Will the living environment in rural areas surpass that of urban areas in the future? What do you th

In the future, the natural environment of rural living will exceed that of the city, this topic discussion I personally feel that the rural natural environment is not as good as the city at this stage, but the air index of the countryside is much better and refreshing than the city, which is also a major advantage of the rural area at this stage, the environmental quality is better than the city, the rural middle and late stage must develop is the house living and the surrounding environment, at this stage the rural house production difference is uneven, because it is not a unified residence, so I personally feel that the next 3-5 years of such changes are not big, In terms of the natural environment, the pollution of the rural environment is relatively mild and <>

Compared with the city, the rural environmental pollution rate only accounts for one or two percent, because the countryside only burns fires for cooking, and others like factory pollution, there are very few processing plants in the countryside, so it is not environmental pollution, and the urban processing plants are more and the development speed is faster, so the environmental pollution is also very serious in terms of conditions, which is a personal opinion If the countryside wants to surpass the city, I think the probability is not large, and the city is often called the city because the city has more land resources to build factories and houses. The soil in the countryside is all agricultural land, and if you want to convert it into commercial land, most farmers will have no land to plant, and <>

It is possible that some people feel that it is okay to have land subsidies for rural areas without farming, but it is necessary to remember that if peasant households do not farm, China's overall grain crop income will decline, which is related to the problem of the whole industrial chain, and it is inconvenient to talk about it more, as we all know that the number of people living in a place is more or less, and the accumulation of capital is a very important situation. If the population lives in a large number or the poor households are in the majority, how can the living standards and living conditions be better? Their own lives have not improved, and there are idle assets to invest in the surrounding equipment of life.

The level of local development is also crucial, because you have a position in your local area to continue this development, or the economy can be developed, <>

It is suitable for the corresponding equipment in the countryside, such as the infrastructure construction of the education sector and the infrastructure construction of the medical industry, so that high-end and excellent instruments and machinery can be slowly introduced. For example, if the level of development in your local area is not very high, there is cultural education, but there are very few excellent teachers who want to rush to this kind of area for development. For example, if the local standard development is not very good, and the medical system is not very good, then in this case, excellent doctors or some excellent talents will not rush to work in this position.

The future living environment in the countryside will surpass that of the city, because life in the countryside is very comfortable, with mountains and rivers.

Personally, I think that the natural environment in the countryside is not as good as in the city at this stage, but the air quality index in the countryside is much better and cleaner than in the city, which is also a major advantage of the countryside at this stage.

There is this possibility, after all, the rural plot ratio is relatively small, there is more greenery, and the environment must be more comfortable.

I prefer city life, but I'm willing to choose to live in the countryside.

I like the bustling city and the uninhibited life. City life can be said to make me feel very comfortable, living in the city is extremely convenient, I can basically order takeout if I need anything, and the variety of items is also very complete, which can fully meet all my life needs; Moreover, most people in the city will be more open-minded than people in the countryside, even if you are old and single, you will not be looked at by others in a strange way, and you will not be constantly urged to marry; In addition, city life is also very colorful, because now the city is a paradise for young people, and we can often connect with each other in the city.

As for the countryside, country life is boring, and the only point is probably that the pace is slow. My hometown is a small town, a quaint town, the pace of life is very slow, you can leisurely sit by the river with a group of people to fish or gossip about homely things; There is usually no takeout to order, so you can only cook by yourself, and the family can often eat together; If you feel tired, you can sit in the sun room at home and soak up the warm sunlight for a few hours. In short, life in the countryside is leisurely and comfortable, making you feel like you have stepped into your old age.

So I prefer city life, but I prefer to live in the countryside. After graduating, I have been in the city, away from the countryside that I feel bored, I live comfortably and happily in the city, but at the same time I feel lonely and tired. Although I like city life, I have a slower temperament and am more suitable for the slow pace of country life, so I have now returned to my hometown and opened a small shop.

Although I will also feel tired and bored, but comfortable and free, I can also occasionally drive to the city to meet three or five friends together, so it is the best of both worlds, after all, although the city is good, I will always have no sense of belonging, and although the countryside is average, it makes me very quiet in the bottom of my heart.

Whether the rural areas will live in a concentrated manner in the future is also a more effective way to complete the construction of infrastructure, and it should be said that such a direction is now being considered. However, in some places, the pilot trial was implemented, and it was found that the effect was not as good as imagined, so it was not really implemented on a large scale. <>

Because the rural areas are relatively remote, and the distribution of residents is relatively scattered, many infrastructure services cannot be perfected and perfected. Because the population in urban areas is relatively dense, it is easier to order a takeaway and deliver a courier, and even say that the door-to-door service is relatively easy, but the rural areas are too scattered, there may be dozens of hundreds of households in one village, and another village is 5 kilometers away, and the cost of this service is too high. To improve infrastructure, it is necessary to increase population concentration.

But later I found out that there are advantages and disadvantages to living in a centralized area, because everyone is originally divided into rural areas, and it is more dispersed because of the land, after all, there are so many people in a village, and everyone needs land to survive. If you want to continue planting, what will happen to those farm tools? What about the income of these farmers who do not continue to grow**?

He has been a farmer for generations, and now that he suddenly has a centralized residence, will he immediately become a local employee of the company? Does he have a stable income, and what is the use of them having a stable income together? If we can't solve the problem of income, then other infrastructure construction and the like will be in vain.

Because if people in this place have no money, he has no spending power, even if a bus is built, a subway is built, and takeaway can be delivered to the door, so what's the use? He has no money, he can't afford these services, he has difficulty surviving, how can he have the ability to spend. Therefore, centralized living was implemented on a pilot basis before, but later it was found that it was not so perfect.

It is possible, because with the continuous development of the economy, more and more people live in the city, but when they live in the city, they will find that the city is not as good as they imagined, and when they are old, they still want to go back to the countryside to live, the rural environment is very beautiful, the air is very fresh, the water is very clear, which helps our health.

I think so, if the countryside wants to develop, it must be concentrated on housing, so that we can better build medical care and education.

Yes, I think it is very possible, in the future, some projects will definitely be developed in the countryside, and the people in the countryside will definitely be moved to a gathering place to live.

I think that if the population is seriously aging, maybe the rural areas will really live in a concentrated area in the future, because the elderly like to go to the countryside.

I like rural life very much, but I don't necessarily adapt to rural life after living in the city for a long time. ......The reason for this is that rural life is full of idyllic scenery, rural life is more comfortable and comfortable, and there are some inconveniences in rural life.

1. Rural life is full of idyllic scenery, so I like it very much.

The most important feature of rural life is that it is full of idyllic scenery. ......In the countryside, there is natural scenery everywhere, and no matter where you are, you feel happy and happy. ......Moreover, you can enjoy all kinds of green food at any time in rural life, and life is healthy and happy.

This idyllic life is exactly what I aspire to. ......Because of this, I really like life in the countryside and want to live in the countryside for a while.

2. The pace of rural life is slower and more comfortable, and I like this state of life very much.

Compared to the fast-paced city life, rural life is slower and more idyllic and natural. ......For older people, rural life is more comfortable and comfortable, which is very much in line with their own characteristics, and such a life will make them feel happier. ......Because of this, most of the people who yearn for rural life are ...... older people like meEnergetic young people prefer city life.

3. There is a certain inconvenience in rural life, and I may not be able to adapt to such a life.

Although I like rural life very much and yearn for rural life, the reality tells me that I may not be able to adapt to the rural life ......Specifically, there is a certain gap between rural life, clothing, food, housing and transportation compared with urban life, and in many cases, you need to do a lot of housework by yourself to take care of your own life. This is obviously not suitable for myself who has lived in the city for a long time. ......So, for me, going on a short-term vacation in the countryside is not a problem at all, but if I want to live in the countryside for a long time, I don't feel comfortable.

This question is not good, because the argument of "good" or "bad" depends largely on the individual's living habits, value orientation, career planning and other factors. Here are some of my personal perspectives on rural and urban areas:

Pros of living in the countryside:

1.Excellent natural environment: The natural environment in rural areas can be described as very beautiful, the sanitary environment is better than that of the city, and it is also bad enough to breathe fresh air.

2.Low cost of living: The cost of living and prices in rural areas are lower than those in urban areas, and the pressure on living is relatively small.

3.Relative tranquility: Relatively speaking, the population density is smaller, the pace of life in the countryside is slower than in the city, and the people are relatively quiet.

Pros of living in the city:

2.Convenient transportation: The city has perfect facilities and convenient transportation, so that people can travel, study and live more conveniently.

3.Better medical and educational facilities: Cities have more advanced medical and educational facilities than rural areas, and people are more able to enjoy better doctors and education.

Overall, whether you live in a rural or urban area, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and choosing a place to live needs to take into account the individual's conditions and preferences. For some people, it is pleasant to take care of the ecology of nature in the countryside, while others like the culture, business opportunities and conveniences of the city, and each choice has its own reasonable factors, and it is important that the decision is in line with the individual's life plan and vision.

If you are a farmer farming in the countryside, you go to the city to live where it is called, so the type of work is matched with the fierce counterpart, don't be too face-saving and vanity.