Creation theory or evolution theory , which one do you agree with more and why?

The theory of evolution as a scientific study has now developed into a huge discipline. And the so-called"Creation said"It's just a statement that doesn't have any theoretical support, and different countries, different nationalities, and different races have different theories about the creation of man. On the one hand, there is a lot of science supported by theories and facts, and on the other hand, there is no reason to say that I would definitely agree with the theory of evolution.

Admittedly, there are some unsolved mysteries about evolution, but at least so far, evolution has been able to explain many phenomena, and even more, humans are now using it. In the selection of animals and plants, the principle is the theory of evolution. Therefore, some problems that are difficult or unexplainable by the theory of evolution may be explained by some future excavations and theories.

The "theory of evolution" is based on actual observation and scientific research, and the "theory of the creation of man" is based on the fact that the brain has no factual basis, which do you think should be believed? It should be said that there is no doubt that you should believe in the theory of evolution, do not talk about things with a lot of personal feelings, and if you think you can disprove it, come up with enough evidence to publish it in an internationally renowned journal.

There are still many "mistakes" in the evolution theory of Darwin's time, because the technology of that era was not enough, and it was not possible to study the inner (molecular level) of living things in detail and in depth, and could only rely on fossils and the structural characteristics of living things to make some speculations. In modern times, genetic studies have found a wealth of evidence to support evolutionary views, including the question of the origin of humans.

There is no evidence for the creation of man, "How can it be that human beings have such a high IQ, how can it be that apes evolved"...It's more speculation, and since you want to argue that man was created by a higher species, you have to come up with a basis around this view, not just talk about it. At present, some people still criticize the theory of evolution with some inaccurate views of Darwinian evolution, but the modern theory of biological evolution is relatively mature, and no longer has any biologists questioned it, and there is no such thing as "abolished abroad, but the truth at home".

I agree with the theory of evolution because the creation of man is a myth and legend. There is no scientific basis. It's a false thing.

I believe in the theory of evolution because it has been confirmed, and it can be seen from Darwin's research.

I'm more inclined to evolution. In my opinion, the creation of man is completely mythical, and human beings should continue to evolve in nature.

Before that, many people believed that the theory of evolution was completely wrong, that the cells of living organisms were too precise and complex, which could not be achieved through random evolution. But human beings, through social development and the evolution of a series of evidences, have confirmed that human development, or material development, has a certain significance.

It can take a long time to go from zero to leap, but to be accurate, it doesn't take long. For example, computers, human civilization has long discovered the principle of computing since the day of its formation, but soon after the discovery of the basis of computing, various means of calculation appeared, and soon after the discovery of electricity, electronic computers were invented. If we introduce the evolution of computers at a stage when the principles of computing have not yet been opened, of course, it is unimaginable and unimaginable that the machine is so accurate, and this is also the slow evolution of l!

<> you should look through any book and note that any treatise on the history of science, whether Chinese or poorly written by a foreigner, and if it is, it is written by historians and Orthodox scholars, it must be about Darwin and his theory of evolution. In addition, there is no historical scientific literature that questions the theory of evolution as a scientific theory. If you find anything to the contrary, be sure to let me know.

But modern evolution, in particular, is no longer synonymous with Darwinian evolution, but is still pulsating.

The theory of evolution is currently the most in line with the scientific theory, if a group of children who have lived in a large closed environment since childhood, without education, what will they do to grow up? For example, a group of children who have lived in a large space since childhood, just by teaching them the knowledge of the first grade, you can extrapolate the level from the second grade to the university, when they live in nature in different places in the same environment as adults, you can see people living in different environments, they adapt to life in nature, due to its creation, the material level of life is uneven, and it is also proved that different living conditions can change the different creative abilities of human beings, that is, in different life spaces, The evolution of human beings takes place in constant progress, with new and acquired genes evolving from generation to generation and passing them on to the next generation.

The first to propose the idea of evolution was the French biologist Lamarck (1744-1829). In 1809, in his book "Philosophy of Animals", he mentioned that due to the continuous changes in the living environment, living things change accordingly according to the laws of "use in and in and out of use" and "acquired inheritance". Lamarck clearly proposed the law of evolution of animals from simple to complex, from low to high.

In 1830, the British geologist Lyle (1797-1875) explained in his book "Principles of Geology" that the geology is constantly changing under the action of natural forces, and the current crustal structure is the result of evolution. It shows that the abiotic world is also gradually evolving. The founder of the theory of biological evolution was Charles Darwin (1809-1882) in England.

Britain in the middle of the 19th century was in a period of great capitalist development. The cultivation of plant and animal breeds, paleontology, zoogeography, plant geography, morphology, embryology, and comparative anatomy all made great progress, preparing the conditions for the creation of Darwin's theory of evolution. In 1831, Darwin went on a five-year expedition around the world as a naturalist.

A large number of animal and plant specimens were collected from the sea surface of South America. In November 1859, his famous book The Origin of Species was published. He used a large number of facts to show that the biological world is often in the process of change, and that the formation of new species and the extinction of old ones are the result of historical development; Organisms are constantly mutating, the fittest survive, and vice versa.

The gradual accumulation of variation that favors the survival of species leads to the creation of new species. The book "On the Origin of Species" shook the world. Because of its irrefutable arguments, the theory of evolution quickly gained acceptance in the scientific community.

The founding of the theory of evolution for the first time made a scientific and regular explanation of the historical development of the biological world, thus overthrowing the long-term domination of metaphysical and religious idealism such as species immutability, teleology and creationism.