Let me ask you a question, what is the difference between the struggle of contradiction and the nega

The struggle of contradictions: the two sides of the contradiction are opposed to each other, the attributes and tendencies of separation from each other, the difference between each other and the exclusion of each other, the "struggle" in philosophy and the "struggle" in life are the relationship between commonality and individuality, and the struggle of contradictions is absolute and unconditional.

The negative aspect of a thing is the aspect of a thing that causes it to perish. Once the negation aspect gains a dominant position, things are transformed into their opposites, reaching self-denial, achieving a qualitative leap, and the transformation and resolution of contradictions.

No. The identity of the contradiction: the attributes and tendencies of the two sides of the contradiction that attract each other and connect with each other; interdependence under certain conditions; interpenetrate each other and transform each other under certain mediation; The identity of the contradiction is relative and conditional.

Identity is premised on struggle, which resides in identity and is constrained by identity; The two sides of the contradiction are the same, driving the movement, change and development of things.

Unity of contradictions: The nature and tendency of the two sides of the contradiction to be interrelated and attracted to each other. It has two implications:

First, the two sides of the contradiction are interdependent. The two sides of the contradiction are in a unity, they depend on each other and are the prerequisites for each other's existence. Second, the two sides of the contradiction are interconnected.

This refers to the mutual influence, interaction, interweaving and interpenetration of the two sides of the contradiction, and transforming each other under certain conditions.

Different, of course. The combative nature of contradiction is the content of the contradictory view in the contradictory view of materialist dialectics, while the negative aspect of things is the negative view. It's different in nature.

The antagonistic attribute of contradiction is the nature of struggle, which is the attribute of mutual exclusion and opposition between the two sides of the contradiction, reflecting the tendency and tendency of the opposing sides to separate each other; The negation of things is the negation of the self-generation of things, that is, they deny themselves, develop themselves, and have a certain sense of innovation.

The identity of contradiction is not unity, these are two different concepts, although contradiction is the unity of opposites, but it is not opposition and unity.

Struggle also includes the positive and negative aspects of things, and things advance and develop in the struggle of contradictions.

The unity of contradiction includes opposites and identity.

Very simple! One is interest! One could be face!

The struggle of things is for the sake of profit.

Contradictory struggles may be for the sake of face! Maybe it's some misunderstanding or something, give it to me

1。I don't know.

2.Contradiction is the unity of opposites. The opposing attribute of contradiction is struggle, and the unifying attribute of contradiction is unity.

Summary. 1.The development of things is the result of the joint action of the identity of contradictions and the nature of struggle.

2.The role of contradictory identity in the development of things is mainly manifested in the following aspects: the two sides of the contradiction are developed in interdependence; The two sides of the contradiction can learn from each other's favorable factors and develop; It stipulates the basic direction and trend of the development of things.

3.The role of contradiction struggle on the development of things is mainly manifested in: promoting changes in the balance of forces between the two sides of the contradiction, resulting in quantitative changes in things; Promote the transformation of the status or nature of both sides of the contradiction, and realize the qualitative change of things.

How to understand the relationship between the identity and struggle of contradictions and their role in the development of things? How to distinguish the dialectical relationship between identity and struggle when answering the question?

1.The development of things is the result of the joint action of the identity of contradictions and the nature of struggle. 2.

The role of contradictory identity in the development of things is mainly manifested in the following aspects: the two sides of the contradiction are developed in interdependence; The two sides of the contradiction can learn from each other's favorable factors and develop; It stipulates the basic direction and trend of the development of things. 3.

The role of contradiction struggle on the development of things is mainly manifested in: promoting changes in the balance of forces between the two sides of the contradiction, resulting in quantitative changes in things; Promote the transformation of the status or nature of both sides of the contradiction, and realize the qualitative change of things.

How do we understand that things complement each other in opposite ways? Can you give an example?

Hold on. The opposite complements each other.

For example: the police and the gangsters, the police catch the gangsters, the police and the gangsters are incompatible, this is the opposite. But without gangsters and the like, the police will have nothing to do, or even disappear, which is mutually reinforcing, so the relationship between the police and the gangsters is the opposite.

I'm sorry I didn't see it yesterday, but I'll think about it again, thank you.

The identity of contradictions: refers to the nature and tendency of the interconnection between the opposites of contradictions, including three levels: interdependence, mutual penetration, and mutual transformation.

The fighting nature of contradictions: refers to the nature and tendency of the separation between the opposites of contradictions, including three levels: mutual differences, mutual exclusion, and mutual negation.

Relationship: Identity and struggle are interconnected and inseparable.

There is also both identity and struggle between identity and struggle.

Identity is inseparable from struggle, and struggle is the premise;

Struggle is also inseparable from identity, and identity is an abode.

Fighting is absolute and unconditional; Identity is relative, conditional identity and struggle jointly promote the development of things, and conditional relative identity and unconditional absolute struggle combine to constitute the contradictory movement of all things.

Contradiction is a relationship between the elements of things or between things that are both opposing (mutually exclusive) and unified (interrelated).

Opposition and unity are two aspects or two attributes of contradictory relations, the opposing attribute of contradiction is called struggle, and the unified attribute of contradiction is called identity.

1. Definition of scope.

The identity of a contradiction refers to the interdependence and interpenetration nature and tendency of the two sides of the contradiction.

First, the two sides of the contradiction are interdependent.

In the thirties and forties of the 20th century, a life-and-death war was waged on the land of China.

Second, the two sides of the contradiction are interconnected. There are two aspects to interpenetration:

First, the two sides of the contradiction penetrate each other.

The Japanese side is cultivating traitors in China, and the Chinese side is looking for friends in Japan.

The second is the tendency of the two sides of the contradiction to transform into each other.

At the beginning, the Japanese attack and defense; Later, the victory was defeated.

The fighting nature of a contradiction refers to the nature and tendency of the two sides of a contradiction to exclude and separate each other.

Contradiction is a universal philosophical category. Includes:

Adversarial struggle: You live and die on both sides.

Non-confrontational struggle: various divisions among the people.

2. Dialectical relationship.

The identity of contradictions and the nature of struggle are unified (interdependent).

On the one hand, the nature of struggle restricts identity.

In September 1937, the anti-Japanese national united front was formed. Adhere to the principle of independence and self-determination. Wang Ming's viewpoints of "unification," "unification of the army," and "unification of mass organizations" are completely wrong. "If we seek unity through struggle, we will survive in unity, and if we seek unity through concession, we will die in unity." ”

On the other hand, identity restricts struggle.

The CPC led the military and the people to uphold the principles of reasonableness, advantage, and moderation, safeguarded the existence of the united front, and created conditions for victory in the War of Resistance Against Japan.

The identity of the contradiction and the fighting nature are opposites (distinct from each other).

Identity is relative (conditional); Fighting is absolute (unconditional).

In war, a life-and-death struggle inevitably leads to a war ending somehow.

The role of the identity of contradiction in the development of things:

1) The two sides of the contradiction are the conditions for the existence of each other, and the two sides of the contradiction can use the development of the other party to achieve their own development;

2) The two sides of the contradiction contain each other, and can absorb each other's favorable factors and develop;

3) The two sides of the contradiction are interconnected with each other and can be transformed into their own opposites and develop.

the main aspects of the contradiction and the secondary aspects of the contradiction; Major contradictions and minor contradictions. The former refers to a contradiction, and the latter refers to all the contradictions that prescribe a thing. One of the three principles of dialectics:

The law of the unity of opposites stipulates the motive force and source of the development of things. The main contradictions of things and the main aspects of the contradictions dominate the basic trend of the development of the Tenth Five-Year Plan.

Contradictory Identity Description:

1. Stipulate that one party absorbs from the other elements that are beneficial to its own development.

2. Stipulate the transformation of oneself into one's opposite.

3. The existence of one party presupposes the existence of the other.

The so-called struggle of contradictions and the identity of contradictions, that is, opposition and unity, are the two opposite and complementary basic attributes inherent in the contradictions of things. All contradictions have these two attributes, otherwise they would not be contradictions.

The identity of a contradiction is the nature, tendency, and tendency of the two sides of a contradiction to be interrelated and attracted to each other. Things are universally connected, and the specific forms of universal connections are diverse. The identity of contradictionsThis connection is one of the essential connections of things, which refers to the connection between contradictory opposites.

Only the connection between contradictory opposites constitutes the identity of the contradiction. The connection between contradictory opposites is the same because they have a common ground in their existence and contain certain things in common with each other.

The identity of contradiction has two basic meanings: first, the contradictory opposites are interdependent and mutually conditional. Second, the opposing sides of the contradiction are interconnected and accessible to each other, and the coherence and accessibility of the two sides of the contradiction have a variety of situations, and their manifestations are multifaceted.

The contradictory opposites are not only interpenetrating and containing each other, but they are also interconnected, and there is a bridge between them and a tendency to transform each other. This is a concentrated expression of the coherence between the two sides of the contradiction. It is precisely because of this that the contradictory identity is a vivid and dynamic identity, and the opposites can transform and transition to each other under certain conditions.

Another basic attribute of contradiction is the fighting nature of contradiction. The so-called fighting nature of contradictions refers to the nature, tendency, and tendency of the two sides of a contradiction to alienate and exclude each other. The combative nature of contradiction is a broad philosophical category that has many different manifestations and can be expressed in many different terms (e.g

negating each other, opposing each other, limiting each other, dividing each other, criticizing each other, etc.).

As a universal philosophical concept, the contradictory struggle nature has the greatest generalization, rich content, and a variety of vivid forms, which are mainly manifested in two aspects: first, the contradictions of different things are different in their exclusive nature and forms of struggle; Second, in the development and process of the same contradiction, the specific conditions of the contradictory struggle are also distinguished from each other.

The nature of contradiction struggle runs through the whole process of contradiction development, but there are differences in the specific situation of contradiction struggle at different stages. In other words, we should not obliterate the existence of contradictions and the universality of contradictions and struggles because of the differences in the forms of contradictions and struggles in the process of development.

To sum up, the identity and struggle of contradictions are opposite, and these two attributes of contradictions are interconnected and inseparable. On the one hand, the existence of identity is premised on the nature of struggle, and there is no identity without the nature of struggle. On the other hand, the existence of struggle is also premised on identity, and struggle is always linked to identity.

The two are the unity of dialectic, grasping the same in the opposition and the opposition in the same.