How to answer history questions, history questions answering skills

The history of high school is all about stepping on points, that is, if you answer less, you will deduct points, but if you answer more, you will not deduct points.

For example, in the historical title, the reason for this material should be stated, and this must first understand what this material is talking about, so that it can be clearly stated in the first sentence what event or what system this material is talking about. (It is best to add a specific time of events, or the period when the system was enforced, similar to dynasties, etc.). After that, you will generally ask about the characteristics, which depends on whether you usually read the book carefully, and it is best to summarize some important systems and events.

It could be political or economic, it could be humanities or technology. It would be even better if there were certain obvious qualities (which generally appear in politics and modern history). There is also influence, which is best divided into temporary impact, that is, the impact on the time, and long-term impact, that is, what important changes will be made in the direction of the country or the world in the later period.

Of course, the impact is inseparable from the topic of the course, and it is best to understand which lesson in your textbook it requires so that you can answer more comprehensively. As for revelation, my suggestion is to start with the impact of the event on the aftermath and answer the big picture, so that you can get points. Personal opinions also need to be added to the mix.

In this way, points will not be lost. If it's ancient material, then let's read it first

Reading more books and summarizing more is the key. Hope my method works for you.

It is divided into three sections: politics, economy and culture.

The tips for answering history questions are as follows:

2. Questioning: Look at the indication, embodiment, cause, purpose, impact, etc.

3. Take a multi-pronged approach and try different methods.

1) Screening method: according to the review of the question, figure out the basic requirements of the question, according to the basic requirements, filter one of the four options until you find the right option.

3) Guessing method: If you don't know the options clearly and can't determine the correct option, you can use the guessing method, and there are the following rules when guessing: in general, if the options are beyond the scope of textbook knowledge or beyond the scope of the curriculum, it is wrong.

Answering ideas: 1. The written expression of the answer.

Basic method: Text expression should be well-written, neatly arranged, and sparse and proper; Second, the sentences should be smooth, plain, and accurate; Third, it is necessary to "three modernizations" in form, that is, paragraphization, one question and one paragraph, concise and intuitive; Key points, a scoring point of the next sentence: serial numbering, different paragraphs and different sentences marked with different serial numbers, so that it is clear and clear at a glance.

2. How to analyze the reasons for the success or failure of the law change or reform.

Basic methods: First, look at the trend and trend of historical development at that time, and whether the reform or change of law conforms to the historical trend and trend. Second, we should see whether the reform policies and measures are correct and whether they can be effectively implemented. Third, look at the contrast between the forces of the old and new forces. Fourth, look at the quality of the reformers.

3. The idea of solving explicit comparative question and answer questions.

Basic Method: The characteristic of explicit comparative question and answer questions is that the scope of comparison is deterministic. When answering, it is necessary to carefully review the comparison objects, comparison items, and constraints, analyze the relationship between the requirements of the question and answer questions and the knowledge of the textbook, and then follow the logical relationship between the set items.

Contact materials and book knowledge.

Set of formulas, syllogisms.

1.What impact did this have on the situation at the time, either positively (what was advanced and who was hit hard) or negative (although generally the positive impact outweighed the negative impact);

2.From the perspective of the historical process, this matter was ideologically progressive (that is, what we now call advanced), as well as the limitations of the society at that time (mainly because of the limitations of the people's productive forces at that time);

3.If the history after 1840 can talk about the impact on the world, for example, it is part of the world's struggle, and if it involves national development, it can be said that it promotes national integration and so on;

It is possible to dismantle each point and discuss it, but in general it is like this.

If you really don't know, write as much as you can, try to pull it up, and be sure to fill it up.

First of all, it will be answered from the perspective of promoting the historical process and economic development, and then it will talk about national integration, and then talk about political development. Generally speaking, it is the productive forces that determine the relations of production, and the relations of production react on the productive forces.

What impact did it have on the time, what kind of impact it had on future generations, etc., anyway, at least what is the use of this thing.