Experts are not professional , why do today s audiences be disgusted when they hear experts ?

Because some so-called experts, in fact, do not have a little practical operation, are some literal theories, and when it is necessary to really need to use, the advice given to others is unrealistic, and some so-called experts are actually fake, and the documents are fake. It is precisely because of these reasons that many viewers are very disgusted when they hear experts, because they originally thought that they were professional, and their suggestions were more referential, but in the end, they did not help themselves a little, but made their situation worse, so many people slowly found that the so-called experts are actually not so powerful, and some have no practical experience at all, and they used to rely on theoretical knowledge to obtain certificates. <>

In real life, especially in health programs, many aunts and uncles like to watch the lectures of some experts, and feel that their words are all in place, and all kinds of suggestions feel very good and are of great help to themselves, but they ignore an important point, that is, these so-called experts do not necessarily have practical experience, and may only have theoretical ability in time, but have no practical ability. <>

In fact, some so-called experts only have theoretical ability, but no practical ability. For example, I am a trader, in fact, before learning to trade, I always watched some experts' lectures, and I feel that they are all right in their analysis, but in fact, many of them do not trade by themselves. Later, I found out that most of these so-called experts are lecturing in the way of review, which has appeared, in fact, as long as you have learned a little technical theoretical knowledge, you can speak, but your actual operation is not necessarily like that.

It is precisely because of this that the audience is now very distrustful of some so-called experts, and they are all more disgusted.

Because these experts are open-mouthed, academically unprofessional, and their views on some issues are completely ambiguous, and many rumors are from the mouths of experts, so after several times, the people no longer trust them, and even think that they can only move bricks.

Because the previous experts often put forward some wrong opinions, after it was revealed that these opinions were wrong, everyone felt that the experts were not professional at all. The reason for this is that in the 2010s, some industries were chaotic and some ordinary people were able to pretend to be professionals as experts.

Compared with everyone's blind belief in experts in the past, now everyone has a skeptical attitude towards the words of experts, especially in the society, many people in the name of so-called experts are abducted and deceived, which worsens the word expert, and also makes many people go to extremes, and they scoff at experts when they talk about them. In fact, in the face of experts, we must look at the problem dialectically, and we must not disbelieve or believe their words.

In the face of the expert's point of view, we must find out whether the other party is a real expert or a fake expert, which can actually be judged very well under the development of the Internet today, we can collect more evidence to understand the other party, to see whether the other party really has real talent and learning, or in the name of the expert to seek benefits.

For the views of real experts, we still have to believe in the authority, their views often represent the top views in an industry, basically after a long period of experience and enough scientific analysis to come out, for their views, we should not blindly veto, but according to their own actual situation, combined with the other party's views to judge the problem, we can learn from them to improve.

Secondly, we must not blindly follow the views of experts, the views of experts can often only play an auxiliary role, does not mean that they must be correct, after all, everyone will make mistakes, even if experts are authoritative, they may also stumble, we must do from reality, through their own practice to practice the other party's point of view, rather than what the other party says as the truth, otherwise it is easy to have problems, now many experts are also using the public's psychology, so as to carry out some improper behavior.

We all know that people who have achieved something in a certain field are likely to become experts in this field, and the definition of an expert is to have a high prestige in a certain field and the responsibility and right to speak in leading the way to solve problems. Because experts are generally older people, the elderly, their whole lives have been dedicated to this field, in this field to get the most profound research, experts are a major pillar of our country's development and promote talent education, is indispensable.

For this reason, many schools and **, as well as scientific and technological conferences, lectures, newspapers have a lot of opinions about experts, as well as their research results and some views on the results, whether right or wrong are things worth pondering, sometimes we may also listen to the conference of experts in certain fields, we should look at the problem with a respectful attitude, because experts are after a long time of research to have such results, We should not criticize the views of experts with a skeptical attitude, but we can use our own perspective to see what is different and different between the experts' research results in this field and our own.

Because it is impossible for people who are not saints and sages to be all right, there is no need to dwell on these things, and the most important thing is how to correctly understand and think about this point of view! Instead of constantly dwelling on the experts' wrong opinions, because if they are wrong, they will definitely be discovered later, and they can't hinder their own progress!

We all know that when we hear the word expert, we think that he may become a more high-minded and authoritative person. Many of us may have a lot of respect and admiration for experts. There are experts in all aspects, and experts in a certain field refer to those who have a deeper understanding and insight into this aspect and are better at this aspect.

There are some aspects of the expert's words, ordinary people can not make comparisons, he knows things we don't know, and it is difficult for us to understand what he says, so what he says at this time is very authoritative, and we should listen to their opinions at this time. But I think experts also have different levels, because the review standards for experts are different, some experts may not be very good, but some experts may be very good.

So sometimes experts don't say that they have absolute authority, they can also make mistakes, and we personally have to have our own ability to discriminate. An expert may have his own opinion on a certain aspect, but this realm is not absolute, and he may change as it develops. The opinion of the expert also has his personal subjectivity.

Therefore, I think it is necessary to have your own ideas for the opinions of experts.

First of all, experts Lu Tang is divided into true experts and pseudo-experts.

True experts make mistakes, they belong to the normal early annihilation group, because people are not sages, who can do nothing, Newton, Einstein carbon also made a lot of mistakes.

For the latter, in the Internet era, traffic is money, if a person can attract the attention of everyone (traffic), then he can find a way to monetize, this is called attention economy. In the entertainment industry, this phenomenon is particularly obvious, which is why Chinese celebrities are desperately creating topics to increase their own ** volume.

However, this phenomenon is no exception in other fields and even in the scientific community, where some experts try to attract everyone's attention with surprising opinions, and they are not responsible for the correctness of their own opinions, which is called pseudo-experts. Now there are a lot of such pseudo-experts in China.

I don't think anything is absolutely right, even if it's science, it's right to destroy it for a certain period of time, and it changes with the change of opinion and perception of future generations. So what is an expert, it is nothing more than that he is more good at this cognition, but his views are often mixed with his own emotions in it, if there is a great man who is an expert and he dislikes, then when you ask him how this great man is, he will answer that it is impossible for the scum to evaluate this great man justly, then you need to think about what the expert said about this great man's judgment. If you don't know this great man, then you should learn more about this great man from the side, and don't let the one-sided thoughts of experts sway your thoughts.

To put it bluntly, the opinion of the expert means that you should not only listen to the expert but also understand more about it, and make comparisons and think about it a lot, so that you can form your own views and ideas on this matter.

It should be divided into subject areas.

The natural sciences are not the same as the humanities and social sciences. There are subdivisions within each field, and the specific research directions of the same field are different, and you may hardly understand other aspects.

For the natural sciences, we should naturally trust experts and authorities, and even if there is a mistake, it will soon be corrected by peers, if it is the lack of research in this field itself, then this is only the inevitable limitation of human understanding under certain conditions, and we cannot go beyond history to demand others.

For the humanities and social sciences, you can't fully believe it. On the one hand, it does not belong to the hard science, and in terms of humanities and arts, it can be said that the benevolent and the wise see the wise. On the other hand, it is ideological, limited by the interests and positions of the parties.

Therefore, opinions here are often opposed to each other, and there is a division between the left, the center and the right.