What is the understanding of social fairness at the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of

The 15 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) held that social fairness does not refer to absolute fairness, but to the control of income disparity within a reasonable range.

Social fairness is an issue of general concern to the current society, and our party's understanding of social fairness has gone through a process from "time is life, efficiency is money", to "efficiency first, taking into account fairness", and then to "both efficiency and fairness should be taken into account in both primary distribution and redistribution, and redistribution should pay more attention to fairness".

This kind of social equity is more useful for society, so it is a very good situation to be able to understand it in a timely manner.

What are the party's 15 points of understanding of social justice? Social fairness and everything are rigorously equal before the law, and everyone is equal before the law.

What is the understanding of social fairness at the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of China? The 15 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China mainly talked about some policies between the peasants and the common people, which are beneficial to the people.

The 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of China: Adhere to the priority of efficiency and fairness.

The 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China: Initial distribution focuses on efficiency, and redistribution focuses on fairness.

The 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China: The relationship between efficiency and fairness should be properly handled in both primary distribution and redistribution, and redistribution should pay more attention to fairness.

Efficiency first, fairness in mind.

The 15 th National Congress of the Communist Party of China also had a very competitive understanding of social fairness.

Efficiency first, fairness in mind.

First of all, adhering to the principle of "giving priority to efficiency and taking into account fairness" is a long-term policy, and fairness must be built on the basis of efficiency, and efficiency must be sustained only on the premise of fairness. At present, some of the problems that have arisen in promoting efficiency and maintaining fairness are not that there is any problem with this policy itself, but that it has not really brought efficiency into full play and that fairness can be taken into account. Fairness in the initial stage of socialism can only be relative, and we cannot leave the level of productive forces to make empty promises and blindly raise appetites.

Second, there are differences in the division of labor between efficiency and fairness, and the ways to achieve this are also different. The primary distribution should focus on efficiency and play the role of the "invisible hand" of the market; Secondary distribution should focus on fairness and play the role of the "visible hand".

Third, in order to truly solve the problem of social equity, it is necessary to expand the proportion of middle-income earners and change the social income structure from a pyramid shape in which there are few high-income earners and many low-income earners to an olive-shaped shape in which middle-income earners are the main body and high-income earners account for a minority.

Significance: Income distribution adheres to the principle of "efficiency first, taking into account fairness", that is, the distribution according to work and the contribution of production factors are put in the first place, and the results are appropriately redistributed to prevent the income gap from being too large in the second place; That is, the market distribution to serve the efficiency goal is the first, and the first adjustment to ensure the necessary income fairness is the second; That is, the incentive effect of income distribution is the first, and its protection or "insurance" role is the second.

The two issues of fairness and efficiency are an eternal theme in economics, and fairness is generally divided into fairness of opportunity and fairness of results. For example, employment, whether there is employment opportunity or not is the fairness of opportunity, and the level of income is the fairness of the result. Now more attention is paid to the equality of outcomes, but from the perspective of economic development, it may be more important to have equality of opportunity, and of course the results of the same opportunities are also different.

The above content reference: Guangming Network - adhere to the efficiency of the priority and fairness.

Cognition is repetitive and infinite, and man's understanding of truth is relative.

Therefore, on the basis of the common struggle of all the people and economic and social development, we must step up the construction of a system that plays a major role in ensuring social fairness and righteousness, and gradually establish a social justice and Tongping security system. Common prosperity is the fundamental principle of socialism with Chinese characteristics, so it is necessary to make the fruits of development more and more equitable to benefit all people, and make steady progress in the direction of common prosperity.

Relevant resolutions and initiatives of the Party

Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the relevant resolutions and measures of the Party have shown that the level of understanding and attention of the Party and state leaders to the rule of law and its role in governing the country has reached an unprecedented new height.

The degree of rule of law in a country is a criterion for judging the modernization of the country, and no organization or individual may have privileges that go beyond the Constitution and the law, and it is absolutely forbidden to substitute words for the law, suppress the law with power, or bend the law for personal gain.

The Fourth Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee stressed the rule of law, which reaffirmed the status and dignity of the law, and only the rule of law can avoid the privatization of public power and the domestication of public servants, and the message conveyed to the public is to hand over the right to speak to the law, not to a certain person.