Are so many cover singers on Douyin not infringing? ,

Updated on amusement 2024-07-12
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    "Cover" refers to re-singing a song that has been published and sung by others according to one's own style, including re-writing lyrics and arranging.

    Now there are many celebrities who are covering other people's songs, constantly breaking through themselves in covers, and bringing a different style to everyone. A very important reason why "covers" became popular in the Hong Kong market in the 80s and 90s of the 20th century is that originality cannot keep up with the pace of industrial development. Like Alan Tam.

    and Anita Mui's level of singers, who have to release four to five songs a year, in order to meet the needs of the rapid production of the industry, cover singing is undoubtedly a big shortcut. Chen Shufen.

    In an interview, he said that the reason why there were many covers at the end of the 20th century was that the cost of covers was relatively high compared to originality, and they might face disputes over infringement and plagiarism. Especially for some record companies and media companies, it can save a lot of money by directly spending millions of yuan to buy all the copyrights of a song and use it for future commercial use. The above information refers to the encyclopedia - cover singer.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    As long as the song they cover indicates who the original singer is, and it is not used for commercial use, it is not infringing.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Please wait for a moment to inquire for you.

    Question first of all, if it is a ** work on the Douyin platform, Douyin publicly puts these works on the platform for the background of the user's work **, which basically obtains the information network dissemination right of the work, if these works are disseminated on the platform, it does not constitute infringement. However, if the Douyin platform does not get the adaptation right, and the user uploads these adaptations to the platform, it is likely that Douyin and the platform constitute joint infringement.

    No, because you're not a commercial gig, you don't get a commercial fee.

    It is not an infringement.

    In a word, it is not used for commercial purposes after the cover, and it is not infringing if it is only used for entertainment.

    Do you have any other questions that I would like to continue to answer for you, dear?

    I don't adapt the question, I just sing with the accompaniment of the original song, and I have nothing to ask when I publish.

    Ok thanks.

    Recreational use is non-infringing.

    You're welcome to ask.

    Okay thank you.

    You're welcome goodbye, and I wish you a happy life

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    If it's not infringing, then just sing it? Misleading the people?

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Summary. Hello dear, glad to have your question, not infringement.

    Covering other people's songs during live broadcasts in Douyin is an act of playing songs for others, and it does not constitute infringement, as long as you can indicate the source, infringement refers to changing other people's songs to your own songs last time without the permission of others, so as to constitute infringement, and economic covers do not constitute infringement. On the contrary, it may also make the song more popular for that singer.

    Are so many cover singers on Douyin not infringing?

    Hello dear, glad to have your question, not infringement. Covering other people's songs during live broadcasts on Douyin is an act of playing songs for others with a sock key, and it does not constitute infringement, as long as you can indicate the source, infringement refers to the fact that without the permission of others, the last time you changed someone else's song to your own song, it is old, so that it can constitute infringement, and economic cover does not constitute infringement. On the contrary, this may also make that song have a higher degree of singing for that singer.

    Ask about custom messages].

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Legal Analysis: If a cover of someone else's song is performed for general benefit and no fees are collected from the public or remuneration is not paid to the performer, no remuneration may be paid to the copyright owner without permission. However, using someone else's song to participate in commercial competitions without authorization, and conducting live TV broadcasts, filming MVs, etc., for commercial purposes involves infringement, including singing in bars and singer covers** online dissemination, which may involve infringement.

    The provisions of the copyright system are conducive to the implementation of the principle of fairness in China's civil law, and are also one of the concrete manifestations of protecting the legitimate civil rights and interests of equal civil subjects in civil activities.

    Legal basis: Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China Article 37 Where performing the works of others is used, the performers (actors, performance units) shall obtain permission from the copyright owner and pay remuneration. If a performance organizer organizes a performance, the organizer obtains permission from the copyright owner and pays remuneration.

    The use of works resulting from the adaptation, translation, annotation, or arrangement of existing works for performance shall obtain permission from the copyright owner of the adaptation, translation, annotation, or arrangement of the work and the copyright owner of the original work, and remuneration shall be paid.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Legal analysis: whether singing someone else's song will be accused of copyright infringement depends on the specific circumstances: 1. First of all, it depends on whether the song sung has copyright, if there is no copyright, or if the copyright exceeds the scope of protection, singing will not infringe copyright.

    2. Secondly, it depends on the singing. If the singing is carried out on the street or in a school performance, it is not a profit-making activity, and it does not constitute a crime. 3. Finally, if it is with the consent of the copyright owner, singing someone else's song for profit-making activities will not constitute copyright infringement.

    Through the above analysis, whether singing someone else's song will constitute copyright infringement should be analyzed according to the specific circumstances, and there are constitutive elements for copyright infringement, and it depends on whether the act of singing meets the constituent case of infringement.

    Legal basis: Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China

    Article 15: The compilation of several works, fragments of works, or data or other materials that do not constitute a work, and the selection or arrangement of their content that embodies originality, is a compilation work, and the copyright of the compiler is enjoyed by the compiler, but the copyright of the original work must not be infringed upon when exercising copyright.

    Article 16: The use of works resulting from adaptation, translation, annotation, arrangement, or compilation of existing works for publication, performance, or production of audio or video recordings shall obtain permission from the copyright holder of the work and the copyright owner of the original work, and remuneration shall be paid.

    1) Intentionally deleting or altering rights management information on works, layout designs, performances, audio or video recordings, or radio or television, except where it cannot be avoided due to technical reasons;

    2) Knowing or should know that works, layout designs, performances, audio or video recordings, or rights management information on radio or television have been deleted or altered without permission, and still provide them to the public.

    1) Publishing a work without the permission of the copyright owner;

    2) Without the permission of the co-authors, publishing a work created in collaboration with others as a work created by oneself alone;

    3) Signing the works of others without participating in the creation of works for the purpose of seeking personal fame and wealth;

    4) Distorting or tampering with the works of others;

    5) Plagiarizing the works of others;

    6) Without the permission of the copyright owner, the work is used by means of exhibiting or filming audiovisual works, or the work is used by means such as adaptation, translation, or annotation, except as otherwise provided by this Law;

    7) Failure to pay remuneration for the use of another person's work;

    8) Renting out originals or reproductions of audiovisual works, computer software, or audio or video recordings without the permission of the copyright holders, performers, or producers of audiovisual works, computer software, or audio or video recordings, except as otherwise provided in this Law;

    9) Without the permission of the publisher, using the layout design of the books or periodicals they publish;

    10) Without the performer's permission, live streaming or publicly transmitting their live performance, or recording their performance;

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Summary. Hello, it's my pleasure to answer your <>

    According to your question [Are so many cover singers on Douyin not infringing?] The following is the result of my analysis for you from a legal point of view: it is not infringement, because these cover singers will mark the original song when they release **.

    A very important reason why "covers" became popular in the Hong Kong market in the 80s and 90s of the 20th century is that originality cannot keep up with the pace of industrial development. Singers of the level of Alan Tam and Anita Mui have to release four to five songs a year, and if they want to meet the needs of the rapid production of the industry, cover singing is undoubtedly a big shortcut.

    Are so many cover singers on Douyin not infringing?

    Hello Grip, I'm honored to answer your <>

    According to your question [Are so many cover singers on Douyin not infringing?] ], the following is the result of my analysis for you from a legal point of view: it is not infringement, because these cover singers will mark the original song when they release **.

    A very important reason why "covers" became popular in the Hong Kong market in the 80s and 90s of the 20th century is that originality cannot keep up with the pace of industrial development. Singers of all levels like Alan Tam and Anita Mui have to release four to five songs a year, and if they want to meet the needs of rapid production in the industry, cover singing is undoubtedly a big shortcut.

    Dear Hello Wu Xiao, the following is the relevant legal basis I have found for you, I hope it will be helpful to you: The legal provisions on infringement of the right of investigation in the Civil Code include: if the actor infringes on the civil rights and interests of others due to his fault and causes damage, the cracked orange eggplant shall bear tort liability; Where the actor causes harm to the civil rights and interests of others, regardless of whether the actor is at fault, and the law provides that they shall bear tort liability, follow those provisions, and so forth.

    Kiss, still have questions? Can you elaborate on that? Or is there anything you'd like to talk about?

    If the cover does not infringe on other rights and interests enjoyed by the copyright owner in accordance with the law, it does not constitute infringement; Covers of other people's works shall comply with the relevant regulations and regulations on copyright rights, and must obtain permission and remuneration from the copyright owner, and shall indicate the author's name, the title of the work and the work**, except as otherwise provided by laws and regulations.

    I'm really sorry, because I understand that there is a problem with hunger in the book, I don't understand what you mean, mainly I want to consult you, I'm going to shoot a short ** Douyin and live broadcast, there are some songs that are shown above, without permission, not covered, ripped or used, if I shoot this kind of singing** can I send it out after marking the original song on it? Is it considered an infringement if it is not in posture? Thank you.

    I'm sorry for the trouble<>

    <> kiss Without permission, it is not allowed to cover, rip or use the key, this kind of can not be sent out, it is considered infringement. If your singing is free for the public, and you do not receive remuneration for your own performance, and it is not for profit, it is fair use and not infringement.

Related questions
43 answers2024-07-12

It's not that the resources are bad, it's that the director and screenwriter are too bad, and I don't watch dramas with serious water injection, but I like her "Heartless Mage", the characters are all well shaped, and I can't stand the garbage drama.

3 answers2024-07-12

We make up 17 yuan per mu here, is it too much, solve!!

13 answers2024-07-12

Pregnant women have to sweat during the full moon, because women have experienced the process of childbirth, which is tense, painful and physically consuming, the muscles and bones are wide open, the body is not enough, the vitality has not been restored, the body's resistance is reduced, and the amount of activity of the mother is very small throughout the month, most people dare not wash their hair and take a bath, so that some metabolites are attached to the surface. >>>More

4 answers2024-07-12

I ate 3 persimmons 2 nights ago and started having stomach pain yesterday.

9 answers2024-07-12

Because these women have more outdated ideas, they believe that a woman's responsibility is to teach her husband and children, be a good wife and mother, and take care of the family. For men, it is the man's responsibility to provide for the family and leave the earned money to the woman for safekeeping. This is also a lifestyle that many families are following nowadays. >>>More