History Short Answer Questions 20, History Exam Paper Short Answer Questions

1. It is necessary to reform, but from the standpoint of the landlord class. Although the abolition of slavery was detrimental to the interests of the landlords and the tsar, Alexander II had to do so to preserve his greater feudal interests.

2. It shows that the tsar represents the interests of the big landowners, and although he had to carry out serfdom reforms, the feudal remnants will be retained in the reforms, and they will not be thorough.

The rulers promised the ruling class that they would protect their property, private rights.

Respect for the law.

1. This passage of the Tsar shows that everything I am doing now is actually beneficial to the landlord class.

2. It shows that the purpose of Alexander II's reforms was to protect the interests of the landlords and consolidate the rule of the landlord class. Therefore, Alexander II's reforms, whether it was the emancipation decree or the reform of local self-government and justice, were aimed at protecting the interests of the landlords.

1. After the Crimean War, Alexander realized that only through reform could the contradictions be resolved and his rule consolidated. However, the reform will inevitably touch the interests of the feudal landlords, and in the course of the reform, he will try his best to safeguard the interests of the landlord class. 2. It shows that the reform of serfdom is a bourgeois reform under the auspices of feudal landlords, and the fundamental reason is to maintain feudal rule; incomplete reforms; Deceptive.

1.The meaning of this passage is that in order to protect the interests of the landlord class, he used all his strength.

2.This passage shows that Alexander II's reform program was not a bloody revolution like in France and pushing the bourgeoisie into the political arena, but to use his greatest strength to abolish serfdom and stabilize the elements of social disharmony without changing the main body of society.

Summary. After the great geographical discoveries, the West used its economic strength and military power to turn many regions into its own colonies and slaughter them at will in order to obtain more wealth. A case in point is the British East India Company, which took £5.26 million worth of wealth from the Bangladeshi treasury and made a windfall through its monopoly in India.

This kind of colonialism not only harms the interests of the local people, but also undermines the local economic and social order and seriously affects the local development. Therefore, the actions of Western colonialism are unshirkable and should be condemned and sanctioned.

Material 4, Question 4.

That's the ** question.

Okay? After the great geographical discoveries, the West used its economic and military power to turn many regions into its own penny colonies and slaughtered them at will, while Biqi obtained more wealth. A case in point is the British East India Company, which took £5.26 million worth of wealth from the Bangladeshi treasury and made a windfall through its monopoly in India.

This kind of colonialism not only harms the interests of the local people, but also undermines the local economic and social order and seriously affects the local development. Therefore, the righteous acts of the Western colonial masters are unshirkable and should be condemned and sanctioned.

Which point of view is this?

Based on the point of view that 3 refines.

What's the point? This kind of colonialism not only harms the interests of the local people, but also undermines the local economic and social order and seriously affects the local development. Therefore, the actions of Western colonialism are unshirkable and should be condemned and sanctioned.

This is the core point, and the foreshadowing is ahead.

June-August 1842 Opium War, October 1846-1860, Second Opium War, July 1894-April 1895, Sino-Japanese War, End of the 19th century, Eight-Nation Allied War of Aggression against China.

From the 60s to the 90s of the 19th century, I didn't learn the Westernization Movement.2.

3. Didn't learn.

Myths are handed down when history is not clear, and we cannot deny it, but those unrealistic myths only have a certain literary value, but some myths can be used to study history.

You seem to like history very much, I really want to help you, but my memory is not very good, I can only say that I have tested the knowledge in the book, hehe.

(1) The old Three People's Principles: nationality, civil rights, and people's livelihood.

The New Three People's Principles: United Russia, United Communist Party, and support for peasants and workers.

The program of democratic revolution advocated by Sun Yat-sen is composed of ism, populism, and people's livelihood, referred to as the "Three People's Principles". The development process of the Three People's Principles is divided into two stages, namely the old Three People's Principles and the new Three People's Principles. It is the precious spiritual heritage of the Chinese people.