Is state holding and state monopoly a concept

Not a concept in theory!

There are two types of state-controlled enterprises, one is state-owned enterprises and the other is mixed-ownership enterprises.

In international practice, state-owned enterprises only refer to enterprises invested or controlled by a national or federal government; In China, state-owned enterprises also include enterprises controlled by local ** investment. The will and interests of the state-owned enterprises determine the behavior.

Mixed-ownership enterprises are only part of state-owned enterprises, generally belonging to the lifeblood of the state of mixed-ownership enterprises are controlled by the state, it contains both state-owned components, but also contains non-public components, state-controlled mixed-ownership enterprises are controlled by the state, the shares of the enterprise account for the majority of the shares divided by the enterprise, so it is called state-controlled mixed-ownership enterprises.

The state monopoly refers to the state-owned enterprises, that is, the holding enterprises in the market because of the large market share in the industry and relatively few competitors, usually by raising the first level to implement monopoly, so as to increase the profits of the enterprise. However, not all state-controlled enterprises are monopolistic industries, and many state-owned enterprises are in a competitive market and do not have a monopoly market position.

But in fact, in the socialist market economy with Chinese characteristics, the state-run economy occupies the lifeblood of the national economy, and state-owned assets occupy a dominant position in industries related to national interests.

Hope mine helps you!

Not a concept.

State holdings are for the company level. The shares of a company are mainly controlled by the state, such as state-owned enterprises, and the control of the company is in the hands of the public.

The state monopoly is aimed at the market or industry. The oil industry, for example, is monopolized by state-owned enterprises Sinopec and PetroChina.

Original Void Sun Yin: Poor Chain.

1) With the high development of the scientific and technological revolution and the socialization of production, the accumulation of private monopoly capital can no longer meet the necessary conditions for social reproduction, and must be invested by the state or financed by the state for private capital.

2) The rule of private monopoly expands the contradiction between capitalist production and consumption, and the state must take certain measures to intervene in the deficit national economy to alleviate the degree of economic crisis and alleviate social contradictions.

3) With the intensification of the economic development imbalance in the post-war capitalist countries, it is difficult to solve the economic turmoil caused by structural imbalance by relying solely on the power of private monopoly capital and the spontaneous adjustment of the market, and it is necessary to rely on the state to take administrative or economic measures to adjust the structure of the national economy.

All these reasons have led to tremendous changes in the state and its functions, prompting the combination of state power and private monopoly capital. Therefore, the transformation from a private monopoly to a state monopoly is objectively inevitable.

Essence: In essence, it is a form of monopoly bourgeoisie that dominates social capital and exploits working people to the maximum, and its activities are mainly to promote the movement of private monopoly capital and ensure that private monopoly capital obtains high profits. It buys goods and services from private monopolies at low prices and from private monopolies.

It promotes the improvement of the technological level of the national economy and the transformation of the sectoral and regional structures, and creates favorable conditions for the reproduction of private monopoly capital. State monopoly capital is a higher and more concentrated form of capital socialization than private monopoly enterprises, and it is more suitable for the requirements of the socialized development of production to a certain extent. On the other hand, however, its emergence and development also reflected the obsolescence of the capitalist system of private ownership, which undoubtedly posed a great threat to the capitalist system, and the monopoly bourgeoisie therefore tried to restrict the development of state-owned monopolies, and when conditions were favorable, it carried out "denationalization" and changed state-owned enterprises into private enterprises again.