Is evolution just a theory Is evolution a false theory?

No, Darwin only focused on the evolution of species, but did not focus on the question of origin and did not explain the existence of complex organizations. Species have a point that suddenly erupts, and the only explanation is that the species God created it. The universe is big ** just speculation.

And, you can study the flagella of bacteria, the pelvic bones of whales, gluons, the six basic concepts of evolution, the keel of humans, the existence of complex tissues, .........You can find that none of this can be explained by atheistic evolution or atheistic science, and most of it is just speculation and convention.

Ever heard of Cambrian Life Great**? That's an ironclad fact! Fossil research reports in Chengjiang, China indicate that no fossils can be found before the Cambrian!

But in the Cambrian period hundreds of millions of years ago, 54 basic biological phyla suddenly appeared! And in the Cambrian straight line, there is no trace of evolution to be found! This discovery proves that we did not evolve from a single cell!

According to paleontoarchaeological research, it has been found that all known species on the earth appear suddenly, and there is no trace of evolution at all! So, man didn't evolve at all!

There is an archaeological basis for the evolution of human beings.

The evolution of species is theoretical and theoretical.

Below us, there is another layer of life that creates us and underpins all our actions. We are like their houses, their cars, they provide them with some kind of need, they will constantly transform us, but the journey is very long, of course we are not on the same time scale as them, and the process may be very fast for them. We were created to meet their needs, and if one day they had a better "house structure" or "transportation" or something like that, we would be redundant.

First of all, in response to the problem, Darwin's "Theory of Evolution" in the current era, a lot of evidence can prove that this theory is wrong, but it is not absolutely wrong, the so-called correct, that is, many of the things mentioned in Darwin's "Theory of Evolution" are objective facts reflected in reality, but because Darwin was a pioneer, there was not even Mendel's theory in that era, and some errors are normal because many things have not yet been perfected, just like in physics Aristotle proposed that "force is the cause of maintaining the motion of objects" Overthrown by Newton.

And then let's talk about the theory of evolution (the rest of the part is something other than the problem.,By the way, dis the "blank mountain man" in the area.,The reason is because his comments are not only very amateurish but also extremely negative.,Personally, I think this kind of misleading comments should be deleted.,By the way,If you're really interested in some scientific issues, you can go to Zhihu and search for it.,There are a lot of professionals in Zhihu.,And I'm just a scum.。 The theory of evolution can be traced back to ancient Greece, and the beginning of the real system was in the hands of Lamarck, Darwin, and Wallace, and the theory of evolution is not a thing of the Darwinian family, every theory has been polished by time, and the theory of evolution mentioned by Cash includes the theories of Kimura Shisei, Mendel, and evolutionary biology in the post-genome era born with the help of modern technology, which is a complex thing that is difficult for ordinary people to explain clearly. Objection to Darwin's statement is nothing more than that evolution is not continuous, but existential; Neutral evolution, variation, but not good or bad, etc., these can be listed as deficiencies of Darwinian evolution in my personal opinion, and can be regarded as supplements.

There is also the following user, "(1) Organisms are composed of proteins and DNA and other substances, and DNA is needed to synthesize proteins, and DNA polymerase (a protein) is needed to synthesize DNA. This question doesn't really prove evolution wrong, because it's not a problem in itself, why? Because RNA can be used as both a genetic material and a catalyst, performing the same function as proteins, and as far as I know, this has been scientifically proven.

Let's just say so much, after all, I'm also a rookie, and if I talk too much, my cultural level will be exposed.