Which is higher in science or Buddhism

Each has its own strengths, and when it comes to studying the relationship between objects, science is second to none; In the study of the relationship between the mind and the heart, there is no such thing as a teaching. If we can solve the problem of the relationship between the object and the mind, then we will definitely find a common language.

The empirical evidence of science is implemented in the reasoning of the left brain, and the empirical evidence of Buddhism is implemented in the direct perception of the right brain.

The highest state of Buddhism is the great unity, including the unity of the left and right brains.

The goal of science is the study of all existence, including the state of great unity.

The great unification of course also includes the unification of Buddhism and science.

The left brain is constantly differentiating, the right brain is constantly integrating and distinction, and the left and right brains are opposing and unifying, constantly surpassing the past.

There is no end to evolution, there is no end to science, and the Buddha always has to come back to work, otherwise he will be backward and outdated.

Discriminating mind is the basis of human evolution and the reason for the existence of Buddhism.

Science is based on the separation of minds, a deviation from the previously fixed unified realm, and a separation of subject and object. The meaning of Buddhism's existence is to tolerate this deviation, to carry out a higher level of unity with this deviation, and to carry out a higher level of unity of subject and object. Constantly deviating, deviating and returning, returning and deviating, and returning.

The left and right brains are unified in the right brain, the human body is unified in the mind, and reasoning and direct perception are unified in direct perception. Dialectical materialism holds that matter and spirit are unified with matter. These views are all in agreement.

Inferential arguments must be based on certain assumptions, which are all approximations of reality. The results of science cannot transcend relative truth. The intuitive perception is the unity of the direct and cognitive object, so it is in line with reality, but everyone's intuitive perception is different, and the level of unity with the environment is also different, only a few people can achieve the ultimate enlightenment, this level must surpass the current science.

But science is also evolving, and who can predict what will happen to science when scientists also become Buddhist practitioners?

These are two systems and cannot be directly compared. It's like an argumentConfuciuswithAlbert EinsteinIt is meaningless to see who is greater.

Science is the accumulation of knowledge, not wisdom, and today's science is tomorrow's unscience, and the great wisdom of Buddhism is on the other side, and there is no comparison between prajna jackfruit.

Science, that is, this subject does not know which subject! It's like countless tubes, each with its own science inside! It's right in this tube, it's wrong in that tube!

Buddhism, on the other hand, is about where the pipe comes from and where it goes, and the ingredients and results must be understood! So there's really no comparison!

Hello! The question you asked, big :

First of all, from the perspective of Western experimental science: most of the problems involving science can be quantified in order to carry out qualitative and quantitative analysis, and our complex world today is based on this systematic experimental science, so science is based on mathematics; Buddhism is a religion introduced to China from India during the Han Dynasty, founded by Shakyamuni Buddha, emphasizing the emptiness of the four majors, the pursuit of enlightenment, liberation, nirvana, and more emphasis on spiritual epiphany and state. The two penetrate each other, but it is difficult to integrate with each other;

From a philosophical point of view, scientific problems require conceptual judgment and reasoning with the help of rigorous logic, and science without rigorous logical support will be defined as pseudoscience; When it comes to the problems of Buddhism, most of them are taught by words and deeds, vipassana and introspection, emphasizing self-interest and altruism, and finally breaking off evil views and entering the state of nirvana. Between the two, they collided with each other and evolved, forming the current state of coexistence;

From my own experience, I think that most of the problems of science are to be concretized and expressed in a language that everyone can understand, but this involves: the speaker, the way of expression and the audience, which is the most difficult action in human social life

This is true of Maxwell's equations, the relationship between mass and energy, the special theory of relativity, the universe, and even Newton's laws, which few people can understand when they first appeared; When most people understand it, they find that this theory is not perfect, so they fall into a cycle, the most typical example is the world's largest and the world's smallest, so all science has its own scope of application; Buddhism, different from science, only in the world, in an instant, six roots, six dusts and eight consciousnesses, the four major harmony to achieve the world of sava, subjective and objective are both alayya, one flower and five leaves, to break greed, hatred, ignorance and suspicion, you can open up the relevant wisdom, and then get rid of life and death and achieve nirvana.

Everything has a way, like a dream bubble, like dew and electricity, and should be viewed as such.

Buddhism cannot solve the problems that high numbers can solve; But the problems that Buddhism can solve, high mathematics may not necessarily be impossible to solve. Hehe.

The so-called science, really easy, phenomenon, for example, the current machinery in the countryside is not brought by science? What does the improvement of living standards have to do with the Buddha? Since the Buddha is so powerful, why don't you make something real, I think the scope of Buddhism's ability is limited, and I can't say it clearly, even if there is, I can't express it, science is later, transforming society, Buddha is understanding society and does not have the ability to transform the world, maybe this is not in the same category, just like writers and mathematicians in different fields, Buddhists obviously exaggerate the ability of Buddha, this is the same as the creation of God, science discovered the galaxy of the universe, the origin of cells, and knew nothing before.

As for the correct view, like that example, we people here don't do this kind of thing, it's not our people who do it, it's a kind of defense of ideal purity, whether or not the person who does this thing has no absolute relationship with whether it is your person or not, so is it not the person who is not right? Any theory needs to be communicated in order to progress, and the kind of person who is regarded as the creator god as soon as it comes up, after so many years, I believe that everyone knows that it starts with people. In fact, I think Buddhism has always defended its own theories, and I don't want to say anything that is problematic about itself.

Science can explain some phenomena and has a strict logical system, although Buddhism feels that it is higher than these phenomena, but he cannot explain them, assuming that the Buddha's ability is really great, then he can't express it is also lacking in the ability to express, which means that it is not so great. People always prefer to believe in what is certain rather than the unknown. Science is the study of what is certain, and the courage to be refuted and verified.

The truth of science cannot be attained by the Buddha, the Buddha only reads the scriptures, and has not studied how the world is composed, at most he has a deep understanding and makes a substantial change, otherwise why does war break out all the time. In general, I think that Buddha and science have their own roles, that kind of Buddha is above science, science is higher than Buddha is impossible, Buddhism is still powerful, Buddha will not be passed down to the present day just by fooling, this point I respect very much. I'm also trying to read some Buddha-related books, and I feel fateful, but I don't reject science.

A humanities, a mathematical theory, sometimes some of the Buddha's ideas are very useful, many people are saying that the Buddha is powerful and omnipotent, I think the focus is wrong, the Buddha is to make you a Buddha, you are this Buddha, not to care how powerful he is.

The so-called science is the phenomenon that has been proved or realized through modern civilization, Buddhism, philosophy, phenomenon, is that modern science cannot prove or surpass for the time being...