How did the U.S. sanction China during the Korean War?

Updated on international 2024-07-20
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    At that time, the United States imposed the strictest sanctions on us with a material embargo, accompanied by a strict ban on transactions.

    Later bans, such as those in Iraq and Iran, will at least because of humanitarian concerns, and will appropriately leave some of the gaps in transactions to avoid a humanitarian crisis caused by the shortage of food and medicines for a large number of ordinary people in their countries. At that time, the attitude towards China was to prohibit all material exchanges between its camp and the country, so strict that even some foreign companies should accidentally purchase low-grade raw materials such as duck feathers, and they may be subject to criminal charges.

    So you can learn about the feat of Huo Yingdong smuggling drugs into China at that time, and the status given to him by the later countries.

    Such sanctions continued until around the time of the establishment of diplomatic relations, but after the end of the Korean War, the controls were not so strict. There were many other factors that affected the lack of normal communication channels between the two countries, and it was not until long-term mediation and matchmaking through intermediaries such as Pakistan that normal communication channels were slowly and gradually restored in the form of ping-pong diplomacy.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    At that time, there was only real war, no sanctionsSanctions have gradually become one of the main forms of suppression in international governance after the United States has achieved global hegemony.

    At that time, sanctions were useless, at that time the two countries were completely decoupled, and exchanges between China and the West were at an all-time low.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    When you talk about U.S. sanctions against South Korea, you should be referring to the recent U.S. anti-dumping tariffs on South Korea. In fact, this is not sanctioning South Korea at all, it is just some good people taking the news out of context in order to attract attention.

    The U.S. imposes anti-dumping duties of up to 61 percent on South Korean steel products, but the anti-dumping duties imposed by the U.S. on China earlier this year were more than a terrifying 500 percent. These things are reported in the news, but some people choose to ignore them.

    Anti-dumping controls in the United States and European countries have a long history, and the levy does not say anything. On this point, the questioner can encyclopedia of "market economy status", which is what China lacks now.

    Therefore, the current move of the United States is not to sanction South Korea, perhaps because the G20 meeting is to be held, so it symbolically carries out anti-dumping against South Korea to ease Sino-US relations, but if it is to be said to be sanctions, then hehe.

    Finally, there is the relationship between China and South Korea, so to speak, as long as the United States is still there, then the peninsula cannot be reunified, and as long as the peninsula is not reunified, then the importance of China-North Korea relations will always be higher than that of China-South Korea relations. Don't look at the DPRK in the past few years, it seems that it does not listen to China and messes around, but in fact, the reason why the DPRK is so messy is also China's acquiescence, and the relationship between China and the DPRK is not as simple as it seems. Whenever China encounters difficulties in the international community, North Korea will inevitably come out and do something, mocking skills to unleash lala hatred.

    Of course, we must insist that the DPRK does not listen to me, and it is very simple, he has done such a "big rebellion" thing, and he must not listen to me.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The United States wants to deploy a THAAD missile base in South Korea, this missile is mainly to cover China, for China to deploy, the base needs land, Lotte gave his piece of land to the United States as a THAAD base, Lotte has duty-free shops, supermarkets, etc. in many places in China, Lotte earns Chinese's money, but helps the United States deal with China.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The price of electronic products, especially electronic components, has all risen, who do you say has sanctioned whom?

Related questions
29 answers2024-07-20

The loss of the U.S. sanctions on Chinese colleges and universities lies in the fact that we in China cannot come into contact with some advanced Western technology, knowledge, and theories in a short period of time. Thus it will not be possible to bridge the gap with the West in these areas.

8 answers2024-07-20

If you want to retake the test, you can't transfer it, and the regulations are different in each state. >>>More

11 answers2024-07-20

oti-nvocc--nvocc

U.S. Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (OTI-NVOCC) Group Margin Program Application Steps. According to FMC regulations, in order to register with the FMC as a US Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier (OTI-NVOCC), a bond of $150,000 must be provided to the FMC. In order to reduce the applicant's burden of paying such a huge amount of security deposit to a greater extent, and to meet the requirements of domestic freight forwarders and NVOCCs to apply for the business of US NVOCCs, Guangzhou Qishuo handles the insurance business of security deposit on behalf of the applicant, and the specific steps are as follows: >>>More

12 answers2024-07-20

1. Resolutely not let it be slaughtered by a completely uncontrolled market economy! Because what happened to other countries that have been and are being cleaned up by the United States is the strongest proof of this! >>>More

17 answers2024-07-20

Who is this man? Did you write it wrong?