Specific wording to prevent pigs from hurting farmers, and pigs from hurting the people

The fundamental reason for preventing pigs from hurting farmers and hurting the people lies in the balance between supply and demand markets. Here's how:

1.Improve the accuracy of the market and improve the level of information sharing. In order to facilitate the correct decision-making of farmers, adjust the breeding structure, and reduce unnecessary losses.

2.Establish a supply and demand regulation mechanism for the pig market. When the supply exceeds demand, the first to store pigs, and give farmers a certain subsidy. When the supply exceeds the demand, the reserve pigs will be put on the market.

3.Increase the variety of pig breeding insurance.

4.Increase the investment in regulation.

5.out of the use of ** trading and other means to stabilize the pigs**.

Raw material procurement is carried out through the trading of corn, soybean meal and other first-class varieties to lock in the cost of pig breeding. Carry out pig trading, provide the market with guiding expectations, and provide a "sell before raising" mechanism, so that farmers and enterprises can lock in profits in advance and avoid risks, so that they can solve the problem of "pigs hurting the people" and "pigs hurting farmers" from the market mechanism level. Like a large-scale "company + farmer" industrialized pig management enterprise, with the best market, you can rest assured and boldly expand the scale of the contract with farmers, and then sell the contracted live pigs in advance through the first market to ensure the company's performance ability and sustainable operation, and further close cooperative relations with farmers.

At present, grain, oil, and pork all have this phenomenon, and this is a product of market law and semi-market-oriented regulation and control. However, the country cannot be completely liberalized, which involves the national economy and people's livelihood. Other countries have not fully liberalized either.

The more successful one is the United States. By subsidizing agriculture, they ensure the income and motivation of farmers, while taking into account the cost of living for the population. Now China wants to learn from the United States, but it has not yet mastered the essence, but it has made great progress.

For example, the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China encourages rural industrialization and intensification, and encourages the limited circulation of rural land, which can reduce the cost of agricultural products to a certain extent, provide efficiency and benefits, and on the other hand, will not improve the quality of agricultural products. The second is information transparency, timely publication of agricultural product inventory, output, amount in column, etc., so that growers can grasp the supply and demand situation in a timely manner; Then increase the income of farmers through agricultural subsidies. It is expected that in another 10 years, pigs will hurt farmers and pigs will slowly die of laughter.

Solution: (1) By the meaning of the topic, <>

Solution: m=yuan

2) From the change of corn in February and May, the next month is always more than the previous month** per 500 grams, and the ** of June corn is: 500 grams.

May growth rate: <>

** of June pork: 6 (1 <>

Yuan 500 grams

w=<>

Measures should be taken

3) Pork ** in May is: 6 yuan 500 grams, and the growth rate of pork ** in each month is a, and pork ** in July is: 6 (1 + a)2

Yuan 500 grams

May corn ** is: 1 yuan 500 grams, and the monthly corn ** growth rate is 2 times the growth rate of pork ** in the current month, that is, 2a, July corn ** is: 1 (1 + 2a)2

Yuan 500 grams

According to the title, 6 (1 + a) 2

1（1+2a）2

Solution, <>

Or <> "If it doesn't fit the topic, give it up, <>

$6, not (or: necessarily) need to be taken

Just as the grain is cheap and hurts the peasants, the price of live pigs is low, and the peasants will lose money if they cannot sell them at the cost price or earn less, and the peasants will lose money and hurt the peasants' interests.

Isn't it causing economic harm to farmers if pigs are cheap?

That is, the farmer will lose money due to the ** reduction of pigs.

The first needs the support and protection of the first one, the current grain direct subsidy, comprehensive agricultural subsidies, agricultural machinery subsidies, the minimum protection price of grain, the development of agricultural policy insurance, etc. all belong to this.

The second is the development of characteristic agriculture, generally speaking, the first intervention in the grain market is the mainstream opinion in China, but this is not conducive to the healthy development of China's grain industry in the long run.

The real key question is how to maintain the efficient functioning of the food market. Only a well-developed market is in the best interest of all parties, whether farmers, consumers or intermediaries. In terms of protecting and realizing the interests of farmers, the organization of farmers' cooperatives is an achievable way.

One of the essential differences between cooperatives and corporations is that the profits obtained are returned to the farmers according to the transaction amount.

"Grain cheapness hurts peasants" is a classic problem in economics. How much a farmer can sell his grain after harvesting depends on two factors: the output and the price of grain, which are the product of the two.

But these two variables are not independent, but are interrelated, and their correlation is determined by a downward sloping line of demand for food. That is, the lower the demand, the greater the demand; **The higher it is, the less demand it will have. It should also be noted that the food demand line lacks elasticity, that is, the demand is not very sensitive to changes in **.

When the price of food is **, the demand for food increases, but not by much. The basic truth lies in the fact that food is a necessity, and the demand for food is mainly determined by the physiological demand for food. In addition, the proportion of food spent on food is now small and will continue to grow for most people, making people insensitive to changes in food prices.

This is the contradiction between the supply and demand of the social economy and the value of monetary goods.

Solution: (1) By the meaning of the topic, <>

Solution: m=

2) From the change of corn in February and May, it is known that the next month is always more than the previous month** per 500 grams

Or: let y=kx+b, will (2,,(3,substitute, get y=,put (4,,6 months of corn **is: yuan 500 grams;

May growth rate: <>

** of June pork: 6 (1 <>

Yuan 500 grams

w=<>

6. Measures should be taken

3) July pork ** is: <>

Yuan 500 gramsJuly corn ** is: <>

Yuan 500 grams

By the title, <>

Solution, <>

If it doesn't fit the topic, give it away

<> doesn't (or: necessarily) need to take action.

Vegetables are expensive, it is difficult for the people to eat vegetables, vegetables are cheap, and farmers lose their old capital. In fact, when vegetables are expensive, farmers may not make money, seed cost + fertilizer cost + labor + freight + booth fee + sanitation fee, basically can make some, not much, this is only some farmers direct sales, and most farmers are sold to collect vegetables, basically all losses. For example, celery, when the farmer sells it, it is 1 mao 2, while the people buy it is 1 yuan 2, and the potatoes are sold for more than 2 cents, and when they sell it for more than 2 yuan.

All of the difference was taken by Tier 1 (30% markup), Level 2 (30% markup) wholesalers and retailers (more than 30% markup). So no matter whether the dish is expensive or not, it is "shouting at both ends and laughing in the middle".

I'm sorry, I think it should be similar to the situation of the grain and farmers in economics, so the following is an economic analysis of the grain and farmers in economics, I hope it can give you the answer.

Economic Analysis of Grain Cheap Peasants:

It is a well-spread idiom in our country, which means that the grain harvest has been harvested, but the income of peasant households has decreased. By extension, will good news for agriculture be bad news for farmers? The fundamental reason for this phenomenon is that food is a necessity of life, and its demand elasticity is very small.

If the grain yield and output are determined by spontaneous supply and demand, there will be a situation where grain is cheap and farmers are hurt, as shown in the figure below.

In the diagram, for a grain with a production cycle, the grain yield in a certain production cycle is a constant, therefore, the supply curve of the grain.

It's a perpendicular line.

Assuming that the grain production of the previous year is Q0, the corresponding equilibrium**.

is p0. After this year's bumper grain harvest, the supply curve shifted from S0 to the right and the equilibrium** fell to P1. The increase in income due to the bumper grain harvest is quadrilateral.

Q0Q1E1H, while the loss of income due to the decline in food prices is the area of the quadrilateral p0p1he0. Obviously, the decrease in income is greater than the increase in income, so the income of the peasants decreases after the grain harvest. This is what is commonly said to be "grain cheapness hurts farmers", which is the so-called truth that a bumper yield is not a bumper harvest.

This is a derivative of the "grain cheapness hurting farmers" in economics. For example, green vegetables were originally 2 yuan a catty, but they cost 3 yuan a catty to buy in the supermarket, and it is expensive for people to buy vegetables, which is the so-called "injury", that is, "expensive vegetables hurt the people"; Although the vegetables in the vegetable field have been harvested, the purchase price of a pound is only one pound, and the planting cost of farmers is one pound, if the cost of manual picking is added to a pound, in that case, selling a pound of vegetables will lose yuan, and if you don't sell it, you will only lose 1 yuan a pound, so farmers would rather rot the vegetables in the ground than **, and "injury" has become inevitable, that is, "vegetables hurt farmers".

Vegetables are expensive, there are fewer vegetables, and things are scarce, and ordinary people think that basic life is under pressure and hurt! If the vegetable is cheap, the vegetable is produced too much for a period of time, the supply is oversupply, and if it cannot be sold, the vegetable farmer will lose money and be hurt! Next time, they didn't dare to plant more, but they didn't have enough to sell, the supply exceeded demand, and the vegetables were sold**, and now the citizens were injured again, and the cycle was like this!!

It's not planned!

The fact that the vegetable price hurts the people means that the price of vegetables has an impact on people's consumption, and the vegetable price hurts farmers because of the large-scale vegetable planting that causes the price of vegetables to fall, and farmers cannot recover the cost, and this time South Korea is the most serious.

It means that last year's vegetables were too expensive, and everyone thought it was too expensive, and a cabbage cost 2 yuan. The cost is too high, a waste of money, and the other sentence means that the vegetables are too cheap now, and a few cents a pound of cabbage will make farmers lose a lot of money, and even some people are not alive since k (indeed some people are from k).

Vegetables are expensive, the people can't afford to buy them, eating vegetables is a very serious problem, so that the interests of the people are hurt, however, if the vegetables are cheap, the enthusiasm of the people to grow vegetables will be reduced, and the enthusiasm will be reduced, then the productivity will also be reduced, in general, this damages the interests of the country, from the first, the interests of farmers will be reduced. In a word, this is a matter of the state.

To put it simply, this year's vegetable planting is a bumper harvest, and farmers can only buy 3-8 cents of vegetables when they grow too much, and they lose a lot; But on the other hand, the price of vegetables at the retail end is still high, and ordinary residents still feel that it is too expensive to buy vegetables, which is also hurt. In the past, they have alternated, but this year they are both at the same time. Personally, I think the reason is inflation, which has caused the increase in the cost of various crops for farmers, but the income of ordinary urban residents has not kept up with the increase in inflation.

Vegetables are expensive and hurt the lives of the masses, vegetables are cheap, and the cost of buying is low, and the enthusiasm of vegetable farmers is lost

1.That is, the price of vegetables is only a little higher than the actual ** or lower than the actual **, and the farmers have no benefit, discouraged their enthusiasm. or a backlog of agricultural products.

2.Due to the fact that the price of vegetables has changed hands several times through the middleman, the price of vegetables has increased several times, resulting in a decrease in consumer demand and a decrease in market demand, and the vegetables of vegetable farmers have caused a backlog. Heavy losses hit its enthusiasm.

The interests of those who buy groceries are lost. It hurts the people.

If it is too cheap, the farmer's income will be reduced. It will suffer a loss of interests.

If it is expensive, it will harm the interests of the people, and if it is cheap, it will harm the interests of vegetable farmers.

Economic reform means that the emergence of rich people and peaceful peasants will hurt the people, and the peasants will be hurt by cheap vegetables, and social corruption will hurt the primary productive forces.

Vegetable prices plummeted, and vegetable farmers lost money. The common people did not feel that the price of vegetables was large**. - The vegetable farmer said that he didn't make any money, and he was a seller.

The seller said that he didn't make any money, and it was a logistics company. The logistics company said that it was not making money, and it was Sinopec and highway tolls. Sinopec and Highway also said they were losing money.

Who makes the money?

The high cost of vegetables does not necessarily benefit farmers, but the majority of people have never eaten cheap vegetables!

There must be a problem, the Chinese are not dumber than foreigners, but there are more problems than foreigners. There are management problems, the front is expensive oil, expensive road fees, expensive traffic police fees, expensive parking fees, in short, ten fees and eight fees. There's more on the back, it's hard.

The dish is too cheap....Vegetable farmers didn't make any money, and some of them lost money.

Charging three or five buckets more is not necessarily a good thing. It is difficult to be a farmer, and it is even more difficult to be a cheap farmer. The wages of the public have been raised, and the expensive vegetables can also be afforded. Can you average it out?

The middle traffickers are black, there are many upside-down links, people, vehicles, road cards, oil, and various expenses to buy vegetables and pay out of their pockets, and farmers and people are all victims.

The most desirable is an equivalent exchange.

Equivalent"valence", the value of which depends on the average productivity of society.

Imitation farmers and imitation people are both injured people, and those whose personal productivity is much higher than the average level of society are still profiting.

The money of the vast number of consumers is money, and the money of the vast number of farmers is even more difficult to earn. This dish is not expensive, nor is it cheap, a topic of contradictions.

I hope that the price of vegetables will be low, and I will give some subsidies, so that farmers will not be harmed, and the poor can eat vegetables, and doing a good job in transportation is the key.