Why houses are cheaper in third tier cities than in first tier cities

Because of their very different levels of economic development and social status, there is a large gap in the flow of people and infrastructure.

In China, high housing prices have become the norm, but the huge difference between first-tier and third-tier cities is still a bit confusing. This is actually due to the impact of the difference in economic level and social status between the two, and the gap may become wider and wider in the future.

The level of economic development in first-tier cities is much higher than that in third-tier cities, and public facilities are more complete and more attractive to people. We live in a developing country, and the four words "first-tier city" represent not only a city, but also countless opportunities and better living conditions, which are extremely attractive to countless people.

Every year, countless people pour into first-tier cities, bringing countless talents to the city, but also bringing great competitive pressure, and the continuous changes in supply and demand have also brought about the increasing rise in prices and housing prices.

Under the combined influence of various forces, housing prices in first-tier cities have shown an explosive increase, and the economic development of second- and third-tier cities is relatively weak, and the outflow of people is a norm.

First-tier cities and third-tier cities have completely different social statuses, and their influence and radiation are very different. The first-tier cities are all key areas supported by the state, and their economic development plays a role in driving the economic development of the whole region within a certain range, and their radiation influence is much higher than that of the first-tier cities.

For ordinary people, being able to establish a foothold in a first-tier city is an important manifestation of their own ability, while gaining a foothold in a third-tier city cannot prove anything. In today's society, the representative of taking root somewhere is buying a house.

The social status of the first-tier cities, where countless people come and go, also has a certain bonus impact on the mentality of residents, making them more willing to buy a house and settle down locally. As a result, the demand has never weakened, but has been growing.

In contrast, residents in third-tier cities are more willing to pursue a relatively high standard of living, and the demand for housing is not so great except for those who just need to buy a house.

In fact, there are many reasons for the large gap between housing prices in first-tier cities and third-tier cities, which depends on the impact of national policies, economic development levels, radiation capacity, personnel flow and other aspects. However, if you choose to live in a different city, you basically choose a different lifestyle.

You can decide whether you want to live in a first-tier city or a third-tier city, and that's probably the only thing you can decide.

Because third-tier cities earn ...... less wages than first-tier cities

In the past, housing prices in small cities were generally lower than those in large cities, and even in some places the housing prices were only half of those in large cities, so for local people, this ** is still a bit expensive. However, the situation is different now, and with the acceleration of urbanization and the movement of people, housing prices in smaller cities are also gradually**.

For people in small cities, there is a mismatch between housing prices and income levels, which is one of the reasons why housing prices in small cities continue to rise. Although the cost of living in small cities is relatively low, due to the small scale of the city and the lack of population mobility, the employment opportunities and development space in small cities are relatively limited, and the income level is low, which is difficult to meet the demand for housing prices. Therefore, for people in small cities, the ** of housing prices does not bring corresponding economic benefits.

In addition, the price of car tours in small cities** is also closely related to the development of the city. With the economic development and population inflow of small cities, the demand for the real estate market increases, and the market is in short supply, and the housing prices will naturally **. However, in the early stages of development, home prices in small cities tend to fluctuate before the sail, and buyers need to take greater risks due to the instability of the market in small cities.

First of all, buyers should be clear about their financial ability and housing needs, and do not blindly follow the trend and buy houses impulsively. Secondly, we should strengthen the supervision of the real estate market, regulate housing prices, and avoid speculation. At the same time, policies should also be introduced to promote the economic development of small cities, improve the income level of local people, so that the housing prices in small cities can match the economic strength of local people.

In general, housing prices in small cities are not as high as in big cities, but they are still somewhat expensive for people in small cities. Home buyers should look at housing prices rationally, do not blindly follow the trend, and should also strengthen market supervision and introduce policies to improve the economic development level of small cities and the income level of local people.

Personally, I think the main reason is that Bu is still affected by local policies and measures, and many places are keen on real estate development.

In addition, it is artificial speculation, and the so-called market ** is actually in an inflated vertical state.

Low properties are usually divided into two situations, namely swales and value swales. The former emphasizes "**", which is clear and clear, which means that a certain real estate ** is cheaper than the surrounding area; The latter emphasizes "value", we all know that value and supply and demand are the main factors affecting **, and the property that belongs to the "value depression" may currently be limited by new development and other conditions, which affects the supply and demand relationship, resulting in a low **, but in essence, it has a huge value-added space. "Value depression" properties are generally considered to have undervalued potential, while ** depressions are generally considered to have poor value-added potential.

Many of the cheaper and cheaper properties belong to the type of "depression", this kind of real estate from the beginning of the buyer's attention, the enthusiasm of the developer is not high, the planning and development of the surrounding supporting resources and the construction has been sluggish, once a similar "dead loop" is formed, **will be repeatedly**. However, as far as the overall situation of first-tier cities is concerned, due to the spillover of talents and the "halo effect" in the core areas, the possibility of ** depression will be smaller than that of second- and third-tier cities.

For the answer to this question, if you say it's worth it, you can find ten reasons why it's worth it; If you say it's not worth it, you can find ten reasons why it's not worth it.

I will only say my answer, and from the point of view of rational analysis.

If a house is not easy to get, if a house can be given to you for free, do you want to get it, and it is in a first- or second-tier city in China? There is such a good thing, for the houseless people, they can probably wake up laughing in their sleep; For those who have a house, wouldn't it be nice to have one more set! When it comes to a house, everyone wants to own it, and the more the merrier.

The problem is that the world will not drop a pie, let alone a gold pie.

Then think about it, what kind of people are behind the people who can ask this question? What are their group characteristics? I think something like this:

Most of them are young people who want to jump from the countryside to the city for one reason or another, and at the same time their financial means generally require that they do their best.

Being relatively young, eager for change, having limited financial means, having a hometown in the countryside or wanting to live separately from their parents' generation are the characteristics of the group portrait behind this group of people. They may be entangled or unwilling to buy a house.