Why did the United States, Britain, and France attack Libya Is it the reappearance of the eight nati

On March 19, 2011, France, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Canada, Denmark, Qatar, and others formed an eight-nation coalition. ）

Attack on Libya in North Africa.

Compared with the Eight-Nation Alliance, Libya has little to fight back.

For a long time, we often heard the term "international community" on the radio, as if the "international community" would oppose it as soon as imperialism made a move. Who knows that the number of countries in the world is really limited, only more than 200, most of which are vassals of the United States and Europe, and the so-called "international community" actually has not much content. For example, when we locals say "I", they usually don't say "I" but always say "we".

Comparison: In 1900, the alliance of Britain, France, Germany, Russia, the United States, Japan, Italy, and Austria attacked China. China was defeated in the war, and after the war, it was forced to sign the "Xinchou Treaty", which humiliated the country.

The compensation will be 100 million taels**, which will be repaid in 39 years, with a total of about 1 billion taels of principal and interest. At that time, the fiscal revenue of the Qing Dynasty was only about 20 million taels per year.

Without the Eight-Nation Alliance, you would probably have to wear braids now.

This is the same as when the United States fought Iraq, the United States fought Libya in order to increase the value of the dollar; In this way, more countries will buy their treasury bonds, and in this way, the exchange of products for dollars will form a clear countermeasure; The dollar has become the basis for the United States to become a superpower in exchange for wealth and material, so that the economic crisis can be resolved, the domestic military industry is prosperous, people create workers, solve the problem of domestic unemployment, and pass on the domestic financial crisis.

Upstairs is 2b, and the identification is complete.

The United States, Britain, France, and other countries are waging war against Libya, please introduce the details in detail, such as historical reasons or what they have to do with their interests--- for oil.

The only interest is oil, and if nothing else, Gaddafi is a delirious disease, and he is against everything (including China). I'm not afraid of anything. Such people deserve to die.

Britain and France are old colonies in Africa, and overthrowing Gaddafi is conducive to strengthening its interests in Africa, and as for the United States, Gaddafi has always been a thorn in its side

It should be said that Anglo-American law instructed the United Nations to pass a resolution that allowed them to justifi's attack on Gaddafi.

In fact, no matter how Gaddafi reacts, Britain, the United States and France will find an excuse to send military force to carry out the strike.

For a long time, Gaddafi has always played against Western countries led by the United States, and now the domestic situation has changed dramatically, which is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for Western countries that have always hated him, and it is not even ruled out that the turmoil in Libya is fanned by Western countries behind the scenes.

I suddenly remembered Saddam, but the vanguard of this military attack became France, which is really intriguing, why is Sarkozy so active? Deflect the pressure of the domestic public to disagree with his governance through the military attack on Libya, or accumulate popularity for the next ** election, or use it to restore France's status as a European power? Maybe it's a bit of both.

In the early morning of March 20, the United Kingdom, France, the United States and other countries began air strikes on Libya. Just the day before, Libyan Muammar Gaddafi expressed his acceptance of the UN resolution on the establishment of a no-fly zone over Libya and agreed to a ceasefire, but today the situation suddenly reversed, and the situation in Libya fell into an even more complicated situation. It was said that there was hope for a ceasefire and peace, but now it seems difficult.

Britain, France, the United States and other countries launched air strikes on the Libyan ** army, saying that Gaddafi went back on his word, did not abide by the UN resolutions, and attacked the Benghazi area after the ceasefire was announced. With this excuse, Britain, France, the United States, etc., have a reason to intervene head-on in the situation in Libya. This seems to be a just and peaceful act of humanity.

Who knows, in order to drive away a wolf, a group of more vicious tigers and beasts were attracted. Infringing on innocent people with the same cruel and domineering means, how can this be justified. Behind the wolves is a pack of tigers and beasts, and the Libyan people will fall into an abyss of even greater helplessness, suffering, and disaster.

The United Nations is the black shop run by their people!!

1. Libya is rich in oil.

2. Imperialism will inevitably expand externally.

3. France and Britain relive the old colonial dream.

4. Gaddafi was anti-imperialist.

5. The United States thinks it is the world's policeman.

To put it simply, in order to snatch the purchase priority and price control of oil. Helping the reactionary armed forces overthrow the old ** not only conforms to the local public opinion, but also gains fame, and you can also ask for compensation from the new **. The reward is oil reserves.

Basically, it's a matter of who's going to hit whom. No one helped Lao Ka out, so he couldn't cause any big trouble.

MD has been plundering the resources of other countries under the banner of this righteous division all these years, and what it sounds good is actually all for the best of the eternal life of its own people. It's a bit of a Nazi.

**It's time for a change.**, and in order to win**, France's Sarkozy showed his tough stance. The United States has always considered itself the big brother of the world, and European countries have participated in such things, can it not participate?

Pretending to be like bullying a child.

1 The Secretary-General of the United Nations (Captain of the Earth) has less authority than the Chief of Black Africa、-- the United Nations body responsible for world security, called the Security Council. The five permanent members of the Council have the right of veto. Any military and security affairs must be promoted by the Security Council, and the UN Secretary-General has no right to intervene.

And if the five permanent members of the Security Council are pitted against each other (such as the chemical weapons incident in Syria), the United Nations, an international body, will not be able to let out its farts.

So, the United States and Great Britain and France simply bypassed the UN and took matters into their own hands.

2 The attack on Syria by the United States, Britain and France was launched in the name of the Syrian army's use of chemicals in violation of the Geneva Conventions. Although the details are debatable, they do occupy the moral high ground and also have legal legitimacy.

It's humanitarianism that I applied for, and I said it was an opposition.