What kind of character is Nan Huaijin? Why is his review mixed?

Mr. Nan is not only committed to the education of Chinese culture, but also to the development and construction of the motherland. He said that he hopes to use the research and dissemination of cognitive science, life sciences and traditional culture to save the spiritual crisis that people are facing in this era. The controversy surrounding him and his works has never stopped, and the detractors denounced it as nothing more than a "Jianghu **" and "tampering with the three religions to confuse the ancient and the modern".

Nan Huaijin is a generation of masters of Chinese studies, and his attainments in philosophy and religion are quite good, leaving many classic books and records; As for the mixed evaluations of him, those are the objective personal views of some people, and they don't know him very well! Nanshi's contribution is very important in the history of Chinese philosophy.

The book written is very worth reading, I have been reading it for a long time, well, there is a receipt!

Nan Huaijin can be called a "strange person" in terms of culture, but he is not academic, and Nan Huaijin's remarks often make people feel absurd, not like a serious scholar.

One day in 2007, a primary school student asked Nan Huaijin if he had published a book called "Listening to Nan Huaijin Speak on the Analects", but Nan Huaijin had not published this book in Guangming ** Publishing House, and the authors of the book, Zhang Baowen and Xu Qingyuan, had not come to Taihu University Hall to listen to their own lectures, but there were many assertions in the book that "Nan Huaijin thinks" and "Nan Huaijin says".

In 2009, Xu Yong submitted an indictment to the Shijingshan District and Chaoyang District People's Courts in Beijing, first suing Xinhua Publishing House, Petroleum Industry Publishing House, and China Yanshi Publishing House, arguing that these three publishing houses used Nan Huaijin's ** as the cover of the book without Nan Huaijin's permission, and requested the court to order the three publishing houses to immediately stop the infringement of portrait rights, apologize and compensate for losses.

Subsequently, the Beijing Municipal High People's Court studied and decided to merge the two cases filed by Nan Huaijin in the Chaoyang District People's Court into the Shijingshan District People's Court for pretrial mediation. But Nan Huaijin and the three publishers failed to mediate because they could not agree on the amount of compensation.

In late May 2010, Xu Yong submitted another complaint to the Dongcheng, Xicheng and Chaoyang courts. The lawsuit involved seven books from nearly 10 publishing houses, and brought a lawsuit over the right to name and reputation. But Xu Yong still has not received the result of filing the case.

Teacher Nan Huaijin has made immortal efforts for the revival of Chinese culture.

Who can understand the teacher's game intentions.

Nan Huaijin is a contemporary Chinese writer, educator, disseminator of Chinese orthodox culture, scholar, poet, martial artist, and master of Chinese culture. He has served as a professor at National Chengchi University, Fu Jen University and Chinese Culture University. Born in Yueqing, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

After the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, Nan Huaijin moved to Taiwan with the Kuomintang, and was invited to give lectures at many universities, institutions and social organizations in Taiwan. On September 19, 2012, ** broke the news that Nan Huaijin was critically ill. At 4 p.m. on September 29, Nan Huaijin passed away at the age of 95 in Suzhou Taihu University Hall.

During his lifetime, Nan Huaijin wrote mostly speeches, and was proficient in various classics such as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism, and devoted himself to the construction and dissemination of Chinese orthodox culture.

Nan Huaijin mainly studies two fields: one is Chinese studies and the other is Buddhism. I don't study Chinese studies, so I don't know very well.

But in the field of Buddhism, Nan is Buddhism**.

According to one or two Hinayana scriptures, unscrupulously slandering Mahayana Buddhism, or sitting in a well and looking at the heavens, ignoring the immeasurable realm of Buddhism and slandering the Vajra Tantra, or ignorant of the two truths, not knowing the two meanings, and looking forward to the profound and profound Prajna Dharma, or judging the Dharma from a secular point of view, thinking that it is the true Dharma to its taste, and thinking that it is the false Dharma if it does not suit its taste, the more such a study, the more confused it becomes, and the more wrong it is, the reason for this kind of problem is that it is full of evil spirits and arrogance. I look down on the research results of the Buddhist masters of the past and want to be unique." Venerable Shi Beihui wrote a book: "The Bodhisattva in My Heart Wishes to Walk the Gate", which says on page 251:

Mr. Nan Huaijin misunderstood, the difference was 108,000 miles, he made a big joke, and even the basic beliefs of a Buddhist student were wrong

The deepest impression is the "Three Graves, Five Classics, Eight Suo and Nine Hills" in Zuo Chuan, he even told me that he refers to the Four Books and Five Classics, and I am also drunk, so I want to ask Zuo Chuan when the book was written, and when did the Four Books and Five Classics exist.

Nan Huaijin said: "Today's world, on the surface, can be said to be the happiest era in history; But on a spiritual level, it can also be said to be the most painful era in history. Under the sharp contrast between the development of material civilization and the poverty of spiritual life, mankind is facing a new crisis.

He said that he founded Taihu University in the hope of using the research and dissemination of cognitive science, life sciences and traditional culture to redeem the spiritual crisis that people are facing in this era.

Because some people revered him as a master of Chinese studies, some people thought he was a liar.

Duko! Ignorant people are fooled by those who are flying and impetuous, and they see it through.

The people of the dao will naturally call this fool **! He didn't even touch the side of the Dharma that was born, and he didn't even bother to say that. It is the Confucian doctrine of accession to the WTO, and his interpretation is full of bruises and bowing his head.

People who have a little logic and know a little common sense can see that Nan is an extremely unreliable **. There are high and low opinions, right and wrong, and that's not a problem. His problem is much, much, much more serious than that!

Nan Huaijin mainly studies two fields: one is.

One is Buddhism.

I don't want to study Chinese culture. Research, not very clear.

But in the field of Buddhism, Nan is Buddhism**.

The 6th reincarnated living Buddha of the Gelug sect, Dorchi Rinpoche, wrote a book called: The Three Jewels and the Law of Refuge in Popular Explanations.

Among them, "Mr. Nan Huaijin" was named and evaluated, and the specific content is as follows:

According to one or two Hinayana scriptures, unscrupulously slandering Mahayana Buddhism, or sitting in a well and looking at the heavens, ignoring the immeasurable realm of Buddhism and slandering the Vajra Tantra, or ignorant of the two truths, not knowing the two meanings, and looking forward to the profound and profound Prajna Dharma, or judging the Dharma from a secular point of view, thinking that it is the true Dharma to its taste, and thinking that it is the false Dharma if it does not suit its taste, the more such a study, the more confused it becomes, and the more wrong it is, the reason for this kind of problem is that it is full of evil spirits and arrogance. I look down on the research results of the Buddhist masters of the past and want to be unique."

Venerable Shi Beihui wrote a book: "The Bodhisattva in My Heart Wishes to Walk the Gate", which says on page 251:

Mr. Nan Huaijin misunderstood, the difference was 108,000 miles, he made a big joke, and even the basic beliefs of a Buddhist student were wrong

This is a very natural thing, some people doubt the Buddha and some people believe in the Buddha, some people learn the Tao and some people doubt the Tao, it can't be said to be **. There is a saying that is so good that different people don't conspire with each other.

There is nothing in the world that will be liked and recognized by everyone! There are reasons for reverence for the revered, and there are reasons for the degraded! The Tao is different, let them go!

Nan Huaijin has a certain amount of research on Chinese studies, but it is not thorough, and he is not a master, at most he is a scholar.

Of course Nan Huaijin counts, in addition, Yu Dan's nickname is "Spiritual Godmother", although she is not a master, but I am very optimistic about her. o(∩_o

Because these books are all dictated, he is giving a guide from the perspective of his own practice, and this guidance is not suitable for everyone. Therefore, many quotes from Nanshi are quoted to prove him wrong.

Because of the countless people who opposed him, many of them became his students, and they also regretted that they had misunderstood Nanshi.

He is indeed the most effective instructor of modern Buddhism, and how can other monks give proper guidance to lay people who are mainly based on the worldly Dharma.

There is no one worthy of this title in modern times.