Is Germany still under the condominium of Britain, France and the United States, an example of Brita

No, Germany has long been independent, an independent country.

France wants to become the first country in continental Europe, in fact, Britain is a balance of countries on the European continent, checking and balancing each other, and does not want to weaken Germany too much, and the United States has no meaning

According to the Potsdam Proclamation, the punishment of the defeated country.

In fact, it was France that really desperately tried to clean up Germany after World War I. Britain is more detached. The United States, on the other hand, tends to support Germany and does not want to weaken Germany too much.

After the war, the largest investment in the Weimar Republic was American capital. Later, in order to deal with the German reparation issue, the "Young Plan" and the "Dawes Plan" were also carried out by the US financial circles.

Britain has historically pursued the policy of "balance of power in Europe", the main purpose of which is to never allow a certain power to dominate the European continent, so when Napoleon's France rose, Britain cobbled together an anti-French alliance to beat France; Tsarist Russia sat on the throne and acted as the "gendarme of Europe", and Britain united with France to launch the Crimean War, beating Tsarist Russia from its peak; Wilhelm II's German Empire wanted to dominate, and Britain united with France and Russia to form an Entente. After the First World War, Germany collapsed, France sat big again, known as the first army power in Europe, and formed alliances everywhere in Europe, and its power permeated the whole of Europe for a while. At this time, Britain did not approve of France's policy of constantly squeezing Germany, and even stumbled France behind its back.

And the United States thinks the same way as the United Kingdom.

Therefore, it is France, Germany's "thousand-year-old feud", that really wants to suppress Germany, and even wants Germany to never turn over. Almost all of the harshest terms of the Treaty of Versailles were put forward by France, which divided German territory, supported the restoration of Poland and the establishment of the Czech Republic against Germany, and occupied the Ruhr with Belgium, and demanded the demilitarization of the Rhineland.

So to speak.

Although shortly after World War II, the Soviet Union fostered East Germany.

But the Soviet army cluster in Germany was actually the main force for maintaining the pro-Soviet Union in East Germany, and the Soviet army cluster in Germany was actually the emperor of Germany.

Several Soviet defense ministers have said that the so-called East Germany is nothing more than a Soviet military station, and in 1992, the withdrawal of troops from East Germany completely indicated that Soviet forces were launched from East Germany.

Subject: There is a problem with your thinking, Germany was internationally administered after the defeat of fascism, and there are no American, British, and French armies in West Germany? Could it be that if we had retained the right to station troops in Japan like the US military, we would have invaded Japan?

Lou Pig, do you have a problem with your brain? Was it wrong for fascist Germany to invade other countries first, and the Soviet Union to push back the fascists and garrison them as the victors after eliminating them?

The extremes of things must be opposed, so as not to provoke the hatred of German nationalism.

Do you say that the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France gave up Germany to give up the land that occupied Germany after World War II?

What is your impression of the German army in World War II? Many people will say that the science and technology are developed, the army is elite and well-equipped, the army is all tanks and motorized infantry, and the air force is also very strong, only the navy is slightly inferior. In fact, the German army in World War II was really not what we thought.

After the defeat of World War I, Germany was ceded land, reparations, and its military strength was severely limited, and after Hitler came to power, it secretly developed the military industry, and in just a few years, there were no resources and no technology, and it certainly could not be compared with Britain and France. At that time, the German mechanized troops were actually very few, most of the troops were responsible for logistics and transportation by horses and mules, a German infantry division had about 10,000 people and 5,000 mules and horses, and the strength of the Anglo-French army was far greater than that of the German army. Before the conquest of France, the French and British armoured forces had 3,500 tanks, while the German Army had only 2,570 tanks, and almost a third of them were Czech-made.

The German No. 1 and No. 2 tanks combined with nearly 1,500 vehicles, accounting for more than half. Tanks No. 1 and No. 2 were armored with 13 mm and millimeters, No. 1 had two machine guns, No. 2 20 mm cannons, and tanks No. 3 and No. 4 were about 630 units, slightly more than the Soma tanks equipped by the French army. The 30 mm armor of tanks No. 3 and No. 4 was also not very protective against them, and tank No. 3 had a 37 mm short-barreled gun, and Tank No. 4 had a 75-mm short-barreled gun.

At that time, the armor thickness of the French Soma tank was 20 mm, and the armor of the Charles B1 tank was 60 mm thick, and the German tanks were basically unable to fight against it. The main British tank, Matilda 2, had an armor thickness of 80 mm, which was a nightmare for the Germans, who had no tanks or anti-tank guns to deal with. But German tanks were smaller, marched faster, and had better sights.

The turrets of Tanks 3 and 4 were designed to allow the gunner to focus entirely on command, while the commander of the Allied tank had to act as aiming. All German tanks were equipped with radio communication equipment, while British and French officers often commanded with hand gestures. Only the Air Force Germans outnumbered the Allies by almost a thousand.

Later, Germany seized a large amount of armaments from Czechoslovakia and Poland, and in terms of the number of aircraft, tanks, and artillery, it was still superior to the British and French forces. In the subsequent Soviet-German war, the Soviet Union also had advantages in all aspects, and the Soviet KV tank and T34 tank had a huge advantage over the German No. 2 and No. 3 tanks. The reason why the German army was stronger than the British army and the French army was actually a victory in the concept of combat.

Yes. At least for most of the time before the start of World War II, Germany's ** was the most advanced, but it was only after the United States entered the war that Germany's national strength showed a situation of inadequacy, and it gradually fell behind.

The policy of appeasement is a policy adopted by Western countries in order to safeguard their own interests by sacrificing the interests of other countries in exchange for compromises with their opponents.

The appeasement policy pursued by Britain and France before the full-scale outbreak of World War II connived at the aggressive expansion of the German and Italian fascists, and also caused heavy losses to the two countries themselves. The reasons for the appeasement policy pursued by Britain and France were as follows:

First of all, the strategy adopted by Britain and France to maintain their hegemony in the face of their declining power. Britain suffered heavy losses in the First World War, and the post-war economic recovery was very slow. In the twenties and thirties, successive British countries focused their energies on solving economic problems, regarded rearmament as an obstacle to economic recovery, and attempted to achieve the goal of maintaining its hegemony with a foreign policy that was not backed by strength.

Due to its proximity to Germany, France maintained its armaments and pursued a hardline policy towards Germany after World War I. But France's economy has been in recession. Development was limited during the period of relative stability, and the economic crisis in the 30s lasted for a particularly long time, and the economic situation was very grim.

At the same time, the political situation in France is also unstable, and the frequent cabinet changes make it difficult to maintain firmness and continuity in foreign policy. In short, the decline of Britain and France was the material basis for their policy of appeasement.

Second, the implementation of the appeasement policy was closely related to the background of the era in which the two social systems coexisted. After the October Revolution, the confrontation and struggle between the two social systems, capitalism and socialism, began in international relations. Britain, France and other Western countries, in order to prevent the influence of the Soviet Union, used Germany as a bulwark against Bolshevism.

When Germany established a fascist regime and then tore up the Treaty of Versailles to expand abroad, Britain and France tried their best to channel this scourge to the East.

Third, the implementation of the appeasement policy also had a great deal to do with the prevailing trend of social thought in the West at that time. The brutal scenes of the First World War left a painful memory on Europe and the United States, so the post-war pacifist ideology and war-weariness and fear of war were quite prevalent, especially in France. The rulers of Britain and France were both influenced and constrained by pacifism and were the promoters of this trend of thought, and the policy of appeasement was only a product of their implementation of this trend of thought.

With the connivance of the appeasement policies of Britain, France, and the United States, Germany, Italy, and Japan stepped up their aggression and expansion with foreign countries, and this caused the contradictions between the imperialist countries to grow rapidly.

The Munich Treaty sacrificed the Sudetenland, connived at Hitler's invasion of Poland, Mussolini's invasion of Serbia, Franco's provocation of the Spanish Civil War, and Japan's invasion of China.

Without the policy of appeasement, there would have been no September 18 Incident, no Poland's destruction, no later Dunkirk retreat, and no later Soviet Union tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians, this is the essence!! In my opinion, Britain, France, and the United States, which pursued the policy of appeasement, seemed to have contributed to World War II, but in fact, if it were not for them, World War II would have been less tragic, France surrendered, the British fled in disarray, and its filial piety was actually worse than Hitler, they "handed over" millions of German troops to Stalin, Japan launched a full-scale war of aggression against China after the September 18 Incident, and then the United States and Britain saw that the Soviet Union was about to win, so they came to a seemingly "vigorous" Normandy landing, which simply made me laugh!! This is the !!

As everyone knows, four years ago, when the German army broke into France, the British created a great rout unprecedented in history!! Pickpocket!! People only remember Normandy, which is nothing remarkable, compared to Moscow, Leningrad, Stalingrad and all the Soviet and Chinese people who died as little children.

China's Shandong issue was one of the five major topics on the agenda at the Paris Peace Conference, at which China, as the victorious power, demanded the recovery of all Germany's illegal rights and interests in Shandong, while Japan relied on the Sino-Japanese agreement as an excuse. The United States demanded that all German rights in Shandong be transferred to Japan, and the United States advocated that Germany's rights and interests in Shandong should be jointly managed by the international community first, and then handed over to China after Shandong was completely opened up.

Britain, France, and Italy have always supported Japan's unreasonable demands. Because Britain and France are intended to belong to the first group of countries that enjoy overall interests in the conference, and of course the United States and Japan. These five countries can participate in any of the meetings of the Conference.

Naturally, it will help Japan get the benefits he wants. Ignoring China's legitimate demands, the Chinese delegation refused to sign the contract.

At that time, China and Japan agreed to Japan's conditions, that is, they agreed to Japan's privileges in Shandong, because Japan was a strong country and China was a weak country. You can watch the movie "My 1919", thank you.

This is because Britain, the United States and other countries are practicing a "policy of appeasement" and want to win over Japan to deal with the German fascists, so they compromise with Japan!

Britain was pursuing a policy of appeasement, and the United States did not enter the war at that time, but acted as an arms dealer behind the scenes.

After the outbreak of war, Japan declared war on Germany. In fact, it was only to attack Qingdao, a German leased territory in Shandong, and then obtain German rights and interests in Shandong. And did not send troops to fight in Europe.

At the Paris Peace Conference, Britain and France were the dominant players, and Japan was basically non-involved in European affairs. Therefore, Britain and France supported Japan in transferring German interests in Shandong to Japan.

But China was also one of the victorious powers. By refusing to sign the peace treaty, China does not recognize this fact. In 1922, the Nine-Power Conference was held in Washington, D.C., and the Nine-Power Pact was signed.

It was decided to return Shandong's rights and interests to China. This fact has long been overlooked.

I'm glad to answer your questions and wish you progress in your studies! The [the1900] team will answer the questions for you.