-
Anonymous users2024-02-13It is very unreliable, in terms of China's mechanical research and development strength, even if there are more people in the army, it is useless, and it is not bad to rank seventh. Russian technology is old, and a robot with transistors does not even have an LCD screen. Not to mention the rest, if there is no investment in technology, the army will not develop, and it cannot be compared with a military power.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-12To be honest, it's very unreliable.
The countries you mentioned can build aircraft carriers basically rely on imported technology, including France, and its aircraft carrier catapult device is only American technology.
And Italy and Spain, I don't know how to get them in, their own ** can be said to be useless, Italy has a ram tank at that time, barely able to rank within 15 in the world. Spain, on the other hand, is a completely forgotten role in international military affairs.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-11Forehead ......>What ...... are you sharing?
If you are only considering the technology and water to divide the world's military powers, I suggest you do not need to divide them.
It doesn't make sense. War, not rely on a few ** can decide the outcome of the victory, the soldier's will to fight and the commander's command art are also very important, how to continue to create our local battlefield numerical superiority under the same force conditions, with an absolute superiority over the other side, this is the true meaning of war.
Do you think war is something, one or two super ** things that can be changed?
There is such a thing as a military power, and no one knows who is the strongest if you don't fight it.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10You're too vegetable. France, Italy, Ukraine, the Netherlands are not technologically advanced, and Russia is stronger.
One or two pieces don't make the difference between success and failure.
It is not possible to use only the best R&D capabilities as parameters.
It is necessary to refer to many parameters such as population, land area, standing forces, etc.
No conclusions can be made.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09The last sentence is in the case of launching a blitzkrieg, as long as the reserves are sufficient, it is difficult to stand, and it can even be used to fight to support the war.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-08It feels like China and India belong to the same level.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-07Guided by the situation, things are man-made.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Ukraine has scrapped all the technology.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05Yes, the world of the jungle.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04In military technology, Israel is definitely in the top 3. China! Hehe, the WS10 space engine has been studied for 30 years, and it is not as good as the engines of Russia and the United States for more than 8 years. It also has to rely mainly on outsourcing. The Navy is not to mention how rotten.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-03Tied for first place: the United States and Russia are tied for second, Britain and France are tied for third, China and Japan are tied for fourth, South Korea and North Korea are tied for fifth, Germany and India are tied for sixth, and Israel and Italy are the world's top six military powers.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-02The first recognized United States.
The second is Russia, the emaciated camel is bigger than the horse, and the only country in the world that can completely destroy the United States.
The third is China. In the event of a full-scale war, it has the ability to turn the United States into a third-rate country.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-01From the current point of view, it is "the United States, China, Russia".
-
Anonymous users2024-01-31First, the United States.
Second, Russia.
Third, China.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-30Beijiang water, Nanjiang water, Nanlingzi.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-29USA, Russia, European Union.
China got 8.9 like this.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-28The first is the United States.
The second is Russia.
The third is China.
France and Britain are almost 45, although the overall equipment is better than China's, but the population is far less than China's kind of aircraft, more goes, Japan and Russia have this kind of aircraft.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-27The United States, Russia, China, France, Britain, Germany, India, North Korea (large number of troops), Israel, Pakistan (official, more formal ranking) are almost all nuclear states.
It should be no problem for China to rank third in terms of comprehensive military power.
China does not have an aircraft similar to the AC-130 The AC-130 in the United States is modified from the C-130 transport aircraft China has a transport aircraft similar to the C-130, that is, the Y-9 (Y-9), but I have not heard of the talk of changing it to an attack aircraft, and it is estimated that it will not be very difficult to realize This kind of aircraft is mainly due to good battlefield adaptability, simple requirements for the runway, and very good performance ratio at low altitude and low speed.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-26The United States ranked 1st, Russia ranked 2nd, and China ranked 3rd
-
Anonymous users2024-01-25Comparison of military science and technology classes.
1.United States. 2.Russia.
3.Germany. 4.United Kingdom.
5.Japan. 6.France.
7.China! 8.Australia.
10.Canada.
Military combat power ranking.
1.China! 2.Japan.
3.Russia.
4.Germany. 5.United States.
6.United Kingdom. 7.India.
8.France. 9.Israel.
10.Australia.
Military units are highly ranked for intensive training and discipline.
1.Russia.
2.China! 3.Germany.
4.United States. 5.Thailand.
6.Japan. 7.United Kingdom.
8.France. 9.Australia.
10.Canada.
Let's say the Third World War, the resistance is ranked.
1.Russia.
2.China! 3.India.
4.United States. 5.Israel.
6.Thailand. 7.Germany.
8.Australia.
9.United Kingdom. 10.Korea.
Let's say the Third World War, the offensive capabilities are ranked.
1.United States. 2.Russia.
3.Japan. 4.Germany.
5.China! 6.France.
7.United Kingdom. 8.Brazil.
9.India. 10.Australia.
Let's say the Third World War, the defense capability ranking.
1.United States. 2.Russia.
3.China! 4.Germany.
5.United Kingdom. 6.France.
7.Australia.
8.Canada.
9.Japan. 10.Israel.
Ranking of military capabilities after synthesis.
1.United States. 2.Russia.
3.China! 4.Germany.
5.United Kingdom. 6.Japan.
7.France. 8.Australia.
9.Canada.
10.India.
11.Brazil.
12.Israel.
Resistance ranking.
1.Russia.
2.China! 3.India.
4.United States. 5.Israel.
6.Thailand. 7.Germany.
8.Australia.
9.United Kingdom. 10.Korea.
Military combat power ranking.
1.China! 2.Japan.
3.Russia.
4.Germany. 5.United States.
6.United Kingdom. 7.India.
8.France. 9.Israel.
10.Australia.
-
Anonymous users2024-01-24The latest ranking of the comprehensive strength of the world's military powers is as follows: First place: United States Second place:
Russia 3rd place China 4th place: Germany 5th place: India 6th place:
Great Britain Japan 8th place: France 9th place: Australia 10th place:
11th place in Spain: Thailand 12th place: Israel 13th place:
Argentina 14th place: Pakistan 15th place South Korea The answer to this question was provided by the little madman, thank you for adopting.
In 1005, the Song Liaozhou Peace Treaty was called the "Lanyuan Alliance". >>>More
This year, 22 March marks the 12th World Water Day, and the theme of this year's World Water Day is "Water and Disasters". >>>More
The biggest change in iOS 14 is the introduction of a new app library, which can automatically store all the apps on your phone on one page, making it easy for users to choose. At the same time, users can also hide a page. (Personally, I feel that the ugliness can't be removed). >>>More
The isthmus is a narrow strip of land between two bodies of water, an intermediate bridge between continents and continents, continents and peninsulas, and a boundary between the sea. The geographical location is particularly important, most of them are the throat arteries of transportation, and some connect the two continents, such as the Isthmus of Panama, also known as the Isthmus of Central America, connecting North and South America, and the Isthmus of Suez connecting Asia and Africa; Some connect semi-peninsulas with the mainland, such as the Kra Isthmus, which is a bridge connecting the Indochina Peninsula to the north and the Malay Peninsula to the south to the Malay Peninsula and the Eurasian continent. The Perekop Isthmus connects mainland Ukraine with the Crimean peninsula. >>>More
The U.S. Army is the strongest, whether it is combat experience or equipment, the second should be the Israel Defense Forces, and then the Russian Army and the British Army, (here did not join the German Army, after World War II, Germany was very cautious about fighting abroad, but considering the German Army tradition, I personally think that the combat effectiveness is comparable to the U.S. Army) It is difficult to compare individual combat capabilities in modern army operations, and if exercises and some competitions, the strongest individual combat capability is the Chinese Army, But there is no comparison between wars and exercises, as for the ranking of the Chinese Army, everyone has a different opinion, the ranking of some foreign military magazines does not consider combat experience and actual combat effectiveness, just a simple comparison of military equipment and numbers, the Chinese Army is second only to the US Army in these rankings because of the huge number of people and equipment, personal opinion The Chinese Army ranks about 5-6 in the world, has not experienced war for 30 years, and China's strategic theory and tactical thinking are very old, In particular, the level of competence of the commanders at the grassroots level (battalion, company, platoon).