A scenic line on the Xianxia Ancient Road, the traffic artery of Zhejiang, Fujian and Jiangxi provin

Xianxia Pass in Zhejiang is located in the traffic arteries of Zhejiang, Fujian and Jiangxi provinces, and has a sense of vicissitudes of time. Because Xianxia Pass has been a battleground for soldiers since ancient times, the Jin Ge Iron Horse on the ancient road, and the blood of Xiongguan will leave traces of history.

As an ancient traffic artery, the Xianxia Ancient Road must have a sense of time vicissitudes, and when you set foot on this ancient road, you will have a fantasy of the traffic on this ancient road.

1. In a traffic accident case, the loss of the suspension of operation of the operating vehicle can be calculated based on the total loss of expenses and operating profits incurred by the vehicle on a daily basis.

2. The Reply of the Supreme People's Court on the Issue of Whether Property Losses in Traffic Accidents Include the Loss of Suspension of Operation of Damaged Vehicles stipulates that: "In a case of compensation for damage caused by a traffic accident, if the victim claims compensation for the loss of the suspension of operation during the repair period of the damaged vehicle on the grounds that the damaged vehicle is being used for cargo transportation or passenger transportation business activities, the person responsible for the traffic accident shall compensate for it."

In fact, the expected revenue from the operation of the vehicle can be calculated, and the net profit of the damaged vehicle can be determined on a daily basis based on the contract with another person or the income standard of the same industry in the location. However, it should be limited to the operation of the vehicle with operating qualifications, and the repair period should be determined with reference to the actual repair days in the repair shop and the degree of damage.

3. Calculation of the loss of the damaged vehicle from out-of-service.

Clause.

1. Whether the person responsible for the accident should be liable for compensation for operational losses.

Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 117 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China stipulate: "Anyone who damages the property of the state, the collective, or the property of others shall be restored to its original state or compensated at a discounted price. "Where the victim suffers other major losses as a result, the infringer shall also compensate for the losses.

On 29 January 1999, the Supreme People's Court's Reply on the Question of Whether Property Losses in Traffic Accidents Include Losses from Suspension of Operation of Damaged Vehicles stipulates that: "In a case of compensation for damages caused by a traffic accident, if the victim claims compensation for the loss of the suspension of operation during the repair period of the damaged vehicle on the grounds that the damaged vehicle is being used for cargo transportation or passenger transportation business activities, the person responsible for the traffic accident shall compensate for the loss of the damaged vehicle". Therefore, according to the above provisions, after the occurrence of a traffic accident, in addition to the actual property damage caused by the traffic accident, the person responsible for the accident can also claim compensation for the operating loss caused by the suspension of the vehicle.

Clause. II. Burden of Proof for Operational Losses According to the principle that the person who asserts the claim shall bear the burden of proof for the operational loss, if the victim claims the operational loss, he shall bear the burden of proof for the operational loss. First of all, the victim should provide evidence to prove whether the damaged vehicle is a commercial vehicle. In judicial practice, whether the vehicle is engaged in business activities should be subject to whether the operation procedures issued by the traffic management department shall prevail.

In many cases, because the injured party's vehicle does not have a legal operating certificate, even if there is an operation act, it is considered illegal, so the relevant claim cannot be protected by law. Second, the injured party needs to provide evidence that can prove the victim's indirect loss. In practice, it usually includes the expected benefits agreed in the freight contract and passenger transport contract, and if there is no contract, evidence of operating profit data, bills, etc. for the first six months of the injury can be provided.

If there is a contract of carriage, the loss is easier to determine, otherwise, the loss must be appraised by the price department.

It's calculated based on the average average local salary, and then multiplied by your number of days and it comes out.

If you are not satisfied with the accident certificate, you can apply for administrative reconsideration within three days of receiving it, and there is a chance that you will be re-identified.

1. The road traffic accident liability determination letter is a document formed by the public security traffic management department in accordance with traffic laws and regulations on whether the parties to the traffic accident have violated the rules, as well as the causal relationship between the violation and the damage consequences of the traffic accident. The traffic accident liability determination is a technical document with legal effect, the purpose of which is to distinguish the responsibility for the accident, to make correct and appropriate punishment of the perpetrator in accordance with traffic laws and other provisions, and to lay the foundation and provide a basis for the future treatment of accident damage compensation; It is also of great significance and role in educating the vast number of traffic participants to draw useful lessons from it, and to study the law of traffic accidents and formulate effective safety precautions.

2. Time limit for making: The traffic management department of the public security organ shall make a road traffic accident identification document within 10 days from the date of on-site investigation. In traffic hit-and-run cases, a road traffic accident certificate shall be prepared within 10 days after the vehicle and driver involved in the traffic accident are seized.

Where it is necessary to conduct an inspection or appraisal, a road traffic accident identification document shall be drafted within five days from the date on which the conclusion of the inspection or appraisal is determined. If the escape traffic accident has not yet been solved, and the injured party requests the issuance of a road traffic accident identification document, the traffic management department of the public security organ shall make a road traffic accident identification document within 10 days after receiving the written application of the party concerned and serve it on the injured party. The road traffic accident determination document shall clearly state the time and place of the accident, the circumstances of the victim and the facts obtained from the investigation, and where there is evidence to prove that the victim is at fault, the responsibility of the victim shall be determined; Where there is no evidence to prove that the victim is at fault, it is determined that the victim is not responsible.

3. Application for review: If the party concerned is dissatisfied with the traffic accident liability determination made by the traffic police, he or she may submit a written application for review to the public security traffic management department at the next higher level within 3 days from the date of delivery of the traffic accident liability determination. Within 5 days of receiving the written application for review from the parties concerned, the public security traffic management department at the next higher level will make a decision on whether to accept it.

Where the public security traffic management department accepts an application for review, if it finds that the facts of the original traffic accident responsibility determination are unclear, the evidence is not credible and sufficient, the division of responsibility is unfair, or the investigation and determination violates legal procedures, it shall make a review conclusion and order the original case-handling unit to re-investigate and determine the original traffic accident responsibility determination; If it is found that the facts of the original traffic accident liability determination are clear, the evidence is credible and sufficient, the law is correctly applied, the responsibility determination is fair, and the investigation procedures are lawful, the content of the traffic accident liability determination will be maintained. The review of the traffic accident liability determination by the public security traffic management department at the next higher level is limited to one time.

This problem depends on the specific situation, and it will not be successful under normal circumstances. Since the traffic accident recognition letter is only evidence of dealing with traffic accidents, in the people's court's trial of a traffic accident damage compensation lawsuit, it is necessary to cross-examine the evidence in court, and the party who is dissatisfied with it may explain its reasons to the court, and the people's court has the right to decide whether to accept it, and has the right to decide the proportion of liability for the accident.

Those who are dissatisfied with the determination of the responsibility of the traffic police as stipulated in the original "Measures for the Handling of Road Traffic Accidents" may apply for administrative reconsideration by the higher-level organ. Some courts also accept administrative lawsuits against them. But now, the traffic police's accident certificate is only one type of evidence in civil litigation.

In the traffic police mediation jointly applied by the parties, the determination is the natural basis; In the court's civil compensation lawsuit, the traffic police's determination is only a relatively important piece of evidence, and it is no longer the natural basis for the court to hear the case. Based on the facts proved by the parties, the court may make a judgment based on different proportions of liability. If a party is dissatisfied with the traffic accident determination, it may not apply for reconsideration.

Accident certificate no.

Within three days of receiving the copy, you can apply for an administrative reconsideration BAI and recognise it.

There is a chance of duding, but in fact, whether it is the same responsibility, or primary and secondary responsibility, you are all accompanied by each other in the case of responsibility, and the insurance company will compensate each other after assessing the damage, but basically the insurance company pays for the repair cost, so I personally feel that there is no need to be entangled in the same responsibility or primary and secondary responsibility.

There are still many successful applications for reconsideration, provided that the reconsideration is reasonable.

Article 55 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China clarifies that electric vehicles are prohibited from carrying passengers.

According to Article 55 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, motor vehicles carrying passengers shall comply with the following provisions:

1. Highway passenger cars shall not exceed the approved number of passengers, except for children who are free of charge in accordance with the regulations, and when the number of passengers is full, the number of children who are free of tickets in accordance with the regulations shall not exceed 10% of the approved number of passengers;

2. Trucks are not allowed to carry passengers. On urban roads, freight motor vehicles can carry 1 to 5 temporary workers in the compartment under the condition of leaving a safe position; When the height of the load exceeds the carriage railing, the cargo shall not carry people;

3. Minors under the age of 12 are not allowed to ride in the back seat of motorcycles, and mopeds are not allowed to carry people.

It is stupid x to propose that this is not allowed to bring people, and there are electric cars to cross the zebra crossing to push, stupid x policy.

I also can't ride my wife to work by the traffic police of Wangli Town Squadron directly detained the car, to deduct a week, pay fines and parking lot management fees to hundreds of yuan, before bandits were like this, let the workers how to live.

I am an elderly disabled person with a disability certificate, but now the tricycle is not allowed on the road, I rode a two-wheeled electric car to take my wife to the supermarket and was intercepted by the traffic police, to remember the ID number to take pictures. I don't know where this regulation was made? The mood is extremely bad, and there is no sense of gain at all!

You are not right, the traffic law does stipulate that non-mechanical power cannot carry people.

Motorcycles are motor vehicles with license plates and performance regulations that can carry people. Electric cars are flies or bed bugs, and there are many unsafe factors. It's not a motor vehicle and I love to take the motorway, and the weight and speed stipulated by the state are basically not complied with, I sympathize with your situation, but compared to personal safety, this is nothing.

When people are dead, wounded, or disabled, they don't come to complain.

Children are allowed to carry one person, and the rules for adults vary from place to place.

1. Paragraph 3 of Article 55 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "minors under the age of 12 shall not be allowed to ride in the back seat of motorcycles, and mopeds shall not carry people".

Adults driving bicycles and electric bicycles, on the premise of ensuring safety, can carry a minor under the age of 12 on urban roads, and no more than one person on other roads.

2. Article 71 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China shall comply with the following provisions for non-motor vehicles:

The regulations on bicycle carrying people shall be formulated by the people of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government according to the actual local conditions.

Electric cars don't let people, that's why.

Why do you want to design the back seat? Is it possible for a few people in a family to buy a few electric cars? Isn't the number of electric vehicles on the road on non-motorized lanes much larger?

Is it safer? Or do you have to buy a car for every family? Every time two people go out, they also drive a car?

Isn't it advocating green travel all day long? People want to go green, but they are given so many restrictions. This provision is seriously unreasonable!

We were also fined. This simply doesn't want people to live.

Treating the symptoms but not the root cause, if it is really not allowed, it will pinch off the manned design directly from the manufacturer's production; Such a stipulation cannot but make people doubt the original intention. Is it because you don't have insurance? Who said this, the traffic police will ask you if you have insurance first, and then they won't let you take someone?

What's the point, I can't carry people, I'm also suffering from it, there's no way, I can't change anything, I should be fined, if you don't let people detain the car one day, you can lose the car again, there's nothing to say.

The leaders drove four wheels, poor migrant workers with their wives who can't ride electric cars, if every family bought a car, can they walk on the road, now they are all limited, pity the poor migrant workers!!