Do you think the verdict in the case of 100,000 Bad Jokes Infringing on Hulu Brothers is reasonable?

Updated on amusement 2024-07-05
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    I believe that friends who like anime have watched "100,000 Bad Jokes", as a rare high-quality animation in Chinese comics, the popularity is still rising, and the point score is also very high, and it is also one of the few works recognized by anime fans. Because there is an image of a gourd baby in the anime, the 100,000 bad jokes anime was sued by the Shanghai Fine Arts Film Studio, I think it isReasonable

    I remember that the domestic animation "100,000 Bad Jokes" was extremely popular in the first few years of its release, but as an anime plot, it seems a bit illogical. At that time, "100,000 Bad Jokes" was not a high-quality work, but it can be called an excellent work in terms of innovation and content, and I looked forward to updates every day when I was in junior high school, and I was more curious about the future plot. Every day, I have to discuss this anime with my classmates or friends.

    This is also one of the anime I must follow. It is also a corner of my youth that I cannot forget. And now more and more excellent anime are on the market, which has also caused this anime to slowly fade out of the public eye, but as a fan, I still continue to pay attention.

    Recently, a news broke out that Shanghai Fine Arts Film Studio sued "100,000 Bad Jokes" for infringement. Infringing on the animation image adaptation and dissemination rights of its gourd baby, big baby, second baby, third baby, fourth baby, fifth baby, and seventh baby. And the lawsuit was successful, and the verdict was that the anime stopped using the Huluwa image anime characters.

    and imposed a fine of 500,000 yuan for economic damages. Although I also like "100,000 Bad Jokes", from the perspective of Shanghai Fine Arts Film Studio, I think that since the anime is infringing, it should be punished.

    Summary: I think that no matter what it is, whether it is an anime or an adaptation, it is necessary to respect the original work as such an excellent work. We should negotiate copyright issues with the original company as early as possible, and when more and more anime in modern times steal original characters from other companies, we should pay attention to bringing joy to everyone, and at the same time, we should not forget to respect the original.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I think it's reasonable, because it's illegal for you to use someone else's work without the person in question, and everyone has the right to protect it.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Plausible. 100,000 cold jokes use the characters and general plot of the Hulu Brothers, and distort the meaning and image of the Hulu Brothers themselves. And there is no copyright fee given to the Hulu brothers.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I think it's reasonable, such a punishment can give a wake-up call to 100,000 bad jokes, and it is also a protection of intellectual property rights.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    <>Recently, 100,000 cold jokes are suspected of infringing on the Hulu brothers. The six Froova art works in the game involved in the 100,000 Han Noisy Joke are similar to the characters of the six Hulu Doll art works in the "Hulu Brothers" cartoonconstitutes copyright infringement.

    The court of first instance ruled that April Star Company, Xianshan Company, Miaoqu Company, and Langang Company should immediately stop infringing on the copyright of the "Hulu Baby" animation art work of Meiying Studio; Publish a statement and eliminate the impact; In April, Star Company, Xianshan Company, Miaoqu Company, and Langang Company jointly and severally compensated Meiying Studio for economic losses of 500,000 yuan and reasonable expenses of 19,500 yuan.

    Subsequently, although the four companies were not satisfied with the first-instance judgment, they appealed to the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court. After the trial, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court held that April Star Company had infringed the right to adapt the work of the studio. In April, Star Company and Xianshan Company successively provided animation image authorization for the games involved in the case, Miaoqu Company developed the games involved in the case, and Langang Company operated the games involved in the case, jointly infringing on the right of information network dissemination of the works of the United States Film Studio.

    Taking into account the time and scope of the infringement, it was determined that 100,000 cold jokes should compensate the Hulu Brothers for economic losses of 500,000 yuan, and the amount of compensation determined was maintained within a reasonable range. The appellants shall be jointly and severally liable for compensation if they cooperate in the division of labor and jointly commit the infringing acts. The Shanghai Intellectual Property Court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment.

    Copyright infringement refers to all acts that infringe on the moral rights and property rights enjoyed by the copyright owner in violation of the Copyright Law. Specifically, if the perpetrator commits the acts specified in Articles 47 and 48 of the Copyright Law, and infringes the copyright of others and causes property or non-property losses, it is an infringement of Iwaga's copyright.

    The fact of infringement means that the perpetrator uses the copyright owner's work without the permission of the copyright owner and in accordance with the conditions of use stipulated in the Copyright Law, as well as performancesAudio-visual productsand radio and television programs. Copyright infringement, without the consent of the author and other copyright holders, nor does it belong to the situation of fair use and statutory use, which is an unauthorized use of the work, and thereforeA violation of copyright law。Such infringement may not only cause damage to the moral rights of others, but may also cause damage to the property rights of others, and may also damage the moral rights and property rights of others.

    For example, illegal copying of other people's works may only infringe on the property rights of others, while counterfeiting of others' works often infringes on the moral rights and property rights of others at the same time.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Penalty. The court ordered 100,000 Bad Joke Company to compensate Shanghai Fine Arts Film Production Company 500,000 yuan for economic expenses.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Recently, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court pronounced a judgment on the second-instance judgment of the copyright dispute between "100,000 Bad Jokes" and "Hulu Brothers", upholding the original judgment of the first instance, and finding that the images of the six Frilva in "100,000 Bad Jokes" are substantially similar to the six gourd babies in "Hulu Brothers", which constitutes copyright infringement, and that "100,000 Bad Jokes" should immediately stop infringing on the copyright of the Huluwa animation art works of the United States Film Studio, and jointly and severally compensate the American Film Studio for economic losses of 500,000 yuan and reasonable expenses of 19,500 yuan.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The court made a judgment in the second instance, and the court ruled that the six Fluffies in "100,000 Bad Jokes" infringed the copyright of "Hulu Brothers", and finally the infringing parties April Star Company and Xianshan and other companies made 500,000 yuan in infringement compensation to Meiying Company.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The court ordered 100,000 bad jokes to immediately stop the infringement, and published an explanation of the actual situation, so as to eliminate the adverse effects caused by the incident as soon as possible, and also to pay the relevant damages caused by the infringement.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    100,000 bad jokes infringe on Hulu Brothers, constituting copyright infringement. The court's judgment was to stop the infringement against Hulu Brothers, and to impose economic losses of 500,000 yuan and reasonable expenses of 19,500 yuan.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The court awarded 50,000 yuan in damages. Because the court held that the infringing was only similar to the clothes in the gourd brothers, and nothing else. The circumstances are relatively minor, so the amount of the penalty is relatively small.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The Shanghai Intellectual Property Court upheld the original judgment of the first instance, requiring 100,000 bad jokes to immediately stop the infringement of Huihuwa's copyright and compensate Shanghai Fine Arts Film Studio 500,000 yuan.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Of course, what ushered in is compensation and takedown. The cartoon "Hulu Brothers" was infringed by the comics, animations and game works of "100,000 Bad Jokes", and the producer was compensated 500,000 yuan.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Film and television infringement can be resolved through legal means, which is the safest way to do fairness.

Related questions
14 answers2024-07-05

What is a gourd baby cold joke??

1、Yesterday I received a greeting on QQ.,Open it and see.,It's a handsome guy The conversation is as follows。 >>>More

6 answers2024-07-05

9 and 10 both rose on May 31, and now there are only 8 and 1 side stories, which are the official Weibo of 100,000 bad jokes.

10 answers2024-07-05

Time Chicken calls the protagonist "Young man!" ”

6 answers2024-07-05

Very simple things are said to be so complicated, three monomers, one with blood and one shield. Summoning a friend. More than 70,000 attacks. >>>More

20 answers2024-07-05

Hit the computer to see the color please**.