The girl shouted for help because the dog fell into the river, and the boy drowned after going down

The girl shouted for help because the dog fell into the river, and then a boy jumped into the river when he heard the sound of help, not knowing that it was the dog he saved, and drowned in the back, who is responsible for the boy's death?

Everyone will feel very sorry to see such a thing, after all, it is still a boy, he heard the sound of help and went down to dive, but he was not told whether to save people or dogs, so he drowned, in fact, from the whole thing, the girl has a certain responsibility, and when the dog came up, he directly hugged the dog and left, and later the companion told her that the boy drowned, she knew that the girl was actually extremely selfish, I didn't want to thank the boy at all, so who was to blame for the boy's death? There are mainly the following situations.

1. Indirect homicide If the girl knew that the boy could not swim, and then jumped into the water to save her dog, but did not inform her that it was not a person but a dog, then the girl must have committed intentional homicide, because she did not stop the boy from diving in time, nor did she inform in advance that it was her dog in the water that caused the boy's death.

2. Responsibilities of the Parties.

What we can take into account is that the girl may have been eager to save the dog at that time, but she was forced to not swim, so the help she shouted for help may also be out of a dog-loving mentality, so the boy himself did not ask the girl what the reason for shouting for help was, so he recklessly jumped into the water and did not consider whether it would threaten his personal safety, so the boy still has a certain responsibility to a certain extent, but the girl found that the boy drowned and did not call the police in time. And then make a corresponding measure, then the girl actually needs to bear a certain amount of criminal responsibility, after all, now that human life is gone, it is also a very painful thing for the boy's parents.

Therefore, the death of the whole boy is under the current law, and the relevant laws and regulations should be further improved in order to better protect some of these warriors who have lost their lives because of righteousness and bravery.

Both the girl and the boy themselves are responsible, and the girl may be less responsible, because the boy voluntarily jumped to save the puppy.

The parents are responsible for themselves, and they have nothing to do with others, they have to jump down to save the dog, and they can't swim at all.

The girl should be held responsible for the boy's death, and she is responsible for the instigation in this matter.

How to say it! This kind of person can't swim himself, but he goes to save a water dog, I can say, he thinks his life is too worthless!

The girl is fully responsible. If it weren't for her exaggeration, the boy wouldn't have jumped in desperately to save the dog, risking his own life for it.

The girl is not responsible for the boy's drowning, because the boy does it voluntarily, but the girl is certainly morally and psychologically uncomfortable.

It is necessary to determine on a case-by-case basis that if the girl is suspected of misleading others, the situation must be responsible.

The 16-year-old boy who was misled into going down the river to save the dog was confirmed to have drowned, and the two girls must be held accountable for the incident. According to Article 183 of China's Civil Code, the beneficiary shall be liable for compensation for the loss suffered by the righteous and courageous, whether it is property loss or loss of life and health. <>

Nowadays, the times are constantly developing, people's quality of life is getting higher and higher, most families will choose to keep pets to accompany themselves, although pets can largely relieve our boredom, but when the danger comes, we should learn to protect the lives of ourselves and others, not because a pet puts others in danger, in this incident, the dog knows that there may be danger, but did not rescue in time, let the loss expand or save people to death, may bear criminal liability for negligent death. <>

How did it happen?

On June 22, 2022, a 16-year-old boy accidentally drowned in the process of saving a dog in the river in Chengdu, Sichuan, which is thought-provoking, in this incident, the woman shouted to save her sister when she called for help, which misled the 16-year-old boy to a certain extent The cleaner uncle who witnessed the whole process said that the woman shouted to save the dog, and the matter has progressed to the point where it is confusing, and the case is still in further progress. Care must be taken so as not to cost one's own life. <>

Are the two girls responsible for this?

I think that in this incident, the two girls must be responsible for their wrong behavior, no matter how valuable a pet dog, how affectionate a pet dog is not as good as a fresh life, the behavior of the two women, there is a suspicion of misleading others, for a 16-year-old person with limited civil capacity, from the perspective of minors, there is a great risk in engaging in righteous and courageous behavior.

To be responsible. According to Article 183 of the Civil Code, where oneself is harmed by the protection of the civil rights and interests of others, there is no infringer, and the victim requests compensation, the beneficiary shall give appropriate compensation.

Therefore, the family of the boy in this case can request compensation from the owner of the puppy.

These two girls are indeed responsible for this incident, and it is precisely because of the two of them that they are seductive and misleading, so that a fresh life disappears immediately.

I think there should be accountability, and if the situation is clear, the boy will not jump so decisively.

I live in the neighboring Nanhu community, and I wanted to ask what the end result of this was, and I saw his mother crying fiercely when I got off work that day.

Chengdu girl shouted for help because the dog fell into the river, does the girl who drowned after the boy went down the river need to bear legal responsibility? In fact, according to my opinion, I think you still have to bear legal responsibility, because the girl drowned after going down the river, then the girl should be legally responsible, as for whether the girl deliberately stood for so long, it was because of the girl that the boy drowned, this is a fact that the facts cannot be distinguished, then the girl should be legally responsible, whether the girl is intentional or unintentional, then the girl should be legally responsible<>

No fault for dismantling and gripping responsibility.

So the reason why this girl is legally responsible, this is because of his no-fault responsibility, then he should be responsible, whether he is beneficial or not, this no-fault responsibility he has to bear, all because he is very fatal, then the boy will go down to the river to cause drowning, this is an immutable fact, so this is a very normal and sleepy person, because what he did caused another person's life to be threatened, then this person should be legally responsible, This is quite normal, and anyone who suffers from this situation should be held legally <>

Legal Provisions. It is precisely because of this girl that the boy's death was caused, then this Luqiqing girl should be held legally responsible, this is very normal, anyone who does this kind of thing, whether the girl is intentional or unintentional, then the girl should be legally responsible, it is precisely because of this girl that the boy drowned, this is an immutable fact, so even if it is because of this girl she was unintentional, she just subconsciously made this kind of action, then she should also be legally responsible<>

According to my idea, then this girl is also legally responsible, of course, this is my opinion, and this is also what I think should be done this way, because of this girl's cause of the boy's drowning accident.

There is no need to bear the responsibility of the law, because the boy was asked for help by the self-defender, and it was not the other party who asked him for help, so he does not need to bear any legal responsibility.

I think girls also need to bear legal responsibility, after all, their practice of meditation has caused very serious consequences, and they also need to pay the corresponding price for their actions, and their behavior has already violated the relevant laws, and they need to bear criminal or travel responsibility.

Unless the girl has induced or deceived her, she will not be held legally responsible, but she will definitely be morally condemned.

will incur criminal or civil liability.

It is really sad and regrettable that a teenager in the prime of life lost his life because he went to save a dog that fell into the water. At the same time, there are also big questions about whether the girl who asked for help caused the teenager's death because of negligence. As a woman who cried for help that led to the tragedy, she should stand up and tell the truth, so as not to chill this innocent teenager who lost his life and his family.

The puppy falls into the river and the girl calls for help.

On June 20, 2022, two women were walking with a puppy by a river in Chengdu, and the puppy fell into the river accidentally. The two women shouted for help when the dog fell into the river, and soon two boys playing basketball nearby rushed over. The girl's mouth shouted words like saving her sister.

However, some citizens who were present at the time said that the girl said that she was sister, and the judge later explained. Said that my sister was a puppy. <>

The boy went down to the river to save the dog from drowning.

One of the two boys, a taller boy, immediately jumped into the river to save the puppy, but as he swam, he suddenly sank and was never to be seen again. People immediately called the police, and when rescuers arrived at the accident site, they immediately searched and rescued the boy. Heart-wrenching, when the boy was found, he had no vital signs.

After the incident, people condemned the two women, believing that they had misled the boy, and the boy thought that it was a human being who fell into the water, so the boy went down to the river to rescue, and as a result, an accident occurred, and the two girls were held criminally responsible. <>

What are the responsibilities of the girl involved?

A lawyer said that the boy's act of rescuing the puppy was an act of righteousness and courage because he was protecting the belongings of the two girls. The two girls did not need to bear criminal responsibility because they had never known the boy in their lives, explained the situation when they called for help, and did not intend to kill the boy. Therefore, there should be no criminal liability, but civil liability.

Some netizens believe that it is untenable for the woman to shout that Jane Zi is suspected of intentional homicide or negligence causing death, because the premise for the establishment of intentional homicide is that there must be an intention to intentionally and unlawfully deprive others of their lives, and in this case, the woman subjectively did not have the intention to intentionally and illegally deprive the boy of his life; The premise for the establishment of the crime of negligence causing death is that there must be negligence in the victim's death, and negligence can be divided into overconfident negligence (having foreseen that one's behavior may have a result harmful to society but being credulous can avoid it) and negligent negligence (one should have foreseen that one's behavior could have a result harmful to society, but failed to foresee it because of negligence), and in this case, the woman did not ask the boy to jump into the water to rescue him, so there was no negligence in the boy's death.

The woman needs to call out that the royal brother is liable for compensation, and the demolition needs to bear the current responsibility, and she also needs to compensate the man for all the losses, the family of the victim Zheng Raider apologizes, and the victim's family also needs to compensate the victim's family for mental damages.

When the girl had an emergency, she did not stop the little boy from going down to the river to save the dog, but used the sideline Fang Qing to destroy the world, and when the boy was in danger, she did not take effective measures to help him, so she carried a relatively large amount of responsibility and needed to bear the corresponding civil liability.

Recently, there has been a side of the news, which has caused a lot of heated discussions among netizensA 16-year-old boy was misled by two girls into going down to the river to save a dog from drowning

I'll talk about it according to my own thoughts.

First of all, let's talk about the whole story, many people in the neighborhood testified that at the beginning, the woman's dog accidentally fell into the river, and the woman asked the surrounding adults for help. Adults were reluctant to risk their lives to go down to the river to save the dog because they heard it was a dog. Seeing this, the woman ran to a nearby basketball court for help, because she was afraid that others would refuseFalsely claiming that her sister fell into the river, which also explains why the two women ran to the basketball court farther away to ask for help

The 16-year-old boy explained that he could not swim, but the two women thought that the boy was tall and would be fineBecause the boy was eager to save people, he went to the river to rescue him. Because the river was very wide, the boy did not distinguish between a man and a dog in the river, so he rushed to the rescue。Finally the boy took the dog back to the shore, and the two women took the dog away from the riverThe boy drowned due to cramps in the temperature of the river, etc

Listened to the whole story of this matterI can't help but feel sorry for the boy's death and feel extremely angry at the woman's lying。In my opinion, there is a high probability that these two women committed itManslaughter

Why do I say that, I have the following basis for judgment:

The results of the incident have already been stated in the report, and there are personnel **.

The woman concealed the truth of the matter, misled others to carry out dangerous acts, and led to serious consequences。(according to the reported situation).

There is a clear causal relationship between the woman's misjudgment and the ** Renchang Mask. Bureau of Swift Wax.

Based on the above, it can be said that the woman may have committed manslaughter.

In addition to condemning these people, what will we do when we encounter such incidents in the future?

I thinkWhether or not we encounter a real rescue incident, our first priority is to ensure our own personal safety。Because our lives are not only our own, but also our responsibilities to the country, society and family. Secondly, saving people requires excellent skills, and we must fully realize the environment we are in, and whether we have the ability to save people.

Rescue should only be carried out if you are guaranteed not to be in danger. In case of danger, call for help as soon as possible, do not blindly rescueFor malicious rumors that lead to the consequences of the rescuer, we must investigate their criminal responsibility, and we cannot let go of any bad person.