Hurry, hurry, hurry! May I ask you, heroes, how to debate this debate competition?

There are many important things in a person's life. If you don't have a way to survive, then how can you live better? How can you pursue something else?

The establishment of a career is a guarantee for one's own life. , will not lead in case in the future if there is a problem with your feelings and overwhelmed. Starting a career can cultivate your enthusiasm, independence, and sense of responsibility, both in work and in life.

If we can't even do this, we can't do it well. So what capital do we have to think about other things? That's all we have to say.

So start a business first and then start a family.

As for the content or something.

You Baidu has it as soon as you check it.

It's overwhelming, and I don't want boring pasting.

I will use my experience of debate to speak on this subject.

Hope it helps.

The debate competition focuses on the topic stem.

You see, the focus of this topic is on a sequence.

The other party is expected to list many benefits of starting a family.

You can take a little of it from it.

The emphasis is on a question of priority, not of which is better or worse.

Secondly, in terms of sequential time, what is the establishment of a business?

How much is it to start a business?

For example, if you say that you will start a business at the age of 30, he will start a business at the age of 40.

Apparently he has an advantage, so.

In your presentation, it is best to first explain the criteria for your establishment.

Otherwise, it is easy to be caught by the other party.

30 years old and 40 years old, the definition is different, and the tendency of this debate topic is also different.

And then there is the word "karma".

I think it's necessary to have a good discussion.

At last. It's how to state that your point is right.

Don't get bogged down in one of your opponents' questions.

It is the responsibility of the first debate and the fourth debate to be steady.

You can refer to the above for your reasons or something.

Take a look at the manuscript of someone else's contest on this topic.

Look at the argument and think about how to refute it.

Looking at the opposite, those with a more stable foothold.

The two come first, and the one wants that, and it's the same

To identify the concept of "important": it does not refer to who is more basic, but who is more important. Obviously, a good eloquent humanities talent is not bad, but a good literary talent is not necessarily a good human talent.

In your life, do you deal with Wencai? If you are not a writer, the role of literary talent is not as great as that of eloquence. Grab that and play to your heart's content, and you'll be fine.

The above is my personal opinion, and the following is the material online:

Literature is the connotation of human beings.

Eloquence is the signature of a person, others see you as eloquent, the first impression is good, and it is much easier to find a job.

Literature is the foundation of eloquence.

This is indisputable, but it doesn't necessarily matter if the text is important! Pinyin is the foundation of the language, but is it important to write or pinyin?

3. In the debate competition, if the debater does not have excellent literary talents, how to be cautious before speaking.

What about thinking and overwhelming the other party with reasoned logic and powerful facts?

The other party's problems in the debate are unimaginable, you have to be eloquent to defeat the other party, and the test is improvisational eloquence, not a draft!

4 What is the use of talking all the words in vain?

But what is the use of being able to express it in words?