There are also poor people in developed countries, do you know what the poor are like there?

We all know the United States as a superpower.

Really developed countries.

The living conditions of the people there have always been very curious, and many people will have a question, the United States is so developed, so is there any poor people in the United States? Or what are the poor people in America like? Is it really very poor?

How does it compare with China? Let's go one by one.

First of all, as most countries in the world, there are poor people, after all, when the country is big and the population is large, the poor will definitely be born, just like developed countries such as Russia and Germany, there will still be poor people, but different countries treat the welfare and attitude of the poor differently. So what are the poor in the United States like? It is understood that most of the poor people in the United States are poor families who cannot afford to go to school, because many jobs in the United States require a college diploma, so most of those who cannot afford to go to school can not find a job, or can only do some simple work, or even sell coolies, etc., in addition, many of the poor in the United States are family-oriented, that is to say, the whole family is relatively poor, so these people are really very poor?

In fact, the United States has long had a calculation standard for the poor, and a family of four with an annual income of less than 10,000 US dollars can be defined as a poor household.

If the combined income of the couple is less than 10,000 US dollars, it can also be defined as a poor household, and it is understood that there are now more than 46 million poor households in the United States, accounting for about one-sixth of the total population of the United States. Of course, the United States**.

There are also many policies to help the poor, such as food subsidies, house purchase discounts, etc., as long as the poor meet the conditions can apply, so the poor in the United States will not live too miserably, and their usual life can still be guaranteed. But if compared to other less backward countries, where the poor are largely unsubsidized and can only live in rags on their own, such as some countries in Africa.

After reading it, I really admire the United States, the United States and China are indeed better than China in terms of the treatment of the poor, after all, they will not go hungry, and they do not have to worry about food and clothing. Most of the poor people in many impoverished areas of China live in rural areas, and their families usually have little income, so they can only rely on farming for a living, and sometimes they can't afford to eat.

Although China also has a lot of poverty alleviation policies, it will take time to lift all of China's nearly 70 million poor households out of poverty. In addition, although China now has medical insurance, but it is not completely free, sometimes only a part of the reimbursement can be made, if the medical insurance is free, then I believe that the problem of poor people difficult to see a doctor can be completely solved.

In the end, the principal believes that the poor in the United States can still live a good life, after all, they can enjoy the corresponding subsidies, so the basic living problems can be solved, in China, someone once said that if you have a monthly salary of 5000, it has surpassed most Chinese, although it is just a joke, but it also shows from the side that the per capita income of Chinese is not high enough, and we must continue to work hard, and the principal also believes that China will develop better in the future!

The lives of the poor in developed countries are basically similar to ours, and the lives of the people there seem to be more difficult, the wages are not high, the prices are relatively high, and the income is not proportional to the returns.

In fact, in many developed countries, the poor really can't even eat, and those poor people really don't live as well as the beggars in our country, and it is painful for them to live.

In fact, the poor people in those developed countries live in great poverty, and they don't even have a decent place to live, and it is not easy to even eat a full meal.

People in developed countries are generally wealthy, mainly because these countries have highly developed economic systems and advanced levels of productivity. These countries have advanced technology and high-quality education systems, which can produce high-quality talents and promote rapid economic development.

In addition, developed countries also have a sound social security system and a good legal environment, which guarantee the people's basic rights and interests and property security. A series of measures have also been taken to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship, attract foreign investment and promote international investment, further promoting economic development and wealth accumulation.

In addition, people in developed countries generally enjoy high income, high welfare, and a high standard of living, which is one of the reasons why they are relatively wealthy. They can enjoy high-quality public services such as medical care, education, housing, and transportation, while also having more consumption choices and higher spending power.

Small populations are also a factor in the relative wealth of developed countries. With less population and relatively more resources and wealth per capita, everyone can have more property and income. In addition, a small population also means that the labor market is more flexible and wages are relatively high, which also helps to improve people's spending power and living standards.

In addition, due to the small population, the country can more easily implement macroeconomic policies, such as fiscal policy, monetary policy, etc., to promote economic development and increase national wealth. At the same time, due to the smaller size of the country, the management efficiency in various fields is also higher, allowing for more efficient use of resources and increased production efficiency.

In short, the wealth of people in developed countries is the result of the combined effect of economic, social, cultural, demographic and other factors.

1: The first pot of gold of European and American imperialism came from the war reparations of the agricultural country "China", 2: the second pot of gold came from the windfall profits brought by the industrial revolution, 3:

The third gold is from the defeated country of the Second World War Germany, the scientist who brought the rapid development of anti-slip technology to Britain and the United States and created huge wealth, and these three grandsons brought wealth to the capitalist countries! Why did in the 90s there was a recession in all countries, the most serious being the United Kingdom, France, the United States, why the recession? Here's why:

First, the low fertility rate, and second, the lack of attention to industrial production, but the financial industry, which is quick to make money, has caused a large number of industrial products to move to Asia, which has increased the domestic unemployment rate.

Three: the high welfare of the whole people makes the people do not love labor and pursue enjoyment, and the wages are high!

It takes a couple of things. First and foremost is an intelligent and educated population. A country's potential is defined by the level of intelligence and education of its population, which is the same as the potential of individuals.

Then there is the free market economy with extremely low corruption and crime. Transparent and honest legal system. Legal protection of private property.

An investment- and import-friendly country with real competition in the market. A tax system that encourages and rewards entrepreneurship and honest work and puts these in place, and a country will do well.

In other words, the capitalist system has an honest **fair tax system (ideally a flat tax), taxes that encourage foreign investment, and smart people who value education and hard work and see it pay off. One aspect of social sockism that I would like to propose is the free education system that includes universities, but focuses on STEM, business and finance disciplines, and free technical colleges and ** schools. Humanities subjects that do not have the value of economic support should not be funded.

Priority should also be given to investing in infrastructure projects such as railways, roads, educational institutions, and telecommunications. It is also important to have a sound monetary policy that creates a low-inflation environment, so that there are no large deficits. Currencies must be credible and stable in order to create an environment in which people can save and invest.

Depends on how motivated the citizens of the country are.

Every country usually has a choice, to always progress or struggle, and unfortunately most people prefer the latter.

Leadership is the most important factor in a country's success. Poor leadership has left most African countries in a difficult situation.

Interestingly, a lot of citizens complain that they have brought in their leaders from foreign countries or outer space, greed is always the problem, there is a community that encourages greed, the country is always poor.

I believe that ** is usually a reflection of the citizens who make it up. If it is corrupt, then most citizens are also corrupt or encourage such behavior.

Poor countries can easily start to become rich:

A market economy is practiced, and the degree of corruption is low.

Open to international** and investment.

Stop all the money handkerchiefs. Have a floating currency with low or no inflation.

It's as easy as that. It's that hard.

Most poor countries can't do what I listed above.

But Chile did. Ireland did it. China is also doing well. Ireland is rich now. Chile and China are also getting rich fast enough.

Why don't most poor countries do what I've listed? Local politics and culture, local beliefs and traditions, and a limited awareness of what might happen. Every poor country is poor for strong personal reasons.

According to the statistics bureau, it is estimated that in 2013, the number of people in China with a per capita net income of less than 1,000 yuan exceeded 100 million.

This does not mean that there are 100 million workers earning less than 1,000 yuan a month, because it includes non-income members of the corresponding families (such as the elderly and minors), and many rural workers do not work outside the home all year round, so this is not contradictory to the common monthly salary of 2,000 or 3,000 yuan.

Extreme poverty, last year's data are not yet available, earlier data are:

In 2011, according to the World Bank, the proportion of people living on less than US dollars a day was 100 million.

In 2013, according to China's **** standard, the per capita net income of rural residents was less than 2,300 yuan, and the total number of poor people was 82.49 million, with a poverty incidence rate.

The Chinese population base is large, relatively speaking, there are still quite a few.

In so many countries in the world, some countries are quite rich, while others are really too poor, and in some places even food is a problem, and the gap between the rich and the poor is quite obvious. So which countries in the world are particularly poor? Let me briefly list a few.

1.Ethiopia

Ethiopia ranks first among the poorest countries with a per capita wealth of only $1,965, and Switzerland ranks first with a per capita wealth of $648241, a difference of nearly 330 times. Moreover, there is still a gap between the rich and the poor in the country, some people have more wealth, while others have problems eating.

2.Eritrea

Copper and gold are available here, but 80 percent of the locals are farmers, and only 70 percent of the people can read and write. The country is close to the Red Sea and borders Ethiopia and Sudan. At the same time, the peasants here suffered from a prolonged drought and a lack of labor - because many were induced into military service.

With a GDP per capita of only $777, it's easy to see why Eritrea is one of the poorest countries in the world.

3.Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe is a landlocked country and ranks third poorest in the world. The per capita GDP of the PPP is only $516. Zimbabwe is typically rich in natural African resources, but due to years of war and non-production policies, the turbulent country remains a predominantly agricultural economy.

As a result of successive droughts, Zimbabwe has suffered repeated setbacks in its food self-sufficiency. While economic development can be achieved through the extraction of diamonds, coal, copper and gold, the country's fiscal revenues are still dominated by tobacco and crops.

In addition to the above three, there are more than forty of the poorest countries in the world, most of which are in Africa. For example, Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guyana and many other countries.

The causes of poverty can be divided into two parts: colonial and agrarian-based modes of production, with little to no scientific development. Scientific development is important if poverty is to be lifted.

In general, poverty cannot be changed by one of us, and it takes everyone to work together to get rich together.

Zimbabwe, because of the country's very high inflation, has made this country the poorest country in the world. According to big data, Zimbabwe's per capita GDP is only 100 US dollars, which is equivalent to 600 yuan, and you can imagine how low the purchasing power of people in this country is.

Africa is one of the poorest countries.

In Africa, because the state does not invest enough in education and does not have the infrastructure to live in, they have only needed to eat for generations.

Burma and some parts of Africa are poor. These countries are poor because there are political wars within the country and wars that occur frequently. Many struggles have further hampered the country's development.

India and Vietnam, as well as Nepal, are very poor because they are economically underdeveloped, there are often civil wars, and the quality of their citizens is not high.

There are these particularly poor countries in the world, such as India, Africa, Vietnam, these countries are relatively poor.