I m not good at physics and history, so I m going to change it

What's up upstairs with him? The selection of texts and theories has a lot to do with it.

I suggest that the landlord choose a good one, because you don't like political history.

And politics has a lot to bear. Girls usually memorize it every day.

After memorizing it, you have to learn the replacement skills, which is more difficult, and it is important to deduct the topic.

And history and geography choose to memorize as many things (more difficult to use flexibly, will be a general 80 points to turn, 90 points in the liberal arts subject of the cow in our class).

And if you choose the wrong subject, it is easier to transfer from science to text, and it is difficult to keep up with the transfer of literature to science. I've been there until now.

I haven't heard of the transfer of texts.

Compared with science, the study of the second year of liberal arts is very boring and monotonous.

The compulsory course every day is to open the textbook + reference book back.

The knowledge of the textbook is very simple, you can understand it by reading it yourself, the key is to have patience and perseverance) Because I am not a science student, I can't express any opinions on the study of science.

The above is my experience in the second year of high school, and I hope to help the landlord.

There are also many majors to choose science majors, choose liberal arts.

I watched my dive and didn't want to come out to be a teacher, so I had to pay for it.

Don't even think about financial economy, management and the like, it doesn't matter if you come out, you can go directly to the 18th layer of hell.

Of course, the choice is in the hands of the landlord, and his life should come by himself.

Decide, who of us can't influence your decision!

PS: Remember to concentrate on the subject or specialize in the subject, and don't complain all day long, otherwise your adaptation period will be pulled by others. Far.

I think it's better to take science.

After all, there are great job opportunities after science.

If you are not good at physics, you can study hard.

Just listen carefully in class.

Not to mention that you have little interest in historical politics.

I love chemistry.

If you can't learn physics well because you're afraid.

Choose liberal arts. Every day against history and politics.

For subjects that you are not interested in.

It's really a painful thing.

Interest is the best teacher.

It is recommended that you choose liberal arts, because it is very difficult to mention it after physics is not good, and furthermore, the science and science of the college entrance examination is the subject that determines success or failure, and physics is the top priority, and chemistry and biology generally cannot pull away the score. As for choosing liberal arts, mathematics will be your dominant subject, and you can still get a high score in history and politics with a little effort. When you apply for the college entrance examination, you can choose a finance major, you can give full play to your advantages, the sky is high and the birds can fly, the sea is wide and the fish jumps, come on!

It is recommended that you choose liberal arts, physics is really important for science, don't throw away chemistry while choosing literature, it is possible to use it when looking for a job in the future, it is easy to study literature with a subject of chemistry, I don't think there is a big problem, I wish you a happy high school life.

Then choose science, chemistry is also quite interesting, physics should be studied as much as possible, science is not separated. One of the courses in chemistry at the university is Physical Chemistry.

If you lose points because you don't think clearly about the physical process given by the problem, this situation does not change in the case of a lot of problems, and, importantly, if you are still a girl, it is recommended to study the text.

If you lose points or carelessness due to unskilled application of formulas or inappropriate deduction formulas, you can consider science. Physics is the most difficult of the three subjects.

Whatever, there is not much difference in the selection of essays and theories! As long as you are not preparing to be a teacher, you can get into a good university, and what major you choose after that is more important! There are many college majors!

Thank you. To be honest, I was a little afraid to answer, after all, I am a liberal arts and science sub-major.

The person who came out, but it happened that the son of a friend of my father entered high school, and I only understood my advice after asking about it, and I just gave some of my opinions, please think rationally and choose carefully. Mathematics 90 to 120 is neither high nor low, but if this is the result of your usual hard work and hard work, then I recommend that you still not study physics.

You must know that when implementing 3+3, physics is the subject with the least number of people, precisely because it is difficult, if mathematics is already more difficult, then the time allocated between mathematics and physics may not be enough. If you usually listen to lectures, do homework, and don't feel very difficult to learn mathematics, and you are not very clear about your future major, you can choose physics. Let's talk about the benefits of choosing physics first, almost all engineering majors will require physics, even physics and chemistry, science also basically requires physics, and many majors in literature and history have no restrictions on course selection, which means that physics can give you more choices in the future.

The choice of history almost broke the idea of choosing a science and engineering major. There are also science and engineering majors with only one subject of physics and chemistry, but college chemistry also has high requirements for physics, and it will be difficult to have a high school foundation. When I was in high school, my class agreed that physics was the most difficult of the three science subjects.

But although it is difficult, as long as it is not the kind that is basically untalented, it can be improved by perseverance, and we divide the science into the physiology and metaphysics of the sciences.

Can't you come here if you have to brush the three doors? Maybe it's because I'm a science student, so I'm biased towards physics. But it is not recommended to choose physics in such categories:

One is that students who are very struggling to study mathematics and physics in the first year of high school, the more difficult it will be, and you simply don't have time to juggle two subjects that you are not good at. The second is a student with poor grades who didn't listen to much of any subject in the first year of high school, don't lie to yourself that you can do well in the exam if you study casually, I just didn't learn, even if it's true, you can't tell when you will start studying seriously, as long as you are not a genius, physics still needs a certain amount of accumulation of brushing questions. The third is to make it clear that you want to take the major in literature and history, and some people may think that there are many subjects that do not require literature and history anyway, and choose physics and then choose liberal arts, and there will be one more choice in the future.

Don't be like that, make it clear and go in your own direction, if the physical Dora.

If your time is low, the gains will outweigh the losses.

If your child is not good in physics and history, how to choose? So. This child still needs to learn some subjects that are easy to get grades through their own efforts.

It's better to choose history between physics and history. In this way, by working your own, you will be able to get more points in the exam. If I chose physics, then.

If you don't figure it out, you're losing points. Caused a lot of damage, so. It is recommended to select History.

Physics and history are not easy to choose, so choose physics, physics has calculation formulas, and history has to be memorized.

Then you have to distinguish what you think in your heart.

History is more focused on liberal arts thinking, requiring your way of thinking, thinking ability, memory, and comprehension ability, logistics requires your comprehension ability, and the ability to draw inferences from one another is strong

Compare these two subjects, choose the one you like better, if you don't like either subject, choose history, history will be more useful in later life.

Let's choose science. I think only from a learning point of view. It is difficult for you to study science well after you have studied liberal arts, but it is easy for you to take the liberal arts entrance examination after you have studied science.

Physics needs to be understood, and history can be memorized if only for the exam.

Then choose the one you like.

Interest is the best teacher, as long as you are interested, and then summarize the method, you will get good results.

Physics and history can be selected at the same time, but it is not recommended to choose both. Under the "3+1+2" college entrance examination mode, there is no possibility of choosing physics and history at the same time. Provinces that implement the "3+3" model can choose both physics and history subjects.

The number of students who choose both Physics and History subjects is relatively small, and they do not have an advantage in the assignment of points. Physics and history can be selected at the same time, but it is not recommended to choose both at the same time. Under the "3+1+2" college entrance examination mode, there is no possibility of choosing physics and history at the same time.

Provinces that implement the "3+3" blank line model can choose both physics and history subjects. The number of students who choose both Physics and History subjects is relatively small, and they do not have an advantage in the assignment of points.

Mr. Zhu Zongbin, a famous historian and professor of history at Peking University, passed away due to illness. Teacher Zhu has been teaching for more than 60 years, and has cultivated a batch of outstanding historians, which can be called a great good, but history is unpopular after all, and there are great good people like Mr. who have not pushed history to the upsurge.

After the start of the new college entrance examination, many provinces implemented the 3+1+2 subject selection system, of which 3 is in addition to the three main subjects, and this 1 is one of the two choices of physics and history, but even if history is mentioned in such an important position, it still does not change the status quo of history discipline. There were more students in physics than in history, and there were once more than 300 students in high school, and only about 30 were studying history, which is really low and unexpectedly low. So what exactly causes this phenomenon?

Do you love to study history or what?

In fact, it is not difficult for us to find that although there is no difference between choosing physics and choosing history on the surface, the score line of the first choice of physics is still much lower than the score line of the first choice of history, just like the original liberal arts and sciences, the science line is always lower than the liberal arts line, which is mainly because the difficulty of physics is there, so the score line is low. And after the new college entrance examination, all subjects have become a point system, and I won't be able to do it to others, and the score assignment has become an advantage.

Secondly, it is in terms of professional selection. Although the new college entrance examination is to allow students to determine the future direction of life development in the first year of high school, for most high school students, there are too many uncertain factors in the future.

Finally, there is the factor of history itself. Compared with physics, it will be, it won't be that it won't, the answer to history is more or less ambiguous, even if it is an objective question with different angles, it itself requires students' knowledge base, and many boys have a headache when they look at history and are stupid, but it is also because of this factor that the subjective questions of history may score even if they do not list the knowledge points, and they cannot pull the score under the premise of the point system.

Under the influence of several factors, the number of people who prefer history has plummeted, but learning history can teach you to distinguish between right and wrong, teach you to learn from the past and the present, and teach you to learn from history. It is still recommended that many students who are not very good at physics can consider the subject of history more to make the subject of history more brilliant!

At present, the new college entrance examination reform plan.

It has become imperative, and most provinces and cities have adopted a grading system. Under this system, how to choose subjects and how to assign points has become a hot topic of discussion. For example, under the "Wu Qi 3+2+1" scheme, physics and history cannot be selected at the same time, if only one can be selected, then which one is easy to score?

For another example, under the "3+3" plan, how to choose if you don't have good grades in physics and history?

1. In the "3+3" college entrance examination program.

Next, how to choose if physical history is not good?

History and physics have always been the two most difficult subjects to learn in high school, and some students happen to have good grades in both subjects, as long as we avoid these two subjects in the selection exam. Well, I suggest the following subject combinations:

1. Partial science combination: biology + chemistry + geography.

Geography is a liberal arts, but it has some characteristics of science, it is not a simple memory, and biology, chemistry and geography can choose a wide range of majors and employment in the future, and the competitive pressure is relatively small, because physics is the choice of top students.

2. Partial liberal arts combination: politics + geography + biology.

These three subjects are all a combination of liberal arts subjects, the requirements for students are not high, the only requirement is the student's memory ability, political biology memory task is large, therefore, students who are not good at memory should be cautious to apply for the exam.

2. Under the "3+2+1" college entrance examination plan, which is the best score in history or physics?

According to the statistics everywhere, physics clearly scores better than history.

1. Judging from the question types of the exam.

There are many ways to ask questions in history, and there may be a similar question, and the different ways it is asked reflect its different emphasis, so the answers will be very different, and it will not be easy to score, especially a high score. Even multiple-choice questions are the same, different people read the same question, think from different angles, and get different answers. But physics is different, its answer is fixed, how much is how much.

2. From the point of view of the scoring criteria.

As we all know, for liberal arts subjects, whether the writing is neat or not is related to your score, so there is a certain subjective factor in the evaluation of history, but the scoring standard of physics is more fixed and reasonable, and the score is given according to the steps.

3. Judging from the number of candidates in various places.

Most of the top students choose to major in physics, while those with average grades choose a liberal arts subject - history. Then the number of people who choose history will be more, the competitive pressure will be greater, and it will not be easy to open the gap, so there will be a lot of low scores.

In general, as long as students understand and master the subject selection strategy and the calculation method of the grading system, plus the number of subjects selected in various places, they can choose the right combination of subjects for themselves.