Is it a sick sentence for fish to swim in a pond?

This sentence is not a sick sentence, the sentence is smooth.

A sick sentence is a faulty sentence. Any sentence that violates the laws of grammatical structure or objective facts is a sick sentence, the former is called a grammatical error, and the latter is called a logical error. Grammatical errors occur more frequently.

The fish swim around in the pond, I don't think there is a problem with this sentence, it is not a sick sentence, there is a subject, there is an object, and there are adjectives It is a very normal statement, there is no problem.

Hello, this sentence still reads quite smoothly. This shouldn't be a sick sentence. This is a narrative language.

Fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence, generally speaking, it is called a sick sentence if it exceeds the subject-verb-object pattern, or is double-repeated.

This sentence is not a sick sentence. It is correct to say that the fish swims around in the pond and the fish is the subject, in the pond it is the adverbial and swims around is the verb.

The fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence, it itself means that the little fish is swimming around in the pond, carefree, so there is no problem with this sentence itself.

Personally, I think it's not a sick sentence, this sentence is normal, the fish is the subject, there are comings and goings are predicates, in the pond is an adverbial, this sentence has a subject-verb, and it is a correct sentence.

Fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence. The subject of this sentence is a fish, and the predicate is swimming around, making an adverbial in the cafeteria, and the collocation is appropriate.

This sentence is not a sick sentence, it is a very normal declarative sentence, saying that the fish swim around in the pond, describing the fish being free. It shows that they are very comfortable.

Fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence, it is a very normal natural state, there is a subject-verb-object. There are also object and character actions. This is a complete sentence.

The fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence, but the description is not beautiful enough and not meaningful enough.

The fish swim around in the pond, this sentence is not a sick sentence, it is just a very vivid description of the movement of the fish in the pond, it is a very realistic sentence.

The fish is the subject, in the pond it is the adverbial, and swimming around is the predicate. is a normal subject-verb structure. It's not a sick sentence.

The fish swims around in the pond, it is not a sick sentence, the sentence has clear components, the subject is the fish predicate, the verb is coming and going, and there is a place adverbial in the pond, which is very correct.

The fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence, this sentence is normal, but the sentence form is not complete enough to express the objective image of the fish swimming around in the pond.

The fish swimming in the pond is not a sick sentence, there is no grammatical problem, and it is also in line with people's daily expression habits, and the sentence is correct.

It's not a sick sentence, because your sentence has only one meaning, and a sick sentence generally means that he can express many meanings, and then creates ambiguity, but your sentence does not.

Fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence in my opinion, it is a very normal expression.

It's just that sometimes it may be said that the fish come and go in the water, because there is no water in the pond.

It's not a sick sentence. The fish is the subject, in the pond is the prepositional phrase, swimming around is the predicate, and there are no errors in the sentence.

It is a normal sentence for fish to swim in the pond, this is not a sick sentence, it is very correct, and the structure of the subject and predicate is very reasonable and standardized.

It is not a sick sentence for a fish to swim in the pond, because your Yue'er is the subject, and the pond is where he swims. There comes and goes, and it is a noun that modifies it, of course not.

No, the fish swim around in the pond, this sentence is true, not a sick sentence.

It should be changed to a fish swimming around in the pond, not in the pond, which means that the position of the fish is wrong, so it is also a sick sentence.

This sentence is not a sick sentence. It is very normal for a fish to swim around in the pond, and this fish is very lively and comfortable in the pond.

The fish swimming around in the pond is not a sick sentence, because the attention is that it is a fish, the location is the pond, the action is swimming around, and there is no object.

No, this is a normal sentence, unimpeded, the main expression is very clear, what is doing something, people can understand it clearly at a glance, so this sentence is not.

In real life, fish come and go in the pond, which is not a sick sentence, but a very normal sentence.

Fish swimming around in the pond, although it is not a sick sentence, but one of the words is wrong, it should be the fish swimming around in the pond, not in the pond.

This sentence is not a sick sentence, this sentence is a complete sentence, the fish is the subject, and swimming around is the predicate.

Summary. The pond is deep, so be sure to check it before entering the water. After such modifications, the sentences become more accurate and reasonable.

In the original sentence, the expression "please be sure to go into the water" was used, which was easy to mislead people into thinking that they needed to go into the water for modification. In the revised sentence, a clearer and more accurate expression is used, emphasizing the importance of confirming the depth of the water and avoiding misunderstandings and dangers.

The pond is deep, so be sure to check it before entering the water. In this way, the sentence becomes more accurate and reasonable. In the original sentence, the expression "please be sure to go into the water" was used, and it was easy for people to misunderstand and mistakenly think that they needed to go into the water for modification.

In the revised sentence, BOC uses a clearer and more accurate expression, emphasizing the importance of confirming the depth of the water and avoiding misunderstandings and dangers.

The Fragrance of Wormwood" excerpts express the author's thoughts and emotions.

The selected essays express the author's understanding and love for the customs and culture of the Dragon Boat Festival, as well as his admiration and nostalgia for poets such as Qu Yuan and Yin Yaofan. The author uses poetic language to describe the scattered scenery and atmosphere of the Dragon Boat Festival, showing a strong sense of local feelings and national pride and cherry.

**: Incomplete ingredients

Instead: (I) saw the fish emerge from the water and immediately stared intently.

** - Contrary to the facts, swallows do not fish.

Modified - Kingfisher skimmed across the water and picked up a small fish.

This sentence is a logical problem.

Swallows don't eat fish, and they don't pick up fish from the water. The modification here is to replace the swallow and the dao

Birds that skim over the surface of the water to catch fish, such as: ".The seagull skimmed over the water and picked up a small fish. "Or".The waterfowl skimmed over the surface of the water and picked up a small fish.

"And".Kingfisher ......Picked up a small fish.