How to debate against believing in books and not believing in books!

Believe in books, there is a wealth of knowledge in the books, and reading them can increase the level of writing.

There are many good books in the world, but is it harmful to read good books?

Books not only improve the level of writing, but also improve the imagination.

A set of squares and opposites.

Then, Fudan University had a set of books on the principles of argumentation and debating techniques and the like, which was very old and had to be bought online, two copies of about 70.

"The Ladder of Debate" is very good, and it is very detailed, and I also watched it at the beginning.

Money Debate" records the defense of Wuhan University in every competition of the National University in 01.

The two books are combined, one is theoretical, the other is practice.

English Debate Competition of a certain school and a certain department and a certain class".

I have a copy here, but it's an electronic version, which is more professional. How do I send it to you?

It's hard to say, it depends on the situation of the live debate, is it the positive side of the "positive side", or the positive side of the "negative side"? This needs to be organized on-site and adaptable.

1. Paper books can be used in any place, but electronic books can't be used.

2. From the perspective of preservation, e-books are not easy to preserve for a long time.

3. Paper books can be kept indefinitely as long as they are done properly. And e-books can't.

4. There are conditional stools for reading electronic books.

The lion opened his mouth widely, ah......Hehe.

You can go to the worry-free book network and look for it.

Reflections on Modernity is a good book.

You can go to the worry-free book network and look for it.

And "Debate Advanced" is also good.

I don't have any books that I can recommend.

When I was in college, I spoke very fast. As soon as he came to the stage, he was particularly nervous.

I really want to practice my eloquence.

I put a small pebble in my mouth and held it every day for half a year.

I've been working on my eloquence lately, too.

The first goal I set for myself was to make every word clear.

There is no way, but there is still a way to ask for it.

There is no way to do it, and it stops at the operation.

So, the content of the speech comes first.

Because of the different topics of debate and the very pertinence of the debate, there are basically no books dedicated to debate. The main thing is to focus on one's critical thinking ability and breadth of thinking. Of course, it is best to be inclusive, but it is usually to enhance your knowledge in that area as much as possible after getting the debate topic, and at the same time combine your knowledge accumulation in various fields, which requires the usual accumulation, the so-called accumulation.

Usually the improvement of personal ability, as long as it is a good book, you can read it, it doesn't matter the field. More targeted are books on logic, psychology and marketing. Marxist materialism is not bad either.

Principles of Economics

Gregory Mankiw (author) Liang Xiaomin (Chinese translation) Fourth edition Peking University Press.

Thomson Original.

Economics, Paul Samuelson, People's Posts and Telecommunications Publishing House, 2008 (18th Edition), Introduction to Logic (Recommended).

Keppi and Cohen, Chinese Renmin University Press.

History of Western Philosophy (recommended).

Bertrand, Russell, Ho Zhaowu, Joseph Needham (trans.), Introduction to the History of Chinese Culture

Qian Mu Commercial Press.

The Door of the Law (recommended).

Bogasino. I'm on the debate team, so if there's anything else you can do to help, please feel free to come to me

If you want to argue that you should quit, then you must hold on to the little tail and give you a few suggestions, the times are progressing and moving forward, and new things are replaced.

The Right to Old Things Is Inevitable Although Lu Xun's spirit should last forever, it should not be allowed to become the apex, which will be detrimental to the progress of ideology and culture If we want to retain the traditional classics, then we should not keep the traditional classics that existed thousands of years ago"Preserve the principles of heaven and destroy people's desires"What's the difference? I hope it helps.

Mr. Lu Xun should not copy the textbook! His works have profound significance for us, for the country, and for the nation! He criticized the darkness of the times because he was patriotic!

Because he is not numb! Because the times call him! His works can give us a clear mind and let us understand the darkness of an era!

Forgetting history means betraying judgment! He just responded to the needs of the times! Why criticize him like this!

Parents think that his works allow students to look at problems from a negative side, but as everyone knows, it is precisely parents who make students negative! Parents complain about wages, complain about traffic jams, complain about low productivity, complain about corruption, and invisibly affect others but blame everything on Mr. Lu Xun - the great Mr. Lu Xun!

Lu Xun should not withdraw from the textbook.