A woman takes her son after divorce, but her son is disobedient, should she take the child to his fa

This doesn't seem to fit. As a mother, you want to be irresponsible because your child is disobedient. Push him to the man to educate and raise.

So why did she fight for the custody of the child in the first place? When you divorce, you can just give custody to your ex-husband. I want to raise it myself.

You have to be responsible. Raising a child is not always easy. The child is still young.

It's inevitable to be mischievous. But it is also malleable. It's okay to educate well.

Put more thought into yourself. Lead by example. Of course, you can also ask your ex-husband to come forward to help educate the children.

After all, he also has the obligation to raise and educate.

After the divorce, it is better for the son to be handed over to his father, because the child listens to his father, and she will be naughty and disobedient whatever the mother says.

The woman took her son after the divorce, but the son was disobedient. Of course, he should be able to bring the child to his father. Because it is also very hard for a woman to take a son after divorce, and generally women's abilities are weaker than that of gay men.

And since. Raising the child by yourself, the child is disobedient. So for the sake of the child's growth, it is better to bring the child back to his father.

Every child has a period of rebellion, and disobedience is a manifestation. If the child wants to follow the father, and the father is very willing to raise the son, then you can give the child to the father. But if one party disagrees, let's keep it as it is, and then have a good talk with my son to understand his true thoughts and feelings.

This should be okay, after all, it is his biological flesh and blood, communicate with him, don't rush to him, ask for his opinion before letting the child go.

You can't give your son to his father because he is disobedient, the child is disobedient, you must educate well, you can't throw off the burden when you encounter something, this is your biological son, you don't care who you call to take care of it.

After the divorce, the most hurt is the child, the child is in the period of rebellion, and will be particularly disobedient, the child will feel that the father does not want him, and the psychological trauma cannot be made up!! If the father is good to the child, you can try to take the child to the father for a period of time, and communicate with the child well, if the father does not like it very much, or is very busy, and has no time to spend with the child, then the child will not change anything even if he goes, or even worse, so it depends on the situation!!

This mainly depends on how it was agreed at that time? If you say that your mother will bring it, you can't bring it to your father because you are disobedient. You can also consult with your father about this. If the father agrees, one is fine.

It is said that divorce does not leave home, not to mention that they are all your children, who is well educated, who should be used, I personally feel that the son is close to the father, and the father speaks more majestic, with this idea, you can communicate with the father well, all for the good of the child, who takes the same.

A woman takes her son after divorce, and if the son is disobedient, it is best not to leave it to the father to take it, which will make the child feel that the mother is going to abandon him. It is recommended that you can find a way with the child's father to see the reason.

The child is not a completely obedient child, this lies in the fact that parents use their own body to educate the child, the child is educated, as long as there is patience and sincerity to make friends with the child, the child will listen to you, should not be saved, so disobedient, give the child to his father, this is not appropriate,

The divorce of parents is a big blow to the child, since he chooses to divorce with the child, he should be responsible for him, and he can't push it to the father because he can't manage it, which will make the child more rebellious.

Hello, this law has ruled that if there is a mother with a child, then you can't give the child to his father again, of course, this can also be negotiated privately, if his father is willing to take this is okay.

If the child's father doesn't mind, you can leave it to him, divorce generally has its own life, you can't do things according to your own will, it's better to negotiate.

After the divorce, the woman took away a few young sons who were disobedient, I think that in this case, I must need to be more patient to teach the children, of course, you can also listen to the opinions of the children, if she is willing to follow the father, it is also okay.

Since the divorced son is brought by you, then take on the responsibility of imitating the mother, and if the son does not listen to the life, you must communicate more with the son, care more about the inner guidance, and cultivate an excellent son is the responsibility of the mother.

You can consider letting his dad take it, because he is disobedient with you, so it's better to let his dad take it

Specifically, you negotiate with your ex-husband, if your ex-husband is willing to take the child with him, then you will give the child to his father.

This child, you are already difficult to discipline. Then give it to his father and let his father take care of it, because if you can't discipline it, it will be equivalent to delaying the child, so it is wise to give it to his father to discipline.

The reason why the child is disobedient must have something to do with the divorce of his parents, and he should sit down with his son and talk calmly, not that it may solve the problem by bringing it to his father.

Whether it's a girl or a boy, it's his nature, he will be naughty and mischievous, and he will be obedient, this is a very normal thing, not necessarily obedient children, many are suppressed. Even if it's not the same for his father, of course, boys must have their fathers with them when they grow up, otherwise they will easily lack masculinity in their personalities and become like girls.

Maybe a little bigger might be better.

This is the original court judgment, or you agreed, if you want the child's father to take it, ask him to discuss it, you can't say that you can't control it, you should take it, both of you are responsible, you can negotiate and deal with it.

It is also normal for children to be disobedient, because they are immature and not sensible enough.

Since the custody of the child is your own, you should be patient.

If you leave the child in the hands of his father, you will be old. I'm afraid the child won't pay attention to you.

The son will have a period of rebellion, at this time we can take him to participate in some voluntary labor, let him know that life is not easy, in this way, he will slowly change himself, we don't rush, we can spend more time with him, do more manual labor and other things.

If a woman takes her son after a divorce, but the son is particularly disobedient, I think it may be better to give the child to his father.

You can try to bring it to his father, after all, it is better to grow up in **, and it is more suitable to live in **.

If the husband and wife divorce, it will definitely hurt the psychology of the child, whether it is the mother. Or dad will have such and such problems.

If you do the laundry after the divorce and you bring your son, you shouldn't push her to your father.

The woman takes her son after the divorce, but the son is disobedient, whether she should give the child to his father to his father, and he may not be obedient. Are you willing to do it?I'll definitely let his dad see, whether the drum is drumming or not, you can control him.

I think it should be based on your own situation.

After the divorce, the question of who the children belong to has also become the focus of contention between the husband and wife. As a October pregnancy.

Many mothers who take the risk of giving birth to a child will choose to leave the house alone.

and bring your son with me. Worried about stepmother.

It's not good for your own children, this kind of thinking will definitely be there. The breakdown of a marriage can cause unspeakable pain to both husband and wife, and for children, it is even more likely to cause lifelong physical and mental damage.

The breakdown of the relationship between the spouses leads to divorce

Every couple, when they enter the marriage hall, I believe that they must start a new journey of life with the beautiful vision of a lifetime and a couple. However, as we walk, some marriages go astray. When the marriage is implemented to the chai, rice, oil, salt, sauce, vinegar, tea.

In the triviality, many couples suddenly find that the marriage in reality is a chicken feather.

It's not what I imagined it to be. Therefore, the quarrel and the cold war finally exhausted the only feelings and went directly to the end of the marriage. <>

Should a woman take her son with her after a divorce?

Divorce may be painful for two adults for a while, but time is the best medicine, and it will slowly lead to a wound, and it may also enter the next relationship. After the divorce, the most hurt is actually the children of two people. The question of the child's belonging is also a blunt knife that tears the child's young heart, and the child is bruised all over the body.

It may cause psychological damage to the child that will not be able to ** for the rest of his life. Whether a woman should take children in divorce or not is also a matter of opinion. But personally, I don't think it can be generalized.

What do you think?

I think so, mother and child are connected, and if a woman wants to take care of her children after divorce, the question of whether she should take children should be considered from the perspective of whether it is beneficial to the children. As a mother, this is especially true of you, and you can't be rash. It is important to minimize the damage of divorce to the child, so that the child knows that although the parents are separated, they still love him.

No, because everyone has to live for themselves, if a woman divorces with a son, it is impossible for her to be happy, and there will be no man who loves you.

I think you must take your son with you after the divorce, because your son is the meat that fell from your body, and a man may lie to you and may not love you, but your son will definitely love you very much, so you must take him with you.

I think you should take your son with you, and the child will grow up by your side, so that the relationship between mother and son will be good, and don't care about other people's eyes.

Legal analysis: Whether a divorced woman wants to take children depends on the woman's economic conditions and is based on the physical and mental development of the children. It is recommended that the woman have children after divorce, which is conducive to caring for the physical and mental health of the children to a greater extent, if the woman has no financial ** or poor living ability, for the healthy development of the children, it is not recommended that the woman have children after the divorce.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1085:After divorce, where children are directly raised by one party, the other party shall bear part or all of the child support. The amount of the cost to be borne and the length of the period shall be agreed upon by both parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment. The agreement or judgment provided for in the preceding paragraph does not prevent the child from making a reasonable demand to either parent in excess of the amount originally set forth in the agreement or judgment when necessary.

Article 1086:After a divorce, the parent who does not directly raise the children has the right to visit the children, and the other party has the obligation to assist. The method and time for exercising visitation rights are to be agreed upon by the parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment. Where a parent's visit to a child is detrimental to the child's physical and psychological health, the people's court is to suspend the visit in accordance with law; Visits shall be resumed after the reason for the suspension has disappeared.

Hello, dear, I'm happy to answer for you, if you are cautious now divorced, and still have two children, then the first thing you have to do is to work hard to make money, because after all, the two children are still young, and they will pay back their studies and lives in the future, and they will have a lot of money, so relatives should not be limited by the current divorce scenario, but should work hard to make money, and secondly, if you really can't accept the current life of the wide shirt, then you can go on a blind date and find one, People who understand you are better off getting married. But at this time, you still have to be honest with your children, and tell them that their hearts are full of sunshine, so that they can live a peaceful life in the future.

Not good. Sell with a liter.

1. A divorced father with a daughter will have a certain impact on his daughter, and the child will lack maternal love.

2. After all, there is a gender difference between daughters and fathers, and fathers may not be able to take care of all kinds of things that daughters tease, and they can't popularize women's knowledge, so it's not good.

It's not good or not, it's good to have a snack according to the age of the child, the child has a period, or other privacy hail family problems The father is embarrassed to ask these, so there is still a leak of a good relationship source to search for female relatives and friends.

There's nothing bad about it, and if you really can't get by, separating is the best option.

Hello dear<> if you divorce, if you ask me whether I choose to have my daughter or son, I think it's just a heart-piercing sentence. It is also a dilemma. The palms of the hands and the backs of the hands are full of meat, how can you say, want this or not that?

It was a painful choice, I think. Two children should be kept together. As long as the two people negotiate before the divorce, even if they give more alimony.

You should also let your children stay together, after all, you have to be responsible for having a child. Instead of making children feel like a piece of grass in the eyes of their parents. Anyone can take it away, and no one cares about her anymore and loves her.

No one will give him the kind of sunshine and rain like fatherly love and mother's love. This is what a single-parent family thinks after divorce. So seriously, don't be so cruel to make a choice.

Let's think about the living situation of the family together. Try to keep the child with her mother. Then give them five sons more money to make their lives more stable, which is the best choice.