal kingdom in nature, while carnivores account for only 10 percent.

3. In summary, before we compare the IQ of herbivores and carnivores, we can first understand the relevant knowledge of herbivores and carnivores. Now that we know about herbivores and food-eating animals, we can compare the IQ of herbivores and carnivores according to the actual situation.

Because herbivores are born to eat green food, carnivores are different and live on meat. Therefore, herbivores choose to flee because they will not eat the carcasses of carnivores even if they succeed in battle.

Because carnivores are very ferocious, even if herbivores have the ability to resist, they will be greatly harmed, so they will choose to flee.

Mainly because carnivores mostly live in herds, it is difficult to escape with a herd.

Carnivores have a higher IQ than herbivores.

Herbivorous properties can be broadly divided into the following:

1.Leaf-eating leafminers feed on leaf tissues Strange hoofs Artiodactyls other than pigs Elephants Gorillas Pandas Some rodents such as guinea pigs, fierce pigs, beavers, capybaras, etc. Rabbits Tortoises Grasshoppers Butterfly moths Hungry larvae Snails Slugs.

2.Fruit-eating Squirrels Some primates Flying foxes Some birds, such as parrots, hornbills, and owls Some agricultural pests, such as coconut crabs such as if flies.

3.Grain-eating weevils, bean weevils.

4.Honey-eating Aphids feed on plant sap Honeybee butterfly moths Hummingbirds Some beetles, such as unicorns, stag beetles, longhorn beetles, etc. (branches).

5.Branch-eating leggy evokive leaf-cutting ants.