The man transferred 230,000 yuan to his girlfriend 63 times to get it back and was rejected, does th

There are no rights. Because this is an act of gift, he has no right to get it back.

There is no right to get it back, because in the process of falling in love, this is an economic act of automatic gifting, so it does not involve breaking the law. So the money won't come back.

I think there's definitely the right to come back, and if the woman doesn't, she has the option to sue.

The husband had no right to get the money back, as he had no evidence that the money had been lent. When the court heard the case, it found that the 230,000 yuan was not transferred to the other party in one lump sum, but was divided into 63 transfers in two years. The normal borrowing frequency simply cannot be so high, which is obviously inconsistent with private lending, so in the end, the court did not support the man's claim.

The specifics of this matter.

Mr. Lei and Ms. Tian have been in love for two years, during which Mr. Lei transferred a lot of money to his girlfriend in order to make him happy. Later, the two chose to break up due to a conflict, and Mr. Lei felt that Ms. Tian should return all the expenses and provided all the transfer records. Mr. Lei said that because he was in a passionate relationship with his ex-girlfriend at the time, he was embarrassed to let Ms. Tian borrow money to the other party.

Ms. Tian was naturally reluctant to return it, saying that the money was a common living expense of both parties, and also provided the court with chat records.

In this case, the lawyer believes that there should be two types of transfers during a relationship, and if one party voluntarily gives money to the other party in order to win favor during the relationship, the act should be recognized as a gift. What is given out, no matter how the relationship between the two develops, there is no right to get it back. Another situation is to constitute a private lending relationship, because there are many young couples, they will not consider any legal issues when they are in love, so they spend the money on each other in a daze, and do not take the initiative to ask for an IOU, and finally cannot prove that the money is a loan.

Therefore, young people are reminded to be rational when they fall in love, no matter whether they can go to the end with each other or not, and do not blindly spend a lot of money on each other before establishing a relationship between husband and wife. If the other party asks you for money, be sure to write an IOU at this time. Trust the subject to understand and will not care about these issues.

And you can see the face of the object clearly through this matter, every relationship will inevitably involve money issues, and only when it is clear at all times can personal rights and interests be protected.

Judging from the rejection of the 230,000 transfer to his girlfriend after the man in Shunyi District broke up, even if the man wants to recover it, I think it is understandable. After all, 230,000 yuan is not a small amount, but the income of many families for one or two years, so after two people are separated, the man can make this request to the woman, but this behavior may not be supported, or even disliked by others.

1. Consultation

For this kind of thing, the most important thing depends on whether the woman is willing, after all, this is a matter between two people, even if we want the woman to return, we should show our own attitude and communicate patiently, so as not to be rejected by the woman. Therefore, in the process of falling in love, we don't necessarily have to meet the girl's requirements with materials, but we should try to be fair, so that even after two people are separated, there will be no conflicts because of these trivial matters.

2. Courts

The moment the two people walked to the court, it meant that this matter could no longer be coordinated with the air businessmen, and could only be tried through the court. However, the two of them had their own claims, and they did not meet the loan relationship, so they could not produce evidence to prove it, so the court finally rejected Mr. Lei's claim. After all, in the process of transferring money in the past, there was no talk of these sensitive blocking words, and the woman also stated that the expenses were the living expenses of the two people, and also provided some chat records, so it was not in line with the private lending situation in a short distance, and it was difficult to get the money back unless Mr. Lei could come up with sufficient evidence.

Therefore, in the process of falling in love, we should still keep a rational mind, even if it is developing for the purpose of marriage, we still have to keep an eye on it, at least in terms of economy, we still have to distinguish clearly, and wait for two people to get married and then mix together, which can also reduce a lot of unnecessary troubles, and even quarrels between two people.

Of course, this kind of behavior will not be supported, because it is a kind of mutual giving between two people, and I can't legally define it or borrow or something like that.

It is legally upheld, as it is not a voluntary gift.

What did you transfer this money for when you first transferred it, it won't be a gift from you, then this money should be returned to you, if he is not in love for the purpose of fraud, he will not pay you back.