If there are deficiencies or faults in laws and regulations, where to complain and suggest

Submit proposals directly to the regulatory or designated authorities of the law.

The best time is when the official website is recently considered for revision, and it is recommended to submit it at the time of the solicitation campaign.

According to the system prompt of the suggested content, write clearly which specific provision it is, and say the reason for their proposed amendment, if you can't find the relevant laws, you can according to the address and zip code prompted on the page, the status of the mail can not be queried, ** letter can be found like express mail status.

The title of the mailed written materials should read: Application for Legal Proposal or Legal Review Proposal, which is not suitable for writing a letter-or-visit letter.

Or visit the official website of the National People's Congress, and click on the Internet petition on the left.

See. Article 13 of the Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China A delegation or 30 or more deputies may jointly submit a bill to the National People's Congress, and the presidium shall decide whether to include it in the agenda of the session, or first submit it to the relevant special committee for deliberation and put forward opinions on whether to include it in the agenda of the session, and then decide whether to include it in the agenda of the session. During deliberations by special committees, the sponsors may be invited to attend the meeting as observers and express their opinions.

If the relevant laws and regulations are found to be insufficient, individual citizens can make suggestions to the people's congress deputies, and the people's congress deputies will put forward proposals or propose amendments to the standing committee of the people's congress through letters and visits. However, in practice, it is largely ineffective.

Because our country has not yet established a system of constitutional review, there are many shortcomings in this regard.

If you can't complain, you can write a letter to the law-making authority such as the people's congress or the first department, or to the National People's Congress or the provincial people's congress to respond, of course, you can also speak online now, in order to attract the attention of relevant units and individuals.

Well, in general, it's useless.

This is because criminal proceedings in China can only be directed at specific administrative acts, not abstract administrative acts, let alone laws and regulations.

The reviewer of the report shall be jointly responsible with you, and the General Principles of the Civil Law of China Chapter 6, Section 4 134 stipulates that the main ways to bear civil liability are:

a) Cease the violation;

ii) removal of obstacles;

iii) Elimination of hazards;

(iv) Return of property;

(v) restitution;

6) Repair, rework and replacement;

vii) Compensation for losses;

8) Payment of liquidated damages;

(ix) Elimination of influence and restoration of reputation;

10) Apologize.

It's not a big responsibility, just apologize, and don't make a mistake next time you report it.

Asking a professional lawyer is not reliable.

This is not needed, rest assured.

1. When a person without civil capacity is infringed upon by an educational institution, the educational institution shall be presumed to be liable for fault.

2. The presumption of fault liability of medical institutions in the following cases:

1) Violation of laws, administrative regulations, rules and other relevant provisions on diagnosis and treatment norms;

2) Concealing or refusing to provide medical records related to the dispute;

3) Falsifying, tampering with or destroying medical records.

3. The presumption of fault liability of the owner and manager in the illegal possession of highly dangerous goods.

4. The zoo's presumption of fault liability.

5. Presumptive liability for damage caused by the fall or fall of buildings, structures or other facilities.

6. Infringement of stacked objects.

7. Infringement of forest tree breakage.

8. The presumption of fault liability of the manhole manager.

First, the Tort Liability Law stipulates that if the actor cannot prove that they are not at fault, the actor is presumed to be at fault and shall be liable for damages. Where the presumption of fault is applied, the perpetrator must bear the burden of proof that he is not at fault if he is not to be liable.

1. When a person without civil capacity is infringed upon by an educational institution, the educational institution shall be presumed liable for fault (Article 38 of the Tort Liability Law); 2. The presumption of fault liability of medical institutions under the following circumstances (Article 58) (1) Violation of laws, administrative regulations, rules and other relevant provisions of diagnosis and treatment norms; 2) Concealing or refusing to provide medical records related to the dispute; 3) Falsifying, tampering with or destroying medical records. 3. Presumptive liability of the owner or manager of illegal possession of highly dangerous goods (Article 75) 4. Presumptive liability of the zoo (Article 81) 5. Presumptive liability for damage to others caused by the falling off or fall of buildings, structures or other facilities (Article 85) 6. Infringement of stacked objects (Article 88) 7. Infringement of forest breaking (Article 90) 8. Presumptive liability of the fault of the manhole manager (Article 91).

You are directly violating the law by the unit. If the labor contract is not signed, the employee has the right to request the employer to pay double the salary and economic compensation;

According to Article 37 of the Labor Contract Law, an employee may terminate the labor contract without compensation if he or she notifies the employer in writing 30 days in advance.

If it is illegal to pay wages or overtime pay in full, the employee has the right to request the employer to pay economic compensation according to Article 46 of the Labor Contract Law;

If the social security is not paid, the unit can be requested to make up the payment;

If the employer refuses, it can apply for labor arbitration.

Article 41 of the Labor Law [Extension of Working Hours] Due to the needs of production and operation, an employer may extend its working hours after consultation with the labor union and the workers, and generally shall not exceed one hour per day; If it is necessary to extend the working hours due to special reasons, the extended working hours shall not exceed three hours per day, but shall not exceed thirty-six hours per month, provided that the health of the worker is guaranteed.

Article 43 [No Illegal Extension of Working Hours] Employers shall not extend the working hours of employees in violation of the provisions of this Law.

According to the above provisions, if the employee works overtime in serious cases, the employee can file a complaint with the local labor inspection department for resolution and request that the case be filed.

1. Report to the local labor inspection department.

Good luck!

The unit is seriously violating the law; It is recommended that you solve the problem all at once.

1. If the labor contract is not signed, according to Article 82 of the Labor Contract Law, the employee has the right to request the employer to pay double wages and economic compensation;

2. According to Article 37 of the Labor Contract Law, the employee may terminate the labor contract without compensation if he notifies the employer in writing 30 days in advance;

3. If it is illegal to pay wages or overtime pay in full, according to Article 46 of the Labor Contract Law, the employee has the right to request the employer to pay economic compensation;

4. If you have not paid social security, you can ask the unit to make up the payment;

5. If the unit refuses, it can apply for labor arbitration.

If overtime is not scheduled without prior consultation, it can be refused. The company is giving you ten times the overtime pay, and when your body tells you that you can't afford it, maybe you don't value overtime pay anymore. Therefore, there is an extremely scientific reason for the socialist law to stipulate that laborers work eight hours a day.

People are not machines for overtime, and the law stipulates that there shall be no more than 40 hours per week, and overtime shall be negotiated with the worker, and shall not exceed 36 hours per month. If the company has seriously violated the law, you can inform the company in writing to arrange another person to hand over the work after eight hours, and if a dispute arises as a result, you can submit it to the labor dispute agency for handling. If the company threatens to impose a fine or dismissal for not working overtime, it may file a complaint with the labor inspectorate after obtaining evidence.

Be cautious in the process of defending your rights. Don't act aggressively.

According to the provisions of the Marriage Law, if a divorce is caused by bigamy, cohabitation of a spouse with another person, domestic violence, abuse, or abandonment of a family member, the innocent party has the right to claim high compensation for the damages. If the perpetrator violates different legal provisions at the same time for the same act, he will bear the legal consequences of different natures - for example, in the case of the case you mentioned, the bigamist violates both the Marriage Law and the Criminal Law, and therefore has to bear both civil liability under the Marriage Law and criminal liability for committing the crime of bigamy (punishable by imprisonment of not more than two years or criminal detention).

In the division of property, the party at fault may not be divided or less.

Ms. Qiao is the owner of a business department in Jianhu County, Jiangsu Province. One day, a friend introduced her to a person who looked like a salesman. The person claimed to be a buyer and salesman of an electrical appliance company in Cixi, Zhejiang, because the company was in urgent need of cash, and wanted to transfer a bank acceptance draft with an amount of 50,000 yuan.

After the bank checked the authenticity, Ms. Qiao happily used the **** bill of 49,500 yuan. In a later business, Ms. Qiao used this "***" money order.

Unexpectedly, the real ticket was denied.

However, the "***" bill of exchange did not circulate smoothly. When the customer asked the bank for payment, he was refused, so he approached Ms. Qiao and asked for a "refund". In desperation, Ms. Qiao also gave the customer 50,000 yuan, and the bill of exchange was returned to her.

Why is it rejected by the bank when it is a genuine money order? Ms. Qiao came to the chargeback bank to find out the situation. It turned out that this bill of exchange was applied for and issued by an electrical appliance company in Cixi, and was later paid to a plastic factory in Cixi, which in turn transferred it to a quartz company in Lianyungang, Jiangsu, but the people of the quartz company lost it on the way back to Jiangsu.

As a result, the quartz company applied to the Cixi Court for a public notice, and the court issued a notice to the bank paying the bill of exchange to stop payment. After that, Quartz Company took 50,000 yuan from the bill of exchange.

Losing the lawsuit in exchange for a lesson.

Unexpectedly, she spent nearly 50,000 yuan in exchange for a piece of waste paper, so Ms. Qiao filed a lawsuit with the Cixi Court in the name of the business department.

Ms. Qiao believes that she has obtained the bill of exchange in a legal manner, and should be the legal holder of the bill of exchange and enjoy the rights on the bill. The quartz company's application for publicity and reminder is improper, and she should be held liable. Cixi's electrical appliance company and plastic factory, as debtors on the bill of exchange, should also be held liable to them.

However, during the trial, Ms. Qiao could not produce evidence that she had purchased the bill of exchange.

Finally, the Cixi Court held that Ms. Qiao's business department was subjectively grossly negligent when obtaining the bill, and therefore did not enjoy the rights on the bill, so it ruled against the plaintiff.

I think it's harder. First of all, you go to buy medicine instead of going to the doctor, and the staff who sell the medicine will suggest it, but the choice is up to you. Second, it's hard for you to provide evidence of which drugs he recommends you buy.

Of course, you can negotiate with him, and if the negotiation fails, you can consider taking a lawsuit to breathe a sigh of relief, but it is unlikely that you will win the case. However, if you do file a lawsuit, you can bring a voice recorder, go to the pharmacist theorize, and skillfully ask questions to elicit the whole process of facts.

Diagnostic errors, which require identification.

It's not just another outpatient doctor who said it.

Anyway, it's a lot of trouble.

Even if the doctor says it, he won't testify for you.

You can go directly to the pharmacy staff, if there is no solution, you should report the pharmacy, and the general pharmacy should be responsible for the drugs prescribed by the pharmacy except for the drugs purchased by the patient himself (according to the name of the drug). Serious prosecutable,

Theoretically, it can be refunded, but it is more troublesome to operate, you can go to the pharmacy to negotiate first, if not, you can go to the consumer association to try.