What are the philosophical contradictions that can help people think? Give an example?

The solution of the contradiction is not the disappearance of the contradiction, but the replacement of the old by the new thing, which takes the following forms:

First, one side of the contradiction breaks through the shackles of the other party and forms a new adaptive relationship.

2. One side of the contradiction overcomes, overcomes, and even "eats" the other.

3. Both sides of the contradiction will come to an end, forming a new relationship of opposition and unity.

Fourth, the two sides of the contradiction are integrated and unified to form a new and higher thing.

The contradictions of the philosophy are: positive and negative, action and reaction, silver female and male, addition and subtraction, exhalation and inhalation, up and down, etc.

The contradiction in philosophy means that no matter what is a contradiction, it is composed of two contradictory aspects, both of which are divided into two, and there is no world without contradictions, and there is no problem.

The basic attributes of contradictions: antagonism (struggle), unity (identity) The fighting nature of contradictions is mutual exclusion and mutual opposition; Identity is interdependence and mutual transformation.

1.Antithesis is the premise of unity, because what is not opposed is not unified. For example: big and high (not unified because not opposite); Big and small (unity, because of opposites).

2.Opposites dwell in identity and are conditioned by unity, because what is not unified is not opposite. For example: the ex-husband is a friend (after the dissolution of the marriage, it is not unified, so it is not opposite).

Controversy is opposite, so the universality of contradiction here, which has nothing to do with the universal and the particular: it refers to the contradiction from time to time, and there is contradiction in everything.

Spear is commonality, and Spear is individuality).

Particularity: refers to the fact that each thing and each aspect of the contradiction has its own characteristics.

The dispute in the title is the opposite, so it has nothing to do with the universal and the particular.

The resolution of the contradiction is not the disappearance of the contradiction, but the replacement of the old by the new, in the form of the following:

a One party to the contradiction breaks through the shackles of the other and forms a new adaptive relationship.

b One side of the contradiction overcomes, overcomes, and "eats" the other.

c Both sides of the contradiction will be wiped out, forming a new relationship of opposition and unity.

d The two sides of the contradiction merge and unify to form a new and higher thing.

1.Both sides of the contradiction will be destroyed;

2.One side of the contradiction overcomes the other;

3.The two sides of the contradiction form a new form of coordinated movement;

4.The two sides of the contradiction merge into a new thing.

No, philosophy can guide people's thoughts, not be influenced by idealistic and metaphysical thinking, and do not provide specific methods of practice.

The concrete method does not belong to the category of philosophy, it is at most a method that can guide the specific method, and I think that some of the properties of philosophy can be understood as a method of concrete method...

I don't think this statement is wrong, it's just not rigorous.

Hegel:"Everything that is rational is realistic, and everything that is realistic is rational. "(Ibid. Minor Logic.)

In Hegel, reason is not only the subjective ideality, but also the essence of things, and things are in accordance with their own essence, so what is rational must become reality; And only what is rational can be "called" reality, and therefore everything that is realistic is reasonable.

In reality, everyone will encounter all kinds of problems, some problems can be solved immediately, some can not be solved for a while, his existence has a certain degree of rationality, but there is no time to pendulum, philosophy can not provide you with a way to solve every specific problem, philosophy tells us that only rational things exist in reality, the words are a bit awkward but very effective.

"Connection" theories this.

Sample definition contradictory. Source.

It also defines what BAI is subjective experience and objective knowledge.

du。This is the ultimate righteousness that surpasses all previous philosophical thoughts.

There is a contradiction when there is a subjective and objective difference in the connection. On the contrary, the subjective and objective coincide to eliminate contradictions. The connection without contradiction embodies ultimate rationality.

The process of contradiction and its opposition and unity is transformed into abstraction and the relationship between them to form subjective experience, and the abstract association of the unconscious realm of connection is expressed into objective knowledge, which regards spirit as an overall connection with independent significance, reflecting the relationship between itself, the external world and things, and supporting the existence, independence, freedom and perfection of the movement of spirit relative to matter.