Difference Between Dialectical Contradiction and Logical Contradiction Example!

There is both a difference and a connection between dialectical contradiction and logical contradiction. First of all, the two must be strictly distinguished. Logical contradiction refers to inconsistencies, self-conflicts, and contradictions in thinking.

This is caused by subjectivity, caused by the violation of logical rules by human thinking, and should be excluded from thinking.

Dialectical contradiction is the unity of opposites, which is objective and universal, and cannot be denied or eliminated. It has two basic attributes: the identity of the contradiction and the struggle of the contradiction. (1) The identity of the contradiction refers to the nature of the interconnection between the two sides of the contradiction, which includes two meanings:

First, the two sides of the contradiction are interdependent and the premise of each other's existence, and the two sides coexist in a unity. Second, the two sides of the contradiction are interconnected, and there is a bridge between them, which is mainly manifested in the fact that the two sides of the contradiction penetrate each other, including the tendency of each to transform into its own opposite.

2) The fighting nature of the contradiction refers to the nature and tendency of the two sides of the contradiction to exclude each other and oppose each other.

3) The identity and struggle of contradictions are both distinct from each other and interrelated.

To sum up, there are various differences between dialectical contradiction and logical contradiction, but they both belong to the category of cognition, and they are both specific views on contradictions.

Dialectical contradiction is the relationship between opposition and unity of any object or process itself. It is a contradiction of reality that exists in all things and phenomena in nature and society, as well as in the human mind. Such as:

Contradictions in nature, such as attraction and repulsion, positive and negative electricity, synthesis and decomposition, heredity and variation; Productive forces and production relations in human society.

The exploiting class and the exploited class, war and peace.

The contradiction between democracy and the legal system is a dialectical contradiction. For example, in the judgment that the people's teacher is both a teacher and a student, the two sides of the contradiction are both opposed to each other and related to each other.

Teaching is based on learning, and learning is for the sake of better teaching, which is precisely the characteristic of dialectical contradictions. Logical contradiction: Also known as "self-contradiction".

It refers to the judgments made by the same subject (individual or collective) that contradict each other (cannot be the same true or false) or oppose each other (cannot be the same true but can be the same as false). For example, "I admit that there are contradictions in everything, but I don't think there are contradictions in our class."

For example, "the people's teacher is the engineer of the human soul" and "the people's teacher is not the engineer of the human soul" are two contradictory judgments, and the two sides of the contradiction absolutely reject each other and cannot agree with the truth, which is the characteristic of logical contradiction. A logical contradiction is an ideological contradiction, which is different from dialectics.

Said kind of ideological contradictions. The differences are: 1. Logical contradiction is the manifestation of ideological confusion, while dialectical contradiction is the ideological reaction of objective things; 2. Logical contradiction is the result of violating the rules of thinking and is abnormal; Dialectical contradiction is inherent in normal thinking; 3. Logical contradiction is the obstacle to the development of thinking, and dialectical contradiction is the driving force for the development of thinking; 4. Logical contradictions can be eliminated, while dialectical contradictions are inevitable; 5. Contradictions are inherent and play a role in promoting and inhibiting the logical development of things.

1) Dialectical contradiction refers to the relationship between two internal aspects of things that are both opposing and unified, in short, dialectical contradiction is the unity of opposites. Dialectical contradictions are objective and universal.

2) Logical contradiction refers to inconsistencies and conflicts in thinking. Logical contradictions are subjective, caused by human thinking violating the rules of logic, and should be excluded from thinking.

3) Dialectical contradictions and logical contradictions should not be confused. Confusing the two would lead to an erroneous view that denies the objectivity and universality of dialectical contradictions.

Right. Because everything is dialectically contradictory. It is not the dialectical contradiction that determines the world, but the existence of the world itself that determines that human practice is dialectically contradictory.

It exists in objective reality and is inherent in the object itself. Dialectical contradiction is not the contradiction of erroneous judgments, but the contradiction of reality. The correct reflection of this dialectical contradiction of reality in our thinking forms the dialectical contradiction in our thinking.

Dialectical contradiction is the source of the development of all things. The dialectical contradiction is fundamentally different from the logical contradiction formed by the erroneous nature of subjective understanding, and the two must not be confused.

Contradictory characteristics:

The universality and particularity of contradictions are the categories that describe the characteristics of the existence of contradictions. The universality of contradiction means that contradiction exists in all things and runs through the whole process of development, which contains two meanings: first, contradiction exists in the development process of all things; Second, contradictions exist throughout the development process of every thing.

The relationship between the universal and the particular of contradictions, that is, the relationship between commonality and individuality, between the general and the individual, is dialectically unified. Universality exists in particularity, particularity contains universality, the universality and particularity of contradictions cannot replace each other, and the universality and particularity of contradictions can be transformed into each other under certain conditions.

The difference between dialectical contradiction and logical contradiction is as follows:

Dialectical contradiction refers to the unity of opposites contained in things in objective reality. It is a universal contradiction of all things (i.e., "everything exists" and "always exists"), and it is a realistic and objective contradiction, not a contradiction of erroneous judgments. Dialectical contradiction is the driving force and source of the development of all things.

When this dialectical contradiction of reality is correctly reflected in thinking, a dialectical contradiction in thinking is formed.

Logical contradiction refers to the logical error caused by violating the requirements of the law of contradiction in the thinking process. That is, affirming two contradictory propositions or judgments in the same thought process that they are both true. Logical contradictions are generally manifested as self-contradictions in the process of thinking and argumentation.

For example, there is such a fable in "Han Feizi": "The Chu people have a shield and a spear, and the reputation says: 'My shield is strong, and things can't be trapped.'"

He also praised his spear and said: 'The benefit of my spear is that everything is trapped.' Or say:

What is the spear of the son, the shield of the trap? 'His people are also able to respond. The two judgments made by this man who sold spears and shields are mutually negative, and "the shield that cannot be trapped and the spear that is not trapped cannot stand together in the world" are logically contradictory.

Any thought that contains logical contradictions cannot be established, and therefore correct thinking must exclude all logical contradictions. Lenin said: "'Logical contradictions' – of course, under the conditions of correct logical thinking – are not desirable in either economic analysis or political analysis.